Quantcast
Channel: Solicitors – Legal Cheek
Viewing all 4559 articles
Browse latest View live

‘I’m a future trainee who is Asian and working class: This is what diversity means to me’

$
0
0

Shez Anjum reveals how he overcame prejudices to win ‘Trainee of the Year’

Diversity is a broad concept, with many facets to it and different forms. It means a lot to me: being from a working class and a black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) background, I have experienced the challenges and prejudices that come when trying to ‘make it in law’. Yet these difficulties have also acted as a motivation for myself. Firstly to try and prove that despite the obstacles, you can be successful and, secondly, to be part of the drive for change and equality.

I am only at the beginning of my career but in the space of a few years, I have gone from having zero legal experience and starting off as a paralegal, to securing a training contract and winning Trainee/Paralegal of The Year at the 2018 Manchester Legal Awards. The road I travelled has not been smooth, and I have experienced how archaic the legal industry can still be.

Progression is a key issue. Despite there being a large number of talented law students and paralegals from working class or BAME backgrounds, this does not follow through in the vast majority of trainee intakes. This problem becomes more compounded further up the career ladder as those that do qualify often drop out of the profession. Why does this happen? I’m not entirely sure, but I do know of two things that contribute to the problem.

One is lazy recruitment. The tick box exercise of ruling out anyone who did not get straight As and did not attend a Russell Group university has led to some law firms having trainee intakes with the same amount of diversity as an episode of Midsomer Murders.

To address the issue of social mobility, consideration has to be given to the fact that people from a disadvantaged background experience their biggest difficulties at the beginning of their lives and this usually impacts on their ability to fulfil their potential while undertaking their GCSEs and A-Levels. This results in people already way behind the start line falling even further behind, all before their career has even started.

Graduate recruiters and HR departments of law firms need to make a positive effort to address this issue and look at alternative methods of recruitment. It is all well and good sticking one of the few BAME candidates that have been recruited on the front cover of brochures, to showcase the firm’s ‘commitment to diversity’, but until recruitment methods are changed, the vast majority of talented individuals from diverse backgrounds will continue to be overlooked.

The latest comments from across Legal Cheek

The other issue is the attitude of some members of the industry. I have been lucky to come across many inspirational and positive role models throughout my career so far. I work for a firm with a wonderful inclusive environment that has been cultivated by its people and has recognised what I have to offer. However, I have also experienced the prejudices and difficulties of this industry.

Being from a BAME or a working class background, you are constantly having to fight against preconceived conceptions, with the focus being on trying to survive in this industry. Opportunities are harder to come by and until you have proven yourself, you definitely have to do more than colleagues from advantageous backgrounds to earn the same chance, even if you are more deserving or better suited to the opportunity.

Then there is the elephant in the room, a topic not many people are willing to discuss: discrimination.

Thankfully, this is far from widespread and attitudes are changing. However, it is still a major reason why people from BAME backgrounds drop out from the profession. You only have to read the comments in a Legal Cheek article on diversity in law, or the vile comments in the group chat of law students from the University of Exeter which has recently come to light, to see archaic views are still in existence. Personally, early on in my career, I have experienced situations that range on the spectrum. From the mild, of having a colleague say ‘You’re Asian, the women in your family will know good places to get eyebrows done!’, to the more severe.

As a profession we need to accept that there is still an attitude issue, which must be addressed. By addressing, I don’t mean having the HR and marketing departments come up with a catchy slogan on diversity to tweet, but by driving real change and setting up diverse (in all senses of the word) teams, that can grow and learn together, while nurturing an inclusive environment. The cities that we work in are diverse and vibrant, yet not all the offices of law firms in these cities reflect that.

Coming from a diverse background does not mean you are the best person for the job and you should be given the opportunity, but it does certainly mean that you are more likely to be overlooked and will have more challenges and difficulties to prove that you should be given an opportunity. Is it too much to ask for a level playing field? To be judged on talent and work ethic and not the circumstances that we were born into.

I have, like many others from a similar background, had to work harder and overcome many obstacles. You have to be resilient, motivated, determined but most importantly you have to believe because hard work always shines through. Despite the difficulties, if you are talented (although it may take you longer) you will create an opportunity to prove yourself and you shall have success in this industry. Take it from someone who was written off, who went from starting his legal career way behind the rest of the pack, to winning Trainee/Paralegal of The Year at the 2018 Manchester Legal Awards. If I can do it then you can too. However, this should not be the norm!

My journey in law has only just started, but along with the many other people from a similar background doing the same, we will strive for progress and change every step of the way, while looking to inspire the boys and girls who we once used to be. All I ask the next generation to do is dream big, because a path of change is being paved and they can aspire to be brilliant, aim higher and not give in to the same doubts that previous generations did.

We are seeing in other industries how game changers from diverse backgrounds are redefining their sector and the same is starting to happen in law. They are looking to disturb the status quo and not only open the door into the industry but knock it flat down and create a level playing field, where the first thought will no longer be about surviving but rather thriving.

Shez Anjum is a future trainee at a medium sized law firm based in the North West. He has a particular interest in increasing diversity and breaking down barriers to entry in the legal industry.

The post ‘I’m a future trainee who is Asian and working class: This is what diversity means to me’ appeared first on Legal Cheek.


‘Ministry of Injustice’: Lawyers hold candlelight vigil over legal aid cuts

$
0
0

Barristers have been refusing to take new publicly-funded cases since 1 April

Image credit: Twitter @thebarcouncil

Hundreds of campaigners stood shoulder-to-shoulder yesterday evening outside the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) as part of a protest over the government’s ravaging cuts to legal aid. The ‘Vigil for Justice’, organised by campaign group the Justice Alliance, comes just days after the number of chambers refusing to accept publicly-funded defence work hit 91.

Twitter was awash last night with eye-catching images of solicitors, barristers and more mourning the metaphorical death of the UK justice system. Those gathered heard impassioned speeches from the likes of Garden Court Chambers’ Mark George QC, Shadow Justice Secretary Richard Burgon MP and Young Legal Aid Lawyers’ co-chair Katherine Barnes.

Placards were aplenty: Legal Cheek particularly liking this Pusheen the cat-inspired effort.

As day turned to night, many protestors started lighting candles.

At one point, ‘Ministry of Injustice’ was projected onto the side of the MoJ’s office.

The protests suggest many lawyers agree with the Criminal Bar Association’s (CBA) position that ‘enough is enough’.

In March, CBA members voted overwhelming in favour of direct action from 1 April. This was in response to changes to the Advocates’ Graduated Fee Scheme (AGFS), which barristers say will result in further cuts to their income. Nearly three weeks on, and it is now understood that over 90 chambers are declining legal aid-funded defence work.

And things don’t look much brighter for their solicitor counterparts.

New research published by the Law Society this week suggests criminal defence solicitors may become extinct in parts of England and Wales within five years. Citing “drastic cuts” and an increasingly ageing profession, Law Society president Joe Egan warned that the justice system was facing a “cliff edge scenario”.

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Newsletter

The post ‘Ministry of Injustice’: Lawyers hold candlelight vigil over legal aid cuts appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Online scammers impersonate City solicitor as part of ‘air crash’ payout scam

$
0
0

Norton Rose Fulbright stresses the emails are bogus

Internet wrongens have pinched the name of a top Norton Rose Fulbright (NRF) lawyer in what appears to be a crude attempt to add legitimacy to an email scam. The firm has issued a statement stressing it is in no way connected to the bogus emails.

According to a warning on the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA) website, unsuspecting members of the public have received emails claiming to be from “Barrister Tim Ingham” at “Norton Rose Fulbright Law Firm”. The emails, sent from “tim.ingham@timoffice.co.uk”, concern “an inheritance or other payment following a supposed air crash involving a family member”.

The real Tim Ingham is a litigation and dispute resolution consultant solicitor (so not a barrister as the scammers suggest). He is based in the London office of NRF and specialises in aviation insurance claims, according to his firm profile.

The 2018 Firms Most List

A spokesperson for NRF said:

“We are aware that emails are in circulation purporting to come from an individual who works at Norton Rose Fulbright. These emails are bogus and have no connection with us. We have notified the SRA accordingly. We of course regret that our name is being used in an attempt to defraud members of the public.”

This isn’t the first time lawyers have been targeted in this manner.

In 2016 we reported that scammers had pretended to be City solicitor Matthew Woods in order to dupe unsuspecting members of the public. The emails claimed Woods, who is a partner at the London office of international outfit Withers, needed help tracking down the relative of a deceased client, but neither Woods nor Withers had anything to do with the messages.

Several months later and it was the UK Supreme Court’s turn. Taking to Twitter, the highest court in the land issued a warning that tricksters were firing off sham subpoena emails using their details.

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Newsletter

The post Online scammers impersonate City solicitor as part of ‘air crash’ payout scam appeared first on Legal Cheek.

‘I returned to my desk and broke down in tears’: Magic circle junior lawyer opens up about battle with depression and anxiety

$
0
0

Three-part blog is frank account of City solicitor’s journey

A magic circle solicitor has written a brutally honest and illuminating blog charting a “terrifying” year in his life when he reached his lowest point and contemplated suicide, and his slow but inspiring road to recovery.

Lloyd Rees, a knowledge lawyer at Freshfields in London, posted the first of his three-part blog series, called ‘What Have You Got To Be Miserable About?’, on Mental Awareness Day in March. It starts with Rees’ attempt, in early 2017, to come off medication that he had been on for a number of years. But withdrawal resulted in an “extremely bad reaction” including “heart racing”, a “zapping sensation in my head” and even “vomiting in the morning”.

Finding his old depressions resurfacing, he explains his utter despair at the time:

“I remember thinking: what on earth do we do now? A failure. Can’t function. Can’t enjoy anything. What is the point?”

After a meeting at his firm which in other circumstances he would have attended without incident, he writes: “I returned to my desk and broke down in tears.”

Rees eventually saw a private GP who advised him to go back on medication, but this in itself made him feel “like a failure”. Returning to his home in the Merthyr Tydfil area of Wales, he describes the sheer debilitation that having a mental health illness causes: “My concentration had evaporated. I couldn’t read anything let alone work out what it was about. Terrifying. I normally read a couple of books a month.”

By January of this year, Rees had plunged further into his depression which he describes in his blog with both power and, amazingly, humour.

“The depression was raw. Heavy. Dark.” He continues: “This was the next level. To use a phrase from George W. Bush… this ‘was some seriously weird shit’.” The blog continues:

“On that Sunday morning, I realised that I had ticked over into a more severe and dangerous phase of depression. (I paused for nearly 10 minutes before I wrote this next sentence) I didn’t want to be alive anymore.”

From this point, however, Rees story turns to recovery. He checked himself into the Nightingale Hospital in Marylebone and began a new treatment programme including different drugs and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT).

As he eventually begins a phased return to work, Rees concludes his blog by saying:

“I still had months and months of recovery and work to do to get back to where I was. I’d escaped the very worst part but this was really only the beginning. I needed to learn to live properly with this condition. It wasn’t going to defeat me. Not for a second.”

Glimpses of Rees’ legal self pop up in the blog in quite a positive way. Here’s a snippet on how his lawyer-brain helped him during the consultation at the Nightingale at a time when Rees describes himself as otherwise a “blubbering wreck”:

“Luckily, somewhere deep inside my seemingly non-functioning brain my lawyer’s training had helped. I’d noted down a few things in my trusty notepad during the consultation.”

Rees, who got a first in law from Cardiff University before going on to study the LPC at BPP Law School in Holborn, joined Freshfields in February 2013 as a trainee, qualifying into the corporate team.

The 27-year-old, who is active on Twitter with almost 4,000 followers, tells Legal Cheek:

“Mental health conditions are indiscriminate and affect people from all walks of life and at different stages of their lives. I battled with this condition from my late teens and I wish I’d had the confidence to speak more openly about it then. I hope by writing these blog posts I’ve helped continue to raise awareness of mental health conditions.”

Of the positive reaction to the blog, Rees says he has been “overwhelmed”, and has indicated that he will be publishing more posts on his blog in the future.

Elizabeth Rimmer, CEO of LawCare, a mental health charity that runs a helpline for lawyers, said: “People like Lloyd opening up about their experiences is absolutely vital in tackling the stigma surrounding mental illness. Mental health affects all of us and Lloyd’s blog is frank, eloquent and brave.” She continued:

“We hope his story will help others recognise the signs of anxiety and depression and give them the confidence to seek help.”

You can contact LawCare by calling 0800 279 6888.

Comments on this article are now closed.

The post ‘I returned to my desk and broke down in tears’: Magic circle junior lawyer opens up about battle with depression and anxiety appeared first on Legal Cheek.

New drama set in London divorce firm hits TV screens tomorrow

$
0
0

Could The Split be the new Silk?

A new series portraying life in the fast-paced world of London’s divorce law scene hits television screens tomorrow.

The BBC’s latest legal offering, The Split, tells the story of the Defoe family — a ménage of some of the country’s leading divorce lawyers. However, loyalties are put to the test when Hannah Stern, a senior partner, joins a rival law firm, Noble & Hale, and faces her mother and sister on the opposing side of a high-profile divorce case.

The six-part series, which starts tomorrow (24 April) at 9pm on BBC1, also contains a few additional sub-plots, including the return of Oscar, the Defoe sisters’ long-lost father.

The Split features some familiar acting faces. The role of Hannah is played by Nicola Walker (Spooks and Four Weddings and a Funeral), while her sister Nina and mother Ruth are played by Annabel Scholey (Eastenders and Britannia) and Deborah Findlay (Collateral and Torchwood) respectively. Other TV stars include Stephen Mangan (Green Wing and Billy Elliott), who plays Hannah’s lawyer husband, Nathan.

The 2018 Firms Most List

The Split’s creator, Abi Morgan, spoke to a number of family lawyers as part of her research. On this she said: “I was surprised at how complex and varied family law is — it’s not just divorces.” Morgan, who wrote scripts for the 2015 hit Suffragette, continued:

“There’s the complex world of pre-nups, which raises questions that make for an incredible story — legislating for an end when you’re at the beginning and in that bubble of love. Then there’s child arrangements and the rights of parents, surrogacy, issues around fertility. It suddenly felt like a very rich and complex world to interrogate.”

The Split’s inaugural episode comes four years (yes, we can’t believe it either) after fellow London-based legal drama Silk aired its final episode. The series, which proved popular among law students and lawyers alike, focused on the daily goings-on of fictional criminal set Shoe Lane Chambers.

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Newsletter

The post New drama set in London divorce firm hits TV screens tomorrow appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Barclays and Law Society launch new lawtech hub — with support from top firms and unis

$
0
0

Set to open in Notting Hill soon

Top law firms and Russell Group universities have thrown support behind a brand new lawtech incubator, which has been launched by Barclays and the Law Society.

Backing the new ‘Eagle Lab’ incubator are magic circle titans Allen & Overy and Clifford Chance, as well as: Baker McKenzie, Brethertons, Capital Law, Clyde & Co, DWF, Gowling WLG, Latham & Watkins, Norton Rose Fulbright, PWC, Simmons & Simmons, SO Legal and TLT.

Eagle Lab is set to open in Notting Hill, London, and will provide working space for up to 100 people.

Find out more about STEM Future Lawyers

But what’s it all for? Christina Blacklaws, the vice president of the Law Society, says the new Eagle Lab will create a space for solicitors to learn and innovate alongside entrepreneurs and developers, who will have access to mentoring and workshops. The partnering law firms will give entrepreneurs feedback and guidance, while the universities involved, UCL and the University of Liverpool, will provide academic input. Ashok Vaswani, the chief executive of Barclays, said:

“Lawtech is an area where the UK has every reason to be a world leader. It is home to some of the greatest law firms in the world and we want to help build on the success of its legal sector, and play a leading role in transforming law-tech in the future.”

This launch of this latest hub, also supported by lawtech community Legal Geek, comes just weeks after one of the firms supporting the venture announced a lawtech graduate scheme.

Allen & Overy is “ideally” looking for STEM graduates for its new two-year training contract-style programme, which will see trainees work in areas including artificial intelligence and data extraction. Though some believe the importance of tech in legal practice has been overstated, this move signals how much Allen & Overy values techy-minded trainees.

Purchase tickets for Legal Cheek’s Future of Legal Education and Training Conference on May 23.

The post Barclays and Law Society launch new lawtech hub — with support from top firms and unis appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Criminal defence solicitor thrust into tabloid spotlight over claims she’s living with her Celebrity Big Brother reality star client

$
0
0

She represented Jeremy McConnell after he was arrested for assaulting ex-Hollyoaks actress Stephanie Davis

Image credit: Facebook (Katie McCreath)

A criminal solicitor has hit the headlines this weekend — for reportedly living together with an ex-client of hers. Katie McCreath, a lawyer at Crown Defence Solicitors, acted for model and reality TV personality Jeremy McConnell after he was arrested for assaulting his on-off girlfriend Stephanie Davis, who he met while the pair were on Celebrity Big Brother (CBB).

McCreath studied law at BPP Law School before being admitted to the roll in 2010. Her firm profile states she’s a specialist in serious and high-profile criminal defence, and that she competes in equestrian sports at a national level.

According to the Mail Online — one of many tabloid news sites to report on McCreath and McConnell’s apparent move-in — the pair have been living together since he left prison in December. He ended up behind bars after breaching a suspended sentence imposed on him for assaulting his ex-girlfriend and the mother of his son, ex-Hollyoaks actress Davis.

Davis and McConnell’s turbulent relationship has been a reality TV car-crash: they first hooked up on CBB, while Davis was in a relationship with model Sam Reece. Reports of cheating, addiction and drug use blighted the romance, and both were at some point in the relationship arrested for domestic abuse.

Things came to a head in August last year after McConnell pleaded guilty to assaulting Davis (the judge said Davis “had a number of injuries… including a large bite mark to her arm”). McConnell was handed a 20-week sentence, suspended for a year. That day, McConnell was pictured leaving court alongside McCreath (thought it was actually her colleague, James Morris, who acted for McConnell in court).

The 2018 Firms Most List

Though he escaped an immediate custodial sentence, McConnell later spent 34 days behind bars after he missed court-ordered community service to get a hair transplant in Turkey. He was released just before the New Year.

An article in The Mirror from January claims the twosome went on a “rowdy” night out with friends in celebration of McConnell having his electronic tag removed, during which he was reportedly filmed pulling his trousers down “to reveal a gleaming pair of white boxers”.

Reports also say McCreath has become McConnell’s manager, and that she has been advising him on his TV comeback. McConnell has previously appeared on This Morning, Beauty School Cop Outs and The Jeremy Kyle Show. A source is quoted in The Sun as saying:

“Jeremy is getting ready to make his big comeback and has been lying low… He is really close to her and she’s been helping him work out how to build up his public personality again. He thinks of Katie as the person that rescued him and will help make him famous again.”

McCreath declined to issue a comment to Legal Cheek about her newly-found tabloid fame. The criminal defence solicitor’s LinkedIn page says she was a sales representative at Ann Summers before she went on to study law from 2006 to 2009. Her training contract was serious and business crime-focused, and in 2010 she qualified as a higher courts advocate.

The post Criminal defence solicitor thrust into tabloid spotlight over claims she’s living with her Celebrity Big Brother reality star client appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Disability policies are the legal profession’s disconnect

$
0
0

GDL student David Mant explores what firms can do to combat substantial underrepresentation of disabled lawyers

A layperson could be forgiven for holding that law firms’ diversity policies represent substantive progressivism. Representation from marginalised groups has, fortunately, increased: the number of female partners rising from 25% in 2014 to 29% in 2017, while law firms have seen a seven percentage point increase in black, Asian and minority ethnic lawyers working in firms.

The figures, from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), do not indicate a paradigm shift (fundamentally, underrepresentation still endures). But they do, inter alia, provide reassurance of change and tempered optimism. This is fractured only when the elephant in the room, disability, is factored in.

The statistics here are stark. Since 2014 there has been a net increase of one percentage point of disabled lawyers, with only 3% of lawyers self-identifying as having a disability (10% of the UK workforce has a disability).

Are these statistics the product of how law firms and chambers treat their disabled lawyers? Robert Hunter, a former City partner, notes he was “struck by the disconnect between the appearance some law firms were presenting regarding their disability-friendliness and the reality on the office floor”. Commercial barrister Diego Soto-Miranda, a wheelchair user, reveals he was carried up the stairs of his chambers for his first year of practice because the building was not wheelchair accessible.

The 2018 Firms Most List

If we grant that the profession is committed to increasing diversity, including disability, then what can be done to address the deficit?

Let’s recourse to the Equality Act. The act creates a provisional duty for employers to make reasonable adjustments to facilitate greater access to jobs. The point of contention concerns what constitutes ‘reasonable’. Apologists may note it’s sine qua non that surgeons have a steady hand; while it may be possible to employ a person with a hand tremor, it isn’t cost effective by any means. But, what of less integral adjustments: flexibility, reduction in hours worked and remote working?

This potential flexibility is caveated by the reality that in some areas of law, flexibility is not always possible. In commercial law, there may be a genuine need for bodies in chairs till the contract is completed in the early hours. However, corporate lawyer Arunima Misra, who has a disability called paraparesis, notes that in other areas such as corporate trusts, regular hours may entertain greater flexibility.

Even so, lawyers, notoriously, are gluttons for work and the jobs market is constructed around this ethos. Very few part-time roles exist and those that do mandate experience.

David Merkel, a member at the Law Society’s Lawyers with Disabilities Committee and himself visually impaired, highlights another concern: lawyers with disabilities have to demonstrate a “particularly strong commitment to the job”. Merkel mentions he would personally work an extra hour than his colleagues — this perhaps informed by an attitude that disabled lawyers must do more to justify their employment, as employers are taking a risk on them. Without conjecturing on the pervasiveness of this complaint, it seems prima facie that if the attitude was to change then to some level employment will increase.

Law firms also need to recognise that disability is not synonymous with inability. Solicitor Jocelyn Cockburn, speaking at a recent event, adds that “adversity forces us, as disabled lawyers, to be creative and resilient in a way able-bodied lawyers are not”.

Another positive manifestation of this adversity can be found in the huge amounts of compassion and empathy disabled lawyers have for others who are experiencing hardship. This compassion could be hugely beneficial in the likes of family law and human rights practice. This tough mind-set combined with strong empathetic qualities could be advantageous to employers. But, if firms and chambers don’t realise this, they’ll continue siphoning those with disabilities into other areas of employment.

David Mant is a University of Nottingham law graduate who is currently studying the GDL. He is an aspiring family lawyer.

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Newsletter

The post Disability policies are the legal profession’s disconnect appeared first on Legal Cheek.


SRA appeals tribunal’s ‘unduly lenient’ sanction against City solicitor convicted of sexual assault

$
0
0

He was suspended but not struck off after Christmas party attack

London Rowing Club

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is to appeal to the High Court over what it describes as an “unduly lenient” sanction imposed on a former in-house lawyer. Alastair Main, who was convicted of sexual assault and racially-aggravated assault, was suspended from practice but not struck off the roll.

Main, a former lawyer at global asset management firm Schroders, was handed a 12-month community order after attacking a woman at the London Rowing Club’s 2015 Christmas party in Putney. The married father-of-one was also placed on the sex offenders register for five years.

At trial, Wimbledon Magistrates’ Court heard how University of Nottingham grad Main had poured beer over a 27-year-old woman and called her an “Australian slut”. Main — who trained at international outfit Ashurst — was also said to have followed the unnamed woman into the ladies’ toilets, lifted up her skirt and slapped her bottom.

Earlier this year, Main was handed a lifeline by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) after it decided against striking him off. Instead, Main was suspended from practising for two years and ordered to pay approximately £2,000 in costs.

Interestingly, the suspension was backdated to begin when Main lost his job following his conviction in January 2017. Therefore, he has been suspended until January 2019.

The 2018 Firms Most List

The SRA has now confirmed it’s appealing the SDT sanction. A spokesperson said:

“While it is not for us to say what sanction the SDT should have applied, we feel that the suspension of less than a year was unduly lenient and have appealed to the High Court.”

In reaching its decision, the tribunal noted that Main “had already been punished by the criminal courts and that its role in this matter was to consider the protection of the public and the maintenance of the reputation of the profession”. It continued:

“Public confidence in the legal profession demanded no lesser sanction than suspension but the tribunal did not consider that the protection of the reputation of the legal profession justified striking off the roll.”

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Newsletter

The post SRA appeals tribunal’s ‘unduly lenient’ sanction against City solicitor convicted of sexual assault appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Allen & Overy reveals latest tech start-ups to join its ‘Fuse’ innovation hub

$
0
0

AI-powered app and virtual assistants that can read among this year’s successful applicants

Fuse Innovation Hub

Allen & Overy (A&O) has announced the second batch of tech start-ups joining its hipster-esque innovation hub.

The five new companies which, in May, will take up residence at the magic circle player’s ‘Fuse’ space are: Bloomsbury AI, Kira Systems, Neota Logic, Regnosys and Signal Media. They will join three start-ups from A&O’s first Fuse cohort — Avvoka, Legatics and Nivaura — who are staying on.

Last year, we reported that A&O was offering free space within its “specially-designed” hub to both “early-stage” and “mature” tech companies. As well as a roof over their heads, entrepreneurs benefit from being able to tap into some of the firm’s top legal and business minds. Last August, A&O welcomed eight businesses through its doors.

Almost a year on and over 80 applications later, A&O has named the second bunch of start-ups to join Fuse. But what do we know about the outfit’s newest residents?

First up, Bloomsbury AI. This early-stage business is in the process of developing “virtual assistants” which can be taught to read, reason and communicate.

Another soon-to-be Fuse resident, Kira Systems, has embraced the weird and wonderful world of artificial intelligence (AI) to create a document review and analysis system. A host of top outfits have already embraced Kira’s tech offerings including Freshfields, Clifford Chance, DLA Piper — and A&O.

Next up, Neota Logic. This New York-founded tech outfit has created an AI-powered app development platform, which helps automate legal expertise, processes and documents. Meanwhile, fintech company Regnosys, also taking up residence in Fuse, delivers “machine executable regulation” specifically for the financial industry.

Last but not least, there’s AI-powered intelligence firm Signal Media. This company turns information from the likes of the news and global regulatory updates into more accessible business knowledge.

Shruti Ajitsaria, head of Fuse, said: “Opening for the second cohort has enabled us to keep abreast of the constantly changing legaltech ecosystem and we’re really pleased with the standard of the companies joining us next month.” Ajitsaria — who will be speaking at Legal Cheek‘s The Future of Legal Education and Training Conference alongside other top speakers on 23 May in London — added:

“We look forward to building on the learnings that we gained from the first cohort to ensure that this programme is just as successful.”

This latest Fuse announcements comes just weeks after A&O launched a legaltech graduate recruitment scheme. The programme — which mimics the two-year, four-seat structure of a training contract — will see successful participants obtain a recognised qualification in project or process management. The firm is seeking candidates who “ideally” have science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) degrees or economics degrees, however law graduates can still apply.

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Newsletter

The post Allen & Overy reveals latest tech start-ups to join its ‘Fuse’ innovation hub appeared first on Legal Cheek.

‘A cosy old boys’ network’: MP grills SRA over its handling of Weinstein NDA scandal

$
0
0

Regulator says there is an investigation under way into Allen & Overy, the firm that drafted the document

Philip Davies MP submitted the chief executive of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to intense questioning this morning, about what Davies saw as the lack of action taken by the regulator against magic circle law firm Allen & Overy (A&O).

The firm and its employment partner, Mark Mansell, were advisers to Miramax at the time that the company, founded by Harvey Weinstein, entered into a highly-criticised non-disclosure agreement (NDA) with Zelda Perkins, Weinstein’s former assistant in London.

Davies grilled the SRA’s Paul Philip about the fact that the SRA had on the one hand issued a warning notice to the profession about NDAs — which it had in March 2018 — and yet at the same time appeared not to have taken action against the firm for drafting Perkins’ NDA that included provisions which, so drafted, “could amount to professional misconduct,” Davies said.

Philip confirmed that the regulator does have “an open investigation” into the matter.

SRA chief executive, Paul Philip

The committee also criticised the SRA for not obtaining a copy of the NDA itself when the matter was first reported to it in November 2017. The committee heard that the SRA had met with A&O on 28 November 2017 but had not at that point in time taken any further action pending “further information coming to light”. But nor had the SRA seen a copy of the NDA itself, the committee heard.

The 2018 Firms Most List

Philip conceded that the SRA “should have asked for it [the NDA]” at the time.

Davies concluded that the whole episode “leaves a taste in the mouth that the SRA and its relationship with solicitors is like that of a cosy, old boys’ network, scratching each other’s backs and not taking anything seriously”. He asked Philip: “Are you not embarrassed about this?”

Philip denied this and defended the SRA’s record in investigating and pursuing solicitors who cross the line:

“The fact is that we receive about 12,000 complaints each year, we have taken action in relation to about 1,000 of these, and about 200-300 of those are prosecuted before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal.”

Davies pressed him further: “Maybe it is a cosy organisation for big solicitor firms?”

Philip, again, defended the SRA’s record in relation to the larger firms, arguing that the regulator has taken “a number of significant pieces of action against big solicitor firms in the past three years”.

The NDA, signed by Perkins in 1998 following an allegation of sexual harassment against Weinstein, has been heavily criticised for its heavy-handedness and, potentially, “perverting the course of justice” as it attempted to bar Perkins from reporting her allegations to the police and even putting restrictions on her ability to discuss her situation with a medical practitioner.

The Women and Equalities Committee set up an inquiry into sexual harassment in the workplace in light of the Weinstein scandal, looking into how widespread sexual harassment is, and what the government and employers should be doing to improve the situation.

During the inquiry, the committee has focused particular attention on the use of NDAs by employers in relation to ex-employees, and the role of lawyers in drafting them.

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Newsletter

The post ‘A cosy old boys’ network’: MP grills SRA over its handling of Weinstein NDA scandal appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Brexit shmexit? Most City firms think EU departure won’t affect lawyer numbers

$
0
0

Music to training contract seekers’ ears?

The vast majority of London law firms don’t expect Brexit to have an important impact on their employment levels, new research shows. Only 2% of the 100 firms surveyed forecast the referendum result having a “significant impact”, while the majority, 72%, don’t anticipate any impact at all.

The reason behind this positive forecast may be at least partly down to expected Brexit-related litigation, suggests EU professor Steve Peers. Speaking to Legal Cheek, the University of Essex academic says this potential litigation may “concern the details of leaving the EU and the future relationship between the UK and the EU”, which will keep lawyers busy.

Indeed David Allen Green, legal commentator and City lawyer, echoes this when he tells us:

“Few commercial lawyers campaigned for Brexit, and Brexit is contrary to the interests of many commercial clients. Yet Brexit will mean, at least in the short to medium term, that there will be more need for legal expertise. Lawyers generally did not support Brexit, but Brexit will do quite a lot to support lawyers.”

This new report, which you need to register to access, may go some way to quelling law student fears about training contract numbers. A Legal Cheek article written by a law student just a week after the referendum vote namechecked decreasing training contract numbers as a law student Brexit fear. “Law firms could cut down on their trainee intakes or even enter a dreaded recruitment freeze,” she speculated.

The 2018 Firms Most List

Legal Cheek revealed last year that training contract places among the leading corporate law firms had fallen by 5%. Whether this is Brexit-related or not can only be speculated. On the other hand, training contract numbers across the board, not just in the City, are actually up. Law Society stats show there are 5,728 trainee places now, up by 1,000 since the 2008 financial crash.

Elsewhere the new report — which is by research blog CBRE and includes data from the 100 biggest law firms in London by floorspace — reveals most law firms don’t expect Brexit to affect their profitability. There may be a minor impact, 36% of firms think, but most (59%) expect “no impact”. Dominic Raab, the former City lawyer turned MP for Esher and Walton said this research is a “good illustration of UK ability to adapt” on his Twitter account.

The post Brexit shmexit? Most City firms think EU departure won’t affect lawyer numbers appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Ince & Co trainee sacked over ‘professional standards’

$
0
0

First-year rookie’s dismissal expedited after partner let slip over firm drinks

A trainee solicitor at Ince & Co has been given his marching orders after failing to meet the firm’s “professional standards”. Ince & Co stressed the decision “followed careful consideration”.

An Ince & Co insider has told Legal Cheek that a partner was overheard discussing the first-year trainee’s impending exit during the firm’s monthly drinks. This, according to our source, sent HR into “overdrive” and the underperforming newbie was promptly dismissed the following day. On this, a spokesperson for Ince & Co — which takes on around ten trainees annually on a starting salary of £37,750 — said:

“It is highly regrettable that a partner was overheard discussing the matter, and that partner now accepts that it was inappropriate to have done so.”

The remaining rookies were officially told the news of one of their counterpart’s firing after being summoned into a meeting room later on in the day.

The 2018 Firms Most List

A spokesperson for Ince & Co said:

“We have always taken great care in the career development of our trainees at Ince & Co and believe we offer an outstanding training programme. Nevertheless, and despite being placed on a performance improvement programme, we took the decision to bring to an end a training contract of one of our first-year trainees purely for reasons of professional standards. This decision was not taken lightly and followed careful consideration within the firm.”

In our Trainee and Junior Lawyer Survey, shipping law specialist Ince & Co scored As for tech, office and canteen, as well as Bs for quality of work, peer support, partner approachability, work/life balance and perks.

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Newsletter

The post Ince & Co trainee sacked over ‘professional standards’ appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Percentage of trainees experiencing mental health problems DOUBLES

$
0
0

High workload and client demands cited as top causes of stress

The percentage of trainee solicitors experiencing mental health problems has more than doubled, according to new research from the Junior Lawyers Division (JLD).

Of the 332 trainees who responded to this year’s JLD survey, 39% reported experiencing a mental health problem, up from 19% last year. Overall, 39% of the 959 junior solicitors, trainees, paralegals and Legal Practice Course (LPC) students questioned said they had suffered a mental health issue (whether formally diagnosed or not) within the past year. This marks a rise of 13 percentage points when compared to the 2017 result (26%).

Elsewhere in the report, one fifth of respondents (20%) reported “regularly feeling unable to cope as a result of stress”, up from 16% last year. Over one quarter of LPC students (27%) surveyed said they had suffered “severe” or “extreme” levels of stress.

The 2018 Firms Most List

The sources of stress cited in the report include “high workload” (67%), “client demands/expectations” (58%), “lack of support” (45%), “ineffective management” (43%) and “lack of control” (36%). Other contributors referenced by respondents included “billable hours targets” (27%) and “lack of resources” (26%).

With the majority of those questioned stating their firm could do more to support their mental health at work (80%), the report showed junior lawyers were embracing everything from exercise to alcohol to alleviate the pressures of work.

Law Society council member Kayleigh Leonie said:

“There is real value in investing time and resource to improve employees’ mental wellbeing and mental health. The legal profession is at risk of losing some of its best talent if employers do not begin to embrace their employees’ wellbeing as a key asset for their business.”

The findings follow a swathe of cases to appear before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) with mental health and stress at their heart.

Peter Naylor, a corporate associate who sent several misleading emails to a client to “buy [himself] some time”, claimed he had been left “physically and emotionally drained” by his heavy workload. Naylor avoided a strike off after the tribunal noted he “had suffered from mental health issues”.

Meanwhile, junior solicitor Sovani James found herself in hot water after she forged documents in a clinical negligence case. The SDT chose not to strike James off the roll after it heard that the “toxic” firm she had been working for had adopted a “sudden focus on financial return on employees” and an “aggressive implementation” of billing targets.

You can contact LawCare by calling 0800 279 6888.

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Newsletter

The post Percentage of trainees experiencing mental health problems DOUBLES appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Solicitor who specialises in the rights of the elderly jailed for ‘sickening’ neglect that led to 79-year-old mother’s death

$
0
0

Emma-Jane Kurtz sentenced to two-and-a-half years

Oxford Crown Court

A solicitor who specialises in looking after elderly clients has been jailed for two-and-a-half years for wilful neglect after her 79-year-old mother was found dead at their Oxfordshire home.

Police officers attended the family home of solicitor Emma-Jane Kurtz in July 2014, where the body of her elderly mother, Cecily Kurtz, was found slumped on a soiled sofa. She was covered in faeces and urine burns, and weighed just over six stones.

Emma-Jane, a former associate at regional law firm Boyes Turner, was charged in April 2017 with wilful neglect. She was a member of the Court of Protection team and had been a member of Solicitors for the Elderly since 2011, according to her LinkedIn profile. She is listed on the Solicitors for the Elderly website, which mentions “paying for care” and “elder abuse” as her “areas of specialism”.

The 2018 Firms Most List

Sentencing, Judge Peter Ross said Cecily had been “left to rot” and that images of her post-mortem examination “looked like a photo from a concentration camp”. Jailing Emma-Jane for two-and-half years, he said of her conduct: “There was a closing of the door both metaphorically and literally.” The judge also noted Emma-Jane had mild autism and was undergoing therapy.

Following sentencing at Oxford Crown Court, Detective Constable Francesca Griffin reportedly said Cecily’s body “was found on a sofa and she had been slumped over with her chin on her knees for five days”. Griffin continued:

“[Cecily] had become incontinent and was covered from head to toe in faeces, had not changed her clothing for a decade and had urine burns. Emma-Jane Kurtz said she had gone into the room with her mother three or four times a day. There had been many opportunities over months and years to help her and remove her from that situation.”

Kirsty Allman, prosecuting, explained Emma-Jane’s elderly mother had “suffered unimaginably” in “horrifically squalid conditions”. She continued:

“It is rare to come across a case that involves such sheer and blatant neglect against a vulnerable, elderly woman, by someone who was supposed to love and care for her. This has been one of the most shocking and sickening cases of neglect I have come across.”

A spokesperson for the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) said: “We are aware of this and have been awaiting conclusion of the criminal case. We will now obtain all relevant information before deciding on any appropriate next steps.”

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Newsletter

The post Solicitor who specialises in the rights of the elderly jailed for ‘sickening’ neglect that led to 79-year-old mother’s death appeared first on Legal Cheek.


Slaughter and May sacks two future trainees for failing LPC modules

$
0
0

Cut-throat world of corporate law laid bare

Slaughter and May has terminated the training contracts of two trainees for failing modules on the Legal Practice Course (LPC).

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the elite magic circle player takes a tough stance on the academics of its 80 or so annual rookies, who study an accelerated version of the LPC at BPP Law School. “Our trainees are required to pass all the modules of the LPC at the first attempt,” a spokesperson for Slaughter and May tells us.

Legal blog RollOnFriday has now reported that two future trainees at Slaughter and May have had their training contract offers metaphorically torn up after failing to complete the course at the first time of asking.

The 2018 Firms Most List

A spokesperson for Slaughter and May — which pays its first-year trainees £44,000 a year — told Legal Cheek:

“Unfortunately, these two students did not pass. If they are able to resit their papers and have that classed as a first attempt, we would of course accept them back.”

As things stand, Slaughter and May currently covers LPC fees and gives future trainees a further £10,000 in living support. The firm declined to comment on whether the duo would now have to pay this back.

The accelerated LPC is favoured by a number of top City outfits including Freshfields, Herbert Smith Freehills and Hogan Lovells. It takes aspiring solicitors just six-and-half-months to complete, versus the traditional ten months, and due to its accelerated nature is considered the tougher option.

The double-training contract termination comes just days after it emerged that a trainee solicitor at Ince & Co had been given his marching orders for failing to meet the firm’s “professional standards”. A firm spokesperson stressed the decision “followed careful consideration”.

The post Slaughter and May sacks two future trainees for failing LPC modules appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Law firm partner struck off after headbutting EastEnders star’s father in the High Court

$
0
0

Philip Saunders handed 18-month suspended sentence for ABH last year

CCTV footage captures the moment Philip Saunders headbutted Mohammad Reza Ghadami

A law firm partner who headbutted a litigant-in-person at the High Court’s Rolls Building has been removed from the profession.

Last year, property law specialist Philip Saunders was handed an 18-month custodial sentence, suspended for two years, after attacking property developer Mohammad Reza Ghadami. The fracas left Ghadami — whose son Davood plays Kush in the BBC soap EastEnders — with a broken nose and requiring treatment under general anaesthetic.

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) has now confirmed that Saunders, formerly of London-based law firm Bearman Saunders, has been struck off the roll and ordered to pay costs of £4,611. Finding that Saunders had failed to act with integrity, the SDT said:

“We have considered carefully what the behaviour of Mr Saunders demonstrates, on that unhappy day, and we accept the submissions of both persons that a single act may constitute a lack of integrity.”

During the three-hour SDT hearing, Saunders claimed he had lost his temper after Ghadami made a “vile anti-Semitic comment”, but did not provide further details of the exact words allegedly used. He added: “I am an observant religious Jew. I have a high moral standard.”

The 2018 Firms Most List

At the time of the incident, incredible CCTV footage (embedded below) from inside London’s Commercial Court surfaced on YouTube appearing to show Ghadami swing his briefcase between Saunders’ legs. The experienced solicitor can be seen adjusting his feet before appearing to headbutt Ghadami in the face.

Saunders was not acting in his capacity as a solicitor at the time but was embroiled in a £100 million legal dispute with litigant-in-person Ghadami. The 69-year-old was eventually found guilty of assault occasioning actual bodily harm. Sentencing Saunders at Inner London Crown Court, recorder Steven Gasztowicz QC said:

“The offence was committed in a High Court building, where any litigant is entitled to feel safe, however annoying he may be and whatever is going on between you. It was committed by someone who was a solicitor, who is trusted to act properly in such buildings”

Saunders — who had been practising as a solicitor for more than 40 years — was also handed a five-year restraining order, a four-month curfew, ordered to complete 200 hours of unpaid work, and pay £5,000 prosecution costs.

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Newsletter

The post Law firm partner struck off after headbutting EastEnders star’s father in the High Court appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Student and junior lawyer two-minute survey: The future of legal education and training

$
0
0

Have your say

Amid all the opining and pontificating by lawyers and academics about the future of legal education and training, one notable group often goes unheard: the students.

Yes, ironically it’s the people who have to actually do — and pay for — the Legal Practice Course (LPC), which will soon be replaced by the Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE), who tend to have least input into what form changes to it should take.

So, ahead of this month’s Future of Legal Education and Training Conference, Legal Cheek is asking students and junior lawyers for their view. The results will be presented to the learning & developments professionals and academics at the conference.

The survey below takes two minutes to complete and is totally anonymous.

Create your own user feedback survey

You can also complete the survey here.

The post Student and junior lawyer two-minute survey: The future of legal education and training appeared first on Legal Cheek.

A magic circle firm or a top US firm? I have a training contract offer from both and don’t know which to pick

$
0
0

Aspiring lawyer would appreciate readers’ advice

In the latest instalment in our Career Conundrums series, one wannabe solicitor can’t decide which training contract offer to accept.

“I have been offered a training contract from a magic circle firm and a leading MoneyLaw firm which has its headquarters in the United States. I can’t decide which one to pick and I’d appreciate readers’ advice on which they’d go for.”

If you have a career conundrum, email us with it to careers@legalcheek.com.

The post A magic circle firm or a top US firm? I have a training contract offer from both and don’t know which to pick appeared first on Legal Cheek.

10 times RPC’s trainees improved your commercial awareness

$
0
0

From cryptocurrencies to big data, politics and beyond

Commercial awareness is the buzz phrase on training contract applications — but what does it actually mean, and how can you demonstrate it? RPC’s Trainees take on business blog shows that commercial awareness doesn’t just mean reading about share prices.

1. When we discussed the impact of a sugar tax in the UK (both on the economy and our waistlines!)

Sugar tax: a sweet deal? [Trainees take on business]

2. When the trainees used current commercial trends to predict the future — from politics and business, to entertainment and food… and succeeded (mostly)

Another year of surprises [Trainees take on business]

Were the predictions right? [Trainees take on business]

3. When we demystified insurtech jargon just in case blockchain and machine learning still don’t mean that much to you…

Insurtech Jargon 101: What does it all mean? [Trainees take on business]

4. …and took on cryptocurrencies…

ICOs in Hong Kong [Trainees take on business]

5. …and then Big Data and its Big Problems

Big Data, big problems? [Trainees take on business]

6. When our Hong Kong trainees walked us down the 21st Century Silk Road

The 21st Century Silk Road — China’s Belt & Road Initiative [Trainees take on business]

7. All those times we’ve used a political series as an excuse to eat pizza…

Why the winner won’t take it all in tomorrow’s General Election [Trainees take on business]

8. When we realised our wizarding dreams may become a reality after being spellbound by Uber’s plans for flying cars

Uber prepares for take off [Trainees take on business]

9. When all we wanted for Christmas was commercial awareness

The Twelve “Laws” of Christmas [Trainees take on business]

10. And, last but not least, when we remembered the importance of being supportive of our friends and colleagues’ health and well-being

Supporting a mentally healthy workforce [Trainees take on business]

Subscribe to the RPC Trainees take on business blog!

The post 10 times RPC’s trainees improved your commercial awareness appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Viewing all 4559 articles
Browse latest View live