Quantcast
Channel: Solicitors – Legal Cheek
Viewing all 4559 articles
Browse latest View live

Ex-Eastenders and Strictly Star Chris Parker On His Frustration With Law Firms’ A-Level Obsession

$
0
0

After spending his 20s as an actor, rising to fame in Eastenders and Strictly Come Dancing (see below), Chris Parker decided he wanted to get serious and become a lawyer....

So he enrolled in a law degree at Birkbeck College, University of London, continued working doing TV presenting and voice-over work, and is set to graduate next year. But Parker has a problem. Because he got into acting young, he doesn’t have any A-levels. And we all know how beloved A-Levels are to law firms as a way of sifting TC applications.

Having scored high grades in his degree modules so far, Parker shares his frustration on the A-Level issue with solicitor Kevin Poulter and Legal Cheek editor Alex Aldridge (the trio are pictured below), before helping them understand the current trend for celebs to become lawyers...

This podcast is also available on iTunes.


‘Can You Be A Lawyer With Tattoos?’ Asks Wannabe Barrister Professor Green

$
0
0

And the answer to rapper Professor Green’s question, which he asked the other day on Twitter, is...

...Yes! Just ask Mexican lawyer Maria José "Vampire Woman" Cristerna...

Or indeed Isle of Man-based solicitor Paul Beckett.

Green's tattoo query, which he followed up with the tweet below, suggests he's still flirting with his previously-documented dream of becoming a lawyer, a path increasingly trodden by celebs – with Blur's Dave Rowntree and Ex-Eastenders star Chris Parker among those who've recently made the switch.

‘I Fear That I Was Too Ready To Treat The View Of The Experienced As Gospel’

$
0
0

Ed note: This is the latest post in the 'If I knew then what I know now' series, where leading members of the legal profession share their wisdom with the next generation of wannabes.

I have spent thirty years as an 'academic' – whatever that means – as a teacher of law and as part of a team founding a number of legal projects, including what is now a major law school.  Some of these ventures were successful, others not, as is often the way in life, writes godfather of legal blogging Charon QC...

It was made very clear to me by a rather abrupt chambers clerk many years ago that it would not be possible to combine a career in academe with the rigours of being available for work in chambers. I had to make a choice.

I chose to teach law, inspired by the knowledge of how not to teach law acquired by recent experience on the Bar Final course – which was, in the late 1970s, right at the very pinnacle of astonishingly bad teaching. Thankfully, things have since changed for the better.

If I knew then what I know now, I am fairly sure I would have been less persuaded by that clerk’s view, and have made a stab at both teaching and practising law. I regret not having had experience of legal practice, and suspect that I would have enjoyed a career at the Bar. On the other hand, the choice I made has led to many years of pleasure, and some of worry, so I do not complain. Still, looking back, I fear that I was too ready to treat the view of the experienced as gospel. I have since learned to be more sceptical of those who claim experience and knowledge.

I relay this simply to encourage those at the start of their careers to be robust in their thinking and not to fear error. "I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only make them think," said Socrates. He was right. Instead, we can reveal knowledge; we can explain our own interpretation of that knowledge; we can encourage our students to look deeply into the subject; and above all, we can encourage them to think and engage in discussion. That dialogue, between student and teacher, between lawyer and judge, accounts for a lot, including the development of the law.

My last ten years of law blogging and podcasting – my writing at times sensible, and on occasions verging on the insane – has taught me to be more eclectic in my reading and thinking; to embrace art, history, science, philosophy and sociology as I observe the legal condition. If I knew then what I know now, I would have made better use of my time to explore these areas at university. Certainly, I thoroughly approve of those students who do a non-law degree first and then do the Graduate Diploma in Law (GDL) as a foundation for practice. All law and no play does, I think, make Jack/Jill a rather dull lawyer.

I end with an anecdote. Fifteen years ago I was giving a seminar on the law of contract and drafting to a group of trainees from a magic circle firm. A very wise and experienced partner started proceedings by saying that a good foundation in contract law was essential for all members of the firm, because 90% of their work was based on contracts and drafting.

But that was just the starting point, he added. The firm did not need 'legal technicians’, the partner explained, rather lawyers who could advise clients not what the law prohibited – that was easy – but what it could permit, or be persuaded to permit. If I knew that way back then, I am sure I would have been better served.

Good luck and, as I rarely give advice (not being of a Moses disposition), I end by quoting Douglas Adams: "So long, and thanks for all the fish."

Charon QC is currently touring Britain as part of his Vin Rouge Law Tour, compiling a digital legal doomsday book as he travels. Look out for his vintage red Jag in a town near you in 2013.

2012: ‘The Year Social Media Made It Onto The Legal Map’

$
0
0

Over a bottle or two of the finest Tesco Value red wine, the Legal Cheek team deliver their reflections on 2012 – and predictions for 2013...

For editorial assistant Lucy Pether, a final year law student at the London School of Economics, 2012 has been the year of the vocational degree, where students ditch their English Literature dreams in favour of a good old fashioned LLB.

Special correspondent Kevin Poulter, meanwhile, is delighted to see other lawyers following him onto Twitter and other social networks that he has been stalking since 2007 – and expects law to get even more social next year.

Putting a downer on things is Legal Cheek editor Alex Aldridge, who reckons 2013 will be a tough year for law students and rookie lawyers unless they become more open-minded about embracing emerging new career paths.

This podcast is also available on iTunes.

Just When You Thought Personal Injury Law Couldn’t Get Any Classier…‘Pimp My Claim’ Arrives

A Year In Stories: The Best Legal Cheek Posts Of 2012

$
0
0

Isn’t It Great To Be Back At Work!

$
0
0

Photobucket

Meanwhile on Twitter lawyers share their 2013 pain...


Has ‘Spit Roast Email’ Trainee Daniel England Been ‘Offered A Job’ As A Newly Qualified Solicitor By Shearman & Sterling?

$
0
0

In February, Shearman & Sterling trainee Daniel England (pictured left) found himself at the centre of a media storm when his email detailing lurid plans for a lads rugby holiday was leaked to various national newspapers – and quickly became a viral sensation.

The email contained a list of weird tour rules for England and his pals to abide by, which encouraged, amongst other things, the group to publicly boast about their parents' wealth. It also mentioned plans to photograph group sex acts (hence the 'spit roast email' tag).

At the time, Shearman & Sterling expressed itself "very disappointed" with England's behaviour, which it described as "totally at odds with [its] values." The firm added: "We are taking this matter very seriously and are investigating it in accordance with our established procedures."

Happily for rugger bugger legal hopefuls everywhere, England seems to have survived said investigation – appearing to suggest on LinkedIn that he has been offered a job as a newly qualified solicitor in Shearman & Sterling's Singapore project development and finance team.


Shearman & Sterling: ‘We Never Offered Email Scandal Trainee An NQ Solicitor Job; He Resigned Over The Summer’

$
0
0

Yesterday we brought you news of the updated LinkedIn profile of Shearman & Sterling 'spit roast email' trainee Daniel England. As you can see below, it suggested that England had been offered a job by the firm as a newly qualified (NQ) solicitor.

But yesterday evening Shearman & Sterling responded to our original pre-publication inquiry to deny ever offering England an NQ position.

A Shearman & Sterling spokesperson told Legal Cheek: "Daniel England resigned over the summer. He never went through the qualification job offer process and we never offered him a newly qualified solicitor job."

England has since removed the claim that he was 'offered a job' from his LinkedIn profile.

Further inquiries have indicated that England left Shearman & Sterling with the intention of working as a ski instructor, although this remains unconfirmed.

England didn't respond to Legal Cheek's request for comment.

Leaked Email: Hogan Lovells Partner Orders Associates To Be At Their Desks By 9am – Even If They’ve Been Working Late

$
0
0

Corporate lawyers pride themselves on being able to swan into work late. The trade off, of course, is that they tend to leave late. Unfortunately for Hogan Lovells' Shanghai-based lawyers, this is an attitude that enrages the punctual Brit at the office's helm...

In an email leaked to US blog Above the Law yesterday – reproduced below in full – Hogan Lovells' Shanghai office chief Andrew McGinty writes that fee-earners' "remuneration takes account of the fact that there will be times when they need to work long hours to meet client deadlines or expectations. Therefore there will be no automatic right for fee earners to arrive late the day after late working..."

McGinty, a steely expat who dragged himself to the pinnacle of corporate law from a lowly start at Leeds Met, adds: "I am usually in by 9 am every day and will be doing my own visual checks...yesterday morning the office looked almost deserted at that time (with apologies to those who were here) which is simply not acceptable."

HOGAN LOVELLS — ANDREW MCGINTY — EMAIL RE: PUNCTUALITY

Dear all,

We are still experiencing major issues with staff punctuality. The Shanghai partners have decided that we will continue to operate the daily report system as before but will not circulate the report to all members of the Shanghai Office but will circulate the record to all the partners and XXXX. [She] will note all those arriving after the required time, and will notify the responsible partners whenever anyone arrives late a certain number of times within a month (regardless of the reasons). If these absences are found to be excessive and not justifiable on reasonable grounds, those people will be spoken to and warned. If there is insufficient improvement after the warning, an internal review will be conducted and disciplinary measures may be imposed. Persistent non-justifiable lateness will henceforth be included as a factor that will be considered in relation to internal promotions, appraisals, pay reviews and renewal of contract decisions.

XXXX will still complete the report by 9:15am each work day morning. Please let her know before 9am if you will not be in the office by 9am and, if so where you are and when/what you expect to return to the office. If the reason for your absence is “running errands”, please specify whether it is for personal or for business purposes. In all case, an expected return time is required, otherwise it will be recorded as “no explanation”.

The Shanghai partners take the view that fee-earning staff are expected to manage their own time in a professional manner and that their remuneration takes account of the fact that there will be times when they need to work long hours to meet client deadlines or expectations. Therefore there will be no automatic right for fee earners to arrive late the day after late working and any late arrival due to late working or non-business-related reasons will be with the agreement of a supervising partner (not necessarily myself). Where a late arrival has been approved, you should report to XXXX “coming in at xxhrs with agreement of [Name of Partner]“. For those fee earners who intend to arrive at 9am on any given day but find that they will arrive shortly after 9am due to transportation issues or otherwise, they should still report the reason to XXXX, but this will be recorded as a late arrival and you should adjust your transportation arrangements accordingly to prevent a reoccurrence. Where you have a business-related reason this should be reported as before e.g. “Attending BritCham seminar” and will not be recorded as a late arrival.

For support staff, they are expected to be in at 9 am every workday morning, but they are also entitled to claim overtime payment where they are required to work late.

The following policy will apply to support staff unless otherwise agreed by a partner:

(a) where the overtime ends after 11 pm but before midnight, you are allowed to come to the office by 10 am the next morning;

(b) where the overtime ends after midnight but before 2 am, you are allowed to come to the office by 11 am the same day;

(c) where the overtime ends after 2 am, you are allowed to come to the office by 12 pm midday the same day

These times and requirements are firm and are meant to be strictly adhered to. XXXX will be checking to ensure that support staff and fee earners comply with the above requirements. Where a partner agrees to any late arrival arrangement with a fee earner or with any member of the support staff outside the scope of (a) (b) or (c) above, it should be copied to XXXX. If you have a pre-scheduled appointment with a doctor or hospital or an annual health check-up, then you do not need to seek approval from a partner, but should let your supervising partner or Jennifer know in advance as well as reporting to XXXX. In return for everyone making a real effort to improve their punctuality, the partners will strive to show flexibility and understanding in one-off exceptional cases or genuine unpredictable emergencies, which would generally not count as a late arrival. What is not acceptable is a pattern of lateness without reasonable justification.

Please make travel and other arrangements that allow you to meet these requirements. If you need to put in place on-going (i.e. not one off) special working arrangements due to the need for child care or otherwise, please discuss with a partner. The new policy does not impact on the legal rights of those who are entitled by law to special working hours arrangements or your statutory entitlement to sick leave.

I am usually in by 9 am every day and will be doing my own visual checks (as will other partners and XXXX) – yesterday morning the office looked almost deserted at that time (with apologies to those who were here) which is simply not acceptable.

If you have any questions above the new policy, please speak to myself, XXXX or your main supervising partner.

Andrew

REVEALED: The Original South Korean ‘Lawyers Gangnam Style’ Video

$
0
0

When Southampton University law student Tommy Chuang posted his brilliant 'Lawyer Style' video on YouTube last month, we billed it as the first legal Gangnam Style parody. But it turns out that the Korean Bar Association narrowly beat Chuang to this honour with its surreal 'Lawyers Gangnam Style' video, released three days earlier on 7 December.

'Lawyers Gangnam Style', including these bizarre toilet and horse head scenes, is below...

Thanks to Ladidah for the tip.

Solicitors Regulation Authority Fuses Judaism And Islam To Create New Religion

$
0
0

The Solicitors Regulation Authority's (SRA) latest diversity survey has an eye-catching new 'Jewish Muslim' option in its religion section. According to journalist Joshua Rozenberg, who spotted it, the category is "apparently a 'misprint'".

Bad Legal Aid Omen Of The Week

$
0
0

Go to the Ministry of Justice website, scroll to the bottom – and in the 'Topics' section, click on 'Legal Aid'...

UPDATE: The MoJ have updated their site (see below for how it looked)

Thanks to barrister-to-be Probably Penman for the tip.

‘I Look Forward To Meeting You On 31 Sept As Well’: Cambridge Law Student Taunts ‘Sloppy’ Law Firm Grad Recruiters

$
0
0

As a strategy to land a job, Sebastian Salek's decision to pen an article for The Independent published yesterday lampooning "sloppy" graduate recruiters seems rather risky. But there's no denying that the Cambridge law student makes some good points. Such as...

1. The tendency to make silly mistakes not being limited to applicants – as illustrated by the time Salek got invited to an interview on 31 September. "Yes, 'sir/madam', I look forward to meeting you on 31 September as well," he recalls drily of the error.

2. Incomplete application forms. Salek (pictured left) explains: "Often, when I’m asked to select my subject (law, hardly unheard of) from a drop down list, it’s not there and I’m forced to choose something else entirely. I could probably just about have forgiven this sort of irritating blunder if one of the guilty parties hadn't been a City law firm." Ouch.

3. Crashing application form websites – about which Salek is a bit more coy, refraining from mentioning, for example, the recently-retired Pupillage Portal.

4. Firms' failure to live up to their diversity boasts. Why, continues Salek, publicly claim to "value diversity highly" when at interview you say stuff like: "To get a job here, you have to pass what we call the 'good bloke test'. Or the 'good blokette test'."

5. Not being bothered to provide applicants notice when they're unsuccessful. According to Salek, "many [recruiters] will unashamedly tell you that they’re not even willing to send out a mail merged email."

Law firm graduate recruitment departments keen to chew over in more detail the above criticisms can contact Salek via Twitter.

How Bad Does Your Wide-Ranging Crime Spree Have To Be To Prevent You From Becoming A Solicitor?

$
0
0

Last week a Bradford solicitor was jailed for five years for paying off witnesses in a Crown Court trial to help his client evade fraud charges. But most eye-catching about the case – which involved a fake energy drink called, unappetisingly, 'Duracell' – was the rap sheet of the solicitor in question, Majed Iqbal, BEFORE he became a solicitor...

Over to the Bradford Telegraph & Argus:


Solicitors Are Like GPs And Barristers Like Consultants, Says Eddie Stobart Lorries

$
0
0

Eddie Stobart Lorries' move into offering legal services – via its newly-formed Stobart Barristers arm – has prompted it to issue a controversial definition of the distinction between solicitors and barristers...

"So what's the difference," begins Stobart Barristers on its website...

But not everyone is impressed by this pitch. An experienced criminal barrister told Legal Cheek: "On the money some firms will be paying to advocates under the new 'One Case One Fee' regime, it will be difficult to attract the best barristers, many if not most of whom will have left the Bar."

In other Stobart Barristers news, the fledgling legal organisation has confused a London postcode (EC1) with a tribunal claim form (ET1).

‘Cocky’ Warwick Uni Law Student Fails In Bid To Become Countdown Supreme Champion – Then Jousts With Host

$
0
0

Yesterday Warwick Uni LLM student Mark Deeks narrowly lost his battle with a Cambridge maths student on daytime TV show Countdown. After the final question, a disappointed Deeks (pictured) found himself engaged in some on-camera job interview practice by the show's host, Nick Hewer...

"What are you going to do when you finish your masters there at Warwick?" prodded Hewer, who famously starred as Alan Sugar's right hand man on The Apprentice alongside ex-Herbert Smith solicitor Margaret Mountford.

"That is a valid question, Nick. Next question," scowled Deeks, 28, who was famously labelled "cocky" by Countdown numbers expert Rachel Riley during his march to the show's semi-finals in 2011.

Encouraged by the audience's nervous laughter, Deeks then quipped:  "I just chose the degree that makes me sound most like a super hero: INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE!"

To which Hewer, who's clearly not a member of the 'Mark Deeks Appreciation Society' (pictured below), retorted: "There'll be a slot for you somewhere – possibly quite far away..."

Boyfriend Of Solicitor ‘Told Not To Have A Relationship Or Babies’ By Her Boss Goes On The Social Media Offensive

$
0
0

The boyfriend of solicitor Kate Baker has weighed into the row surrounding her sexual harassment, sexual discrimination and unfair dismissal claims against Devon law firm Follett Stock.

Social media manager Tristan Rothwell (pictured left) began by identifying himself on LinkedIn as "the person she was having the relationship with!"...

He then turned to Twitter to label Baker's former boss, Follett Stock managing partner Chris Lingard, as a "vile creature and thats doing him a favour".

Elsewhere there has been support for Lingard, with a solicitor who used to work for him writing on Facebook that he was a "hilarious" boss and that Follett Stock was "a generally fun and relaxed placed to work".

Follett Stock denies the claims. The hearing will take place at a yet-to-be-scheduled later date.

The Definitive Way To Decide Whether You Should Become A Barrister Or A Solicitor

$
0
0

Last week Eddie Stobart Lorries' newly-formed legal arm caused controversy by claiming that solicitors are like GPs and barristers like consultants. While there's some truth in this medical analogy, it can also be misleading – with misguided notions of status often leading wannabe lawyers to do the Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) when they should do the Legal Practice Course (LPC). So how do you decide?

First, understand that legal aid-funded areas will lend themselves better to practising in a law firm than as a self-employed individual over the next few years – for junior lawyers, anyway. So if you want to do criminal law, where funding cuts are seeing law firms do lower and mid-end advocacy in-house, right now it's best to start out as a solicitor. Down the line as you build a reputation, you can always change.

The exception to this rule is if you land a large Inns of Court scholarship that will pay your way through law school – an expense law firms specialising in publicly-funded work don't cover. In that case, do the BPTC. If you then find yourself struggling at the Bar, you can always go and work for a law firm as an in-house advocate.

For those interested in working in practice areas that are largely privately-funded, there are two important questions to consider. 'Am I very clever?' and 'Am I very good at advocacy?'

If the answer to both of those is yes, become a barrister.

If the answer to either (or both) is no, become a solicitor.

If you're not sure, apply for scholarships, pupillages and training contracts – and go with the best deal you get offered. Again, you can always switch at a later stage, with both branches of the profession welcoming converts from the other side, whose experience they value – no matter what Stobart Barristers may suggest.

Vac Scheme Application Forms: It’s All About The ‘Challenging Situation’ Question

$
0
0

Barrister-to-be OccupyTheInns shares his pupillage hunt wisdom with wannabe solicitors as they prepare to submit their vac scheme application forms before the 31 January deadline.

As I come to the end of an enormously fulfilling period assisting on an international human rights and sustainability project, and find myself looking forward excitedly to taking up pupillage in September, I think often of law students at home struggling to make their way in the world. This is the time, of course, that they must apply for those godforsaken vacation schemes.

I know the challenges facing them all too well having applied for numerous vacation schemes myself – and undertaken one at a very prestigious City law firm – before deciding to follow the path of the barrister. Therefore, I believe that I may be of some assistance...

Before I proceed, let me make clear that my advice assumes the necessary level of academic attainment from the right institutions for candidates to be seriously considered by law firms. I also assume readers will have a robust CV containing many extra-curricular activities and work experience – something else which has long been de rigueur at the Bar, but now is also required at the best law firms, if to a slightly lesser degree.

At the Bar, the key differentiating factor on application forms is the "Why do you want to become a barrister?" question. It penetrates the heart of the issue: are you one of us or are you not?

For the pragmatic solicitors' profession, priorities are different. Nevertheless, a single question on the vacation scheme or training contract application form stands out from amongst the crowd. It is the "challenging situation" question, which states: "Provide an example a challenging situation you faced. What key obstacles were you presented with and how did you overcome them?"

If I were of the solicitor persuasion, I believe my recent experience in international development would equip me perfectly to deal with this question. I have encountered more challenging situations than you could throw a stick at, with an encounter with a pack of wild dogs and the unwelcome attentions of a lady of the night not even the greatest ones!

But those stories are for another day. In any case, my greatest challenge – and the one that comes to mind if I were completing a vacation scheme application form today – has been being charged with helping a charming (but disorganised) band of locals change the lives of their own community for the better. As my first substantial experience of "management", it has been both interesting and rewarding.

Although my calling has never been to work in an office environment, this experience has taught me that I possess the ability to organise teams – an absolutely essential attribute for a solicitor at a large law firm. So what key obstacles was I presented with and how did I overcome them?

Principally, they were twofold: achieving successful outcomes despite language difficulties and cultural differences, and confronting a resistance to established scientific views on sustainability. I overcame them through, firstly, education – of myself in the culture of a foreign land, and of its people in my knowledge of sustainability – and leading by example. This saw me gradually win the respect of the team and press forward to complete the project.

One example of how I did this was during the building of an irrigation canal. Despite having very little experience in this area, I was able to overcome the resistance I initially met from the local village people to the planned course of the new canal. Through a series of spontaneous in-the-field demonstrations, where I explained the basic science behind the chosen route of the canal, I won their understanding, respect and loyalty. As I prepare for a well-earned break at a nearby resort, I believe that these factors will ensure the legacy of the project going forward.

Good luck with your applications – and remember that an example of overcoming key obstacles closer to home can also make a powerful impact on application forms.

OccupyTheInns was called to the Bar in July 2011. He will commence pupillage in autumn. There's more from OccupyTheInns here.

Viewing all 4559 articles
Browse latest View live