Quantcast
Channel: Solicitors – Legal Cheek
Viewing all 4559 articles
Browse latest View live

DLA in the soup over ‘wicked witch’ label for ex-client

$
0
0

Regulator called in after data retention disclosure unearths embarrassing emails

DLA copy

Global mega-law firm DLA Piper learnt yesterday that no matter how big you get, the modern world can jump up and bite you in the bum. Not only that, it can happen right back in your old hometown.

The firm — which has outposts in 30 countries and is reported to have turned over nearly £1.57 billion last year — has been reported to the professional regulator for describing a former client as a “wicked witch” and dancing on the grave of his bankrupt business.

At the crux of the tale is Steve Wilkinson, a Sheffield businessman involved in project to develop local baths in the city. At one stage he instructed DLA, which can trace its pre-global behemoth roots to Sheffield in the guises Dibb Lupton Broomhead and then Dibb Lupton Alsop.

But the tables turned. Wilkinson stopped instructing DLA and then the firm ended up on the other side in bankruptcy proceedings against the entrepreneur.

When those proceedings finally went against Wilkinson, several DLA lawyers let rip with years of pent up hostility towards the ex-client. Foolishly, they did so in writing.

According to The Times (£) newspaper yesterday, Wilkinson has reported the firm for disparaging internal comments about him after the bankruptcy finding, including an email from former partner Roger McCourt, who is alleged to have written: “The wicked witch is dead”.

In response, according to The Times, Duncan Mosley, who is still an insolvency partner at the firm, is alleged to have e-mailed:

Just made my day, Roger. Think I’ll take a wander up the road for a spa treatment at the Turkish bath suite and see if they stock any champagne to enhance the experience further.

In the old days — when the firm was still Dibb Lupton whatever — that exchange would have been conducted in the partners’ lavatories, over the gold-tapped washbasins.

But in the modern technological world, email is dangerous, not least when correspondence must be disclosed following requests under data retention legislation.

A DLA spokesman told The Times that the “comments do not reflect the standards or values of the firm or the individuals that made them.

These comments were made about an individual who, over a period of seven years, heavily contested court proceedings involving our client, but ultimately failed and judgment was made against him.

The statement continued:

He also made many disparaging and abusive statements about our personnel. We regret that the frustration caused by such circumstances was reflected in the language used about him in some internal emails between colleagues.

Meanwhile, the Solicitors Regulation Authority told the paper it would not comment on ongoing investigations.

The post DLA in the soup over ‘wicked witch’ label for ex-client appeared first on Legal Cheek.


Who is the mysterious cigar smoking London lawyer on Instagram?

$
0
0

Instagram user “Londonlawyer” is a social media mystery man — as well as a keen puffer — but is he actually a practising certificate-holder of any type?

cigar-lawyer

A mysterious cigar smoking man calling himself the Londonlawyer has amassed almost 3,000 followers on Instagram without revealing his true identity. Hinting in his online bio that his name is “Harry DB” he proclaims his love of cigars. But this is the big question for Legal Cheek: is he really a lawyer? Perhaps readers can help …

Update 16:04 — “Londonlawyer” has changed his Instagram settings to private.

He’s got all the kit

A keen swimmer, perhaps?

A photo posted by Harry DB (@londonlawyer) on

Taking cigars to Cambodia

A photo posted by Harry DB (@londonlawyer) on

Every sophisticated gentleman’s diet must include frozen yoghurt and cigars

A photo posted by Harry DB (@londonlawyer) on

Good to see he’s open to options

A photo posted by Harry DB (@londonlawyer) on

Smoking at the club?! Is that still legal?

A photo posted by Harry DB (@londonlawyer) on

Subtle hint as to the identity of our man?

A photo posted by Harry DB (@londonlawyer) on

Socks a bit garish for corporate law

A photo posted by Harry DB (@londonlawyer) on

Is he Clark Kent?

A photo posted by Harry DB (@londonlawyer) on

Enjoys a good caffeine fix

A photo posted by Harry DB (@londonlawyer) on

Buff, bearded chic: The most potentially identifying photo yet — posted this week

The post Who is the mysterious cigar smoking London lawyer on Instagram? appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Now work-experience-charging firm exposed for alleged plagiarism

$
0
0

London niche practice forced to pull training contract blurb from website after alleged striking similarities with wording of City and national firms were uncovered

Fry

It’s not been the best 10 days for niche London practice Kawa Guimaraes & Associates.

First the firm was exposed as demanding that cash-strapped wannabe solicitors pay for work placements. And this week Kawa Guimaraes faced allegations that it cuts marketing costs by plagiarising on-line content from larger counterparts.

The Canary Wharf-based employment law and clinical negligence specialist today pulled from its website careers section all information it had been promoting about its training contract scheme.

That move coincides with a report on law firm partners blog Roll on Friday that much of the content on that page bore a suspiciously strong resemblance to the wording used on similar pages by the London office of global law firm Baker & McKenzie and national practice DWF.

On training contracts:

DWF

On person requirements:

kawa

But now, anyone keen to apply for a training contract at the firm — including those poor workies that have had to hand over cash for the privilege of operating the firm’s photocopier — is met with a stark response. The training contract section of the firm’s website simply reads: “Sorry, but we couldn’t find the content you were looking for.”

filenotefoun

Neither senior partner Mehedi Rahim nor managing partner Kate Kawa responded to Legal Cheek requests for comment regarding the plagiarism allegation. However, RoF published a slightly bizarrely worded statement from the firm, which suggested that it had been the victim of allowing a third party too much unsupervised leeway.”Thank you for pointing out, which we were unaware,” read the statement.

We will look into this right away as we had delegated the work for website construction and content to outsider.

Kawa Guimaraes is not the only firm to fall into this trap recently. Last August, Legal Cheek reported on Kent-based Manak Solicitors, which embarrassingly admitted that much of its “news update” content had been nicked from BBC and Law Gazette commentator Joshua Rozenberg.

That firm also pointed the finger at clumsy web designers.

Previously

Canary Wharf law firm asks students to pay to do work experience [Legal Cheek]

The post Now work-experience-charging firm exposed for alleged plagiarism appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Twitter dismay over new justice committee chair’s defence of legal aid cuts

$
0
0

Mixed reaction on social media as former barrister and Conservative backbencher Bob Neill was unveiled as parliamentary justice committee chairman

lead

Robert Neill — a former criminal barrister at London chambers 2 Bedford Row and MP for Bromley & Chislehurst (pictured above) — was unveiled as chairman of the parliamentary justice committee yesterday morning. In a secret ballot earlier this week, Neill saw off competition from fellow Conservative and ex-SJ Berwin partner Jonathan Djanogly.

Neill — who had publicly defended former Justice Secretary Chris Grayling’s cuts to legal aid — received a mixed reaction in the Twittersphere.

Some congratulated Neill on his new role, confident he was the right man for the job.

Including — somewhat bizarrely — the Ambassador of Hungary in the UK, Peter Szabadhegy.

However, others were less enthusiastic about the new appointment, including lawyer and legal affairs commentator David Allen Green. The Twitteratti-heavyweight flagged up that Neill had previously sided with the Ministry of Justice when the last coalition government kicked off a round of swinging legal aid cuts.

Others, shared Green’s concern and suggested that Neill would stand by idly as the new Conservative government dismantled the legal aid system.

One tweeter was clearly unsure what Neill’s new role even entailed.

And one criminal barrister predicted a bleak outcome.

Neill — now 62 — studied law at the London School of Economics and was first elected as the member of parliament for Bromley & Chislehurst in June 2006.

The post Twitter dismay over new justice committee chair’s defence of legal aid cuts appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Latham & Watkins is latest US firm in London to trumpet high newly-qualified retention rate

$
0
0

Californians will keep 95% of current trainees, as Los Angeles-based practice follows Shearman & Sterling with early release of figures

Lead

An American east coast-west coast rivalry was being fought out in London this week — Wall Street white shoe firm Shearman & Sterling announced its autumn newly-qualified retention rate yesterday, so surfer dudes Latham & Watkins responded today.

But the Los Angeles-based firm fell slightly short of the 100% mark announced by the New Yorkers. Latham confirmed it was retaining 95% of its London trainees when they qualify this September.

Nonetheless, Latham’s current retention rate is an improvement on the 89% it turned in last autumn. The firm also pointed out that it has more than doubled its trainee positions over the last six years – from 10 to 21.

In the latest round, the firm is retaining 20 of 21 current trainees. However, Latham said that while it offered jobs to all trainees that applied, one had the outrageous temerity not to bid for a chilled and laid back California-style future.

A Latham statement said the greenhorn lawyers would be spread across the firm’s corporate, finance and litigation practices.

Apparently dissatisfied with the 95% retention figure, the firm’s London trainee principle and mergers acquisitions partner, Kem Ihenacho, attempted to gloss the numbers:

The 100% offer and acceptance rate reflects both the quality of our trainees and the fantastic opportunities available to talented junior lawyers here.

Clearly, the one that failed to apply is now dead to the firm.

Previously

Shearman & Sterling retains all 13 of its London trainees [Legal Cheek]

The post Latham & Watkins is latest US firm in London to trumpet high newly-qualified retention rate appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Bizarre Reed Smith tax partner rock ‘n’ roll video pulled from YouTube

$
0
0

But Legal Cheek can exclusively name the five lawyers that make Spinal Tap look as though they should have appeared at Woodstock

Lead

The IT crowd at global law firm Reed Smith was scrambled at the end of last week to douse an embarrassing brush fire that broke out on YouTube.

City of London lawyers spent a few fleeting moments on Friday morning chortling at a video posted on YouTube by the US-based firm. The clip — which starred several solicitors from the firm’s London office — was pegged to the somewhat bizarre premise that “tax lawyers are just like rock stars, but even sexier”.

It should have been blindingly obvious that anyone attempting to demonstrate that comic and ironic suggestion stands a fairly good chance of looking like an utter numpty.

Credit to legal messageboard RollOnFriday for unearthing the gem, in which five unfortunates from around the firm’s global network were somehow cajoled into dressing like Spinal Tap-style rockers.

Unfortunately, as soon as the killjoy top brass at the Fifth Avenue HQ in Pittsburgh got wind of the story, they instructed the techies to do their worst. And the video was quashed before many around the world could enjoy its full delights.

“This campaign was designed specifically for our internal audience to help raise awareness of our tax practice across the firm,” a London-based Reed Smith spokesman told Legal Cheek, adding:

As the video was only ever intended for internal use, it was removed from the YouTube site as soon as we were made aware that it was publically accessible.

However, some still images remain. And Legal Cheek can exclusively reveal the full identities of the living-on-the-edge head bangers taking part.

First up is French partner Sophie Borenstein.

Sophie

This Grace Slick lookalike joined pre-merger Richards Butler in 2003. Reed Smith hoovered up the firm four years later, and Sophie must be wondering whether the refined English outfit would have plonked her in such a silly stunt.

Next in the band’s line up is Barry Manilow-wannabe, partner Caspar Fox.

Casper

Caspar heads the whole European tax shooting match for Reed Smith, having done stints previously at Eversheds and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer. He clearly left those firms owing to their lack of rock ‘n’ roll fun.

Fox is followed by London partner colleague Simon Gough, who seems to have had a misspent youth in north London with Madness’s Suggsie.

Simon

Gough only recently joined Reed Smith — perhaps he was lured by the prospect of producing the video — having done time previously at DLA Piper and Denton Wilde Sapte.

Thomas Gierath adds another dose of Euro-pop to the mix.

Thomas

The Munich-based partner and German lawyer definitely looks like the type of character that Antoine de Caunes would have taken a keen interest in.

Speaking of the renowned presenter of cult classic Eurotrash, the Reed Smith rockers are rounded out with a Frenchman. Or at least we think they are.

stephane

Partner Stephane Letranchant coyly declines to publish a mug-shot on the firm’s lawyer profile section. However, with the help of Uncle Google, Legal Cheek has produced this image of a man who sees himself as the Ozzy Osbourne of the legal profession.

As for the mystery man sixth member of the band — who resembles something of a bespectacled Chris Martin/Coldplay character — the hunt continues.

The post Bizarre Reed Smith tax partner rock ‘n’ roll video pulled from YouTube appeared first on Legal Cheek.

What are the best alternatives for students turned off the bar due to lack of pupillages and legal aid cuts?

$
0
0

Top solicitors and barristers advise undergrads at Legal Cheek Careers at Inner Temple

Yesterday five leading lawyers spent an hour fielding questions from more than 100 undergraduate students at Inner Temple‘s annual careers day.

All the panelists had an interest in advocacy but had opted to pursue careers outside the Inns of Court; they spent the session giving the audience of wannabe lawyers a sense of the many options available to them at a time when pupillage numbers have fallen below the 400 mark but City law firms are thriving.

Shearman & Sterling partner Mark Soundy explained how he wanted to be a barrister before he discovered his passion for dealmaking. King & Wood Mallesons‘ Jeremy Consitt went one step further, qualifying as a barrister before finding his feet working in law firms and becoming a solicitor specialising in employment litigation.

The audience also heard how the early advocacy forays of Mayer Brown solicitor-advocate and partner Angus Duncan have since evolved into a career overseeing the tactical side of high value insurance litigation. And City University Law School pro bono chief Sarwan Singh spoke of his journey from the bar to academia, via lengthy stints working in-house in law centres and local government.

Finally, Tom Leech QC talked to the students about life as an in-house barrister in Herbert Smith Freehills‘ advocacy unit. Watch the quintet impart their hard-earned wisdom in the video above.

Legal Cheek Careers‘ session was part of the wider Inner Temple undergraduate careers day. Check out the #QandAIT hashtag for tweets from the event.

For more from the panellists, read the articles they wrote for Legal Cheek in advance of the event

Mark Soundy: What I wish I’d known when starting my career as a City solicitor

Jeremy Consitt: The hard route to becoming a City lawyer

Angus Duncan: I wouldn’t recommend studying law as an undergraduate if you want to be a lawyer

Sarwan Singh: 7 pieces of advice I’d give to my junior barrister self

Tom Leech QC: To be a good advocate you need courage above all

The post What are the best alternatives for students turned off the bar due to lack of pupillages and legal aid cuts? appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Ex-City solicitor in crosshairs over alleged VE Day demonstration vandalism

$
0
0

From the Square Mile to anti-capitalist campaigner in just three years

Lead

Police are reported to have in their crosshairs a former City lawyer who appears to have turned into a Che Guevara-style anti-capitalist revolutionary.

Until three years ago, by day Samir Dathi was a buttoned up, suited and booted Square Mile lawyer practising at commercial, charities and private client-specialist firm Royds, which is based in the shadow of St Paul’s Cathedral.

However, media reports yesterday suggested that Dathi — formerly a family law specialist — has been leading a double life and that London’s Metropolitan Police want to interview him regarding allegations of public order offences and criminal damage during last month’s VE Day commemoration celebrations.

Dathi’s Twitter handle is MegaLotusEater and his profile on the site describes him as a “former SOAS [School of African and Oriental Studies at London University] student, freedom of information lawyer and socialist. Anti-war, anti-austerity”.

twitter

Dathi’s LinkedIn profile (pictured below) still lists him as practising at Royds. And indeed, Internet searches of his name and that of the firm produced a live profile page on the Royds’ website.

Linkedin

However, today the firm whipped that page from view. Neither the Law Society nor Royds itself lists Dathi as currently practising at the firm.

His LinkedIn profile indicates that Dathi read law at Kings College, University of London, between 1998 and 2001.

A report in yesterday’s Mail Online said the City lawyer is 36 years old and that “until recently” he practised at Royds. The newspaper went on to claim that it secretly filmed Dathi giving “a speech to rabble-rousers planning to hijack [last weekend’s] anti-austerity rally in central London”.

The Mail also claimed that “Dathi was one of 16 who police wanted to talk to” in relation to allegations around the vandalising last month of a Whitehall memorial to women who served in the Second World War.

At the time of going to press, the most recent posts on Dathi’s Twitter feed suggested the police might have already interviewed him, although that point remains unclear.

In a statement issued within the last few minutes, Royds confirmed that Dathi joined the firm in April 2007 as an assistant solicitor in the family department. He left the practice in the summer of 2012.

Said the firm:

His resignation was tendered in order, as we understood at that time, to further pursue his studies. Royds have not been contacted by the police in relation to this matter and have not had any contact with Mr Dathi since his leaving the firm.

Dathi did not respond to Legal Cheek’s efforts to contact him today.

The post Ex-City solicitor in crosshairs over alleged VE Day demonstration vandalism appeared first on Legal Cheek.


Nabarro’s revenue rockets by 21%, but junior lawyer pay rises struggle at 3%

$
0
0

And trainees get a big fat zilch as London firm takes restrained view to remuneration at bottom of the pile

lead

London-based Nabarro has jumped on the junior lawyer pay-rise bandwagon, announcing yesterday a relatively restrained and modest 3% increase.

And in a demonstration of management caution, the firm confirmed that starting salaries for trainee solicitors would not rise at all.

The move comes on the back of figures released the day before showing the firm’s revenue for 2014/15 grew by 8% to £126 million. It was, said a firm statement, Nabarro’s largest year-on-year increase since 2008 and the pre-global financial crisis glory days.

The profit per partner at the firm is up by a healthy 21%, meaning average full-equity drawings were more than £575,000.

But increases at the junior level were much thinner. Trainees qualifying this year will see salaries increase by £2,000 to £61,000. Those with one to two years’ post-qualification experience will also be handed an extra £2,000, take them to £66,500.

Those at the top end of the junior lawyer bracket — nine-plus years’ PQE, will bag an extra grand — with the £3,000 rise taking them to £95,000.

Speaking after the release of the firm’s annual results, senior partner Graham Stedman commented:

I am pleased with our best set of results since 2008 and the positive progress Nabarro is making on many fronts. Teams right across the firm have worked hard and we have recognised their efforts by rewarding associates with over £1m in bonuses this year. In addition, our work on the profitability of the firm has delivered another strong PEP performance, which this year is combined with significant turnover growth.

The post Nabarro’s revenue rockets by 21%, but junior lawyer pay rises struggle at 3% appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Smooth-talking Gove charms lawyers over legal aid reforms and rule of law

$
0
0

Social media commentators almost fall in love with new Justice Secretary, primarily because he’s not Chris Grayling

Speech

The legal profession learnt an important lesson about Michael Gove today. While his immediate predecessor, Chris Grayling, was a head-banging bruiser, Gove is a far more intellectual, sophisticated, subtle charmer.

Many lawyers gratefully gobbled up Gove’s early morning speech today, his first as Justice Secretary and Lord Chancellor since taking office after last month’s surprise general election victory for the Conservatives.

So used to having Grayling club them around the head and shoulders, some legal profession commentators seemed positively wooed by the former Times newspaper leader writer.

Blackstone Chambers’ Dinah Rose QC — who has acted for the Law Society in judicial review challenges to legal aid reforms and criticised the last government’s cuts — was one lawyer that went a bit weak at the knees when Gove purred this morning.

Likewise, law Twitteratai firebrand David Allen Green — a media specialist solicitor at London firm Preiskel & Co and a long-standing Grayling critic — was also partially sympathetic, albeit in the guise of his alter-ego, Jack of Kent.

Even Keir Starmer — the former Director of Public Prosecutions and recently elected Labour MP — seemed prepared to stand Gove a pint down the local.

What’s more, the Justice Secretary had the establishment legal profession press wrapped round his finger. This hack from the Law Gazette appeared on the verge of asking Gove to join in a game of Saturday park footie.

In the real world outside the social media bubble, Bar Council Chairman Alistair MacDonald QC, also enthused. “It is very encouraging”, said the New Park Court chambers man.

Macdonald continued:

That [the Justice Secretary] has recognised the importance of the rule of law as the most precious asset of a civilised society and the importance of a healthy independent bar to ensure high quality advocacy. In addition, the secretary of state has emphasised the importance of legal aid as a vital element in a fair justice system.

What has this freshly minted Ministry of Justice Svengali said to win such plaudits, whereas his predecessor was vilified to the point that protestors crafted a grotesque papier-mâché Grayling head that was paraded around the streets of London town?

Here’s a selection of honey-coated quotes from Gove’s speech this morning:

Making the case for the rule of law as an institution which safeguards progressive values is my mission.

The rule of law is the most precious asset of any civilised society. It is the rule of law which protects the weak from the assault of the strong; which safeguards the private property on which all prosperity depends; which makes sure that when those who hold power abuse it, they can be checked; which protects family life and personal relations from coercion and aggression; which underpins the free speech on which all progress — scientific and cultural — depends; and which guarantees the essential liberty that allows us all as individuals to flourish.

Fine words, but what about specifics? Grayling continued a process — which, to be fair, was initiated by the preceding Labour government — of slashing legal aid. What’s Mellow Michael’s view?

Legal aid is a vital element in any fair justice system. There is a responsibility on government to make sure that those in the greatest hardship — at times of real need — are provided with the resources to secure access to justice. Change was required to save money — no minister in this government can avoid thinking hard about how to deal with the massive deficit. But I am also committed to making sure that we protect access to justice for everyone accused of a crime, and safeguard and improve the quality of the legal advice and advocacy in our criminal courts.

And then Gove continued with his campaign of the last fortnight of batting eyelashes at the bar.

I am particularly keen to make sure that the highest quality advocates are instructed in all cases, and have set in train immediate work to address the problems described in Sir Bill Jeffrey’s report on criminal advocacy last year.

He went on:

And I want to make sure that once these changes to criminal legal aid are in place, we will monitor their effects to make sure that justice and fairness are served. That is why we will review the impact of these changes both on the quality of advocacy and access to justice and why I am determined to do everything I can to protect and enhance both.

Is Gove the progressive, thinking lawyer’s bit of crumpet? Thousands of teachers across the land would wryly warn lawyers not to be seduced by the man they battled with during his time as Education Secretary.

And indeed, just how committed is he to liberal principles of the rule of law? This morning’s speech was delivered at the Legatum Institute in London, about which Gove waxed lyrical before getting stuck into the meat of his message.

Legatum is a Dubai-based private investment business, which, in addition to sponsoring the London institute, also finances the Legatum Center for Development and Entrepreneurship at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Undoubtedly, those behind Legatum have the best of intentions. But any association with the potentates running the United Arab Emirates — where the rule of law has a considerably different meaning — raises questions.

Ultimately, British lawyers are likely to continue to be wary of the company Gove keeps — and more importantly to measure his smooth words against actual deeds.

Read Gove’s speech in full below:

Gove speech in full

Image via @JoshuaRozenberg

The post Smooth-talking Gove charms lawyers over legal aid reforms and rule of law appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Weil keeps pace with US rivals, offering jobs to all nine qualifying lawyers

$
0
0

New York-based firm announced today it will keep 100% of its London spring and autumn 2015 NQs

Weil

Manhattan-headquartered corporate powerhouse Weil Gotshal & Manges will keep all nine of its trainees, the firm announced today.

The latest batch of City lawyers — some of whom qualified back in March of this year — will be spread across departments at the firm’s Fetter Lane offices in London.

The newly qualified associates, who will begin life on healthy annual salaries of £95,500 — more than doubling their trainee whacks — will join a variety of practice areas, including corporate, banking, private funds and tax.

Weil’s strong retention figure follows similar announcements last week from fellow US firms Latham & Watkins, which kept 95% of its trainee cohort, and Shearman & Sterling, which retained all 13 of its autumn qualifiers.

Weil’s graduate recruitment partner Jonathan Wood commented:

We are delighted that, as in previous years, all of our trainees qualifying in September have accepted offers from their chosen practice areas and will be continuing on with the firm following their qualification.

The development came in the wake of recent bad press for Weil. The firm was forced to issue a grovelling apology earlier this year after an internal April Fool’s gag fell flat with staff.

An email poking fun at associates’ work-life balance was met with harsh criticism and anger, presumably leaving Manhattan-based “chief talent officer” and author of the email, Lisa Cuevas, unwelcome in the staff canteen for the foreseeable future.

Previously:

Latham & Watkins is latest US firm in London to trumpet high newly-qualified retention rate [Legal Cheek]

The post Weil keeps pace with US rivals, offering jobs to all nine qualifying lawyers appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Large arse spotted at global law firm, shock

$
0
0

Fears abounded that this “Playboy” image could have caused Clifford Chance’s diversity supremo to lose some sleep

lead

Not for the first time, some might suggest, a large arse has been parading around the corridors of a global law firm.

But this one is not barking orders at junior associates — who will then pass the grief down to trainees and paralegals — but is instead a piece of art by Russian photographer Vlad Loktev.

Nonetheless, the photo — entitled Playboy 2002 — seems to be weighing down the hard-pressed junior lawyer/secretary at Clifford Chance’s Moscow office.

art

And just what the firm’s global diversity, equality and inclusion senior executive will make of an image of an arguably male-perspective objectified female form is anyone’s guess. Yet again, Legal Cheek pondered on the perils of being a cross-cultural global law firm.

Although in this instance, blushes are spared and the diversity and inclusion guru has not been presented with a long-term problem. It is understood that the artwork is the personal property of an unidentified Moscow staffer — purchased at a charity auction and delivered to the office — and will not be hanging on the CC walls at its Gasheka St hub.

Loktev himself is something of a celebrity snapper in Russia — taking portraits of the great and the good from politicians to artists to sportsmen.

The image was posted on Instagram a few days ago, when the mystery CC staffer seemed pretty chuffed to have bagged this cheeky example of Loktev’s oeuvre, proudly declaring “we love art”. Although, to be fair, this arse looks as though it could send the woman lugging it for a session with Vlad the osteopath.

However, the law firm art-lover has since had a dose of cold feet and removed this image from her Instagram account. Fortunately, the Legal Cheek tech department has saved a version for Russian legal profession posterity …

The post Large arse spotted at global law firm, shock appeared first on Legal Cheek.

A dozen law-related tunes to beat the training contract application blues

$
0
0

The Judge trawls through his — and his mates’ — old vinyl collections in search of a soundtrack to ease the stress

dj

It’s a pretty bleak vista. Lying out ahead of wannabe solicitors for as far as the eye can see are fields of training contract application forms.

You’ve set yourself a target of one a day for 10 days. It’s a marathon — and there is no guarantee of any euphoria at the end. So you need some sort of tonic to dull the pain.

Well, there’s nothing like music to raise the spirits. Legal Cheek presents The Judge’s dozen law-related tunes to get you through the training contract application blues.

The Clash I fought the law

We kick off with an obvious choice, but it’s one hell of a barnstormer. The Clash’s 1979 version is arguably the most famous — and probably best for application purposes. From the initial drum roll intro that kicks into Joe Strummer’s aggressive vocals, the rendition never slows down

But The Clash cover is by no means the only option. The song was written and recorded 20 years earlier by Sonny Curtis and The Crickets. The first significant cover came in 1966 with a version by the Bobby Fuller Four. Many others have latched onto the tune, not least cult San Francisco punk band the Dead Kennedys with a 1987 recording.

Notable lyric: “Robin’ people with a six-gun …” — which is what wannabe solicitors will be reduced to doing if those training contract applications come to nought.

Jackson Browne Lawyers in love

Written by one of the princes of 1970s middle-of-the-road California rock, Jackson Browne, this song appeared on his 1983 album of the same name.

It too kicks off with a big drumbeat, but is likely to disappoint over the remaining four minutes. Not a patch on “Running on Empty”.

Notable lyric: “Waiting for World War III while Jesus slaves, To the mating calls of lawyers in love.”

George Harrison Sue me, sue you blues

The Beatles had one of the most high profile and spectacular break-ups in pop music history (see “You Never Give me Your Money” below). Lennon and McCartney set their wives and girlfriends on each other and much blood was spilt.

And of course the lawyers got involved. For the most part Harrison and Starkey (er, isn’t that Ringo? Ed) tried to keep their heads down. But George was hardly unscathed. As a result, he penned this catchy ditty for his 1973 album “Living in the Material World”. Far from his best work, but fun, nonetheless.

Notable lyric: “Hold the block on money flow, I move it into joint escrow, Court receiver, laughs and thrills, But in the end we just pay those lawyers their bills.”

Johnny Cash On this side of the law

Part of the man in black’s myth is that he had plenty of youthful scraps with the law himself. Marketing or reality, he certainly made a career of singing about the law, and this number is from his 1964 soundtrack album for the film of the same name, starring Gregory Peck.

Notable lyric: “Who is weak? Who is strong? Who is for and who’s against the law?”

Kitty Wells Will your lawyer talk to God?

It’s a fair bet that not many Legal Cheek devotees will be overly familiar with US country singer Kitty Wells, but she had a good stretch in the fifties and sixties.

Born Ellen Muriel Deason in the home of country, Nashville in Tennessee, Wells is considered to be a trailblazer in breaking down what was a male hegemony in that genre. This short tale of woe comes from Wells’s 1964 album “Especially for You”.

Notable lyric: “Will your lawyer talk to God and plead your case up on high, And defend the way you broke my heart in two?”

Warren Zevon Lawyers, guns and money

Warren Zevon — who died 12 years ago from cancer aged only 56 — was one of the funniest rock and rollers of the 1970s.

Many will know his 1978 song “Werewolves of London”, from the “Excitable Boy” album. But perhaps even more entertaining — and with a better tune — is this track from the same album.

It relates the story of an episode in Cuba. Zevon and his manager were in a cab, when the latter announced abruptly that they needed to make a quick stop. Zevon claimed the manager rushed into a house and emerged seconds later with a woman he explained to be his sister — who had been kidnapped.

Pursued by banditos as the cab sped away, the manager is reputed to have said to Zevon: “Call my dad and tell him to send some lawyers.” Warren replied: “Yeah, and some guns and money.”

Notable lyric: “I went home with the waitress, The way I always do.”

Belle and Sebastian Legal man

“Belle and Sebastian’s jolly sing-along from the band’s 2005 compilation album “Push Barman to Open Old Wounds” is — in keeping with the Scottish outfit’s wider baroque style — one of only a few erudite satires of legal form in pop music.

It’s short — one verse and a couple of choruses — but it skips along musically, while being lyrically fairly clever in its references to contractual terms.

Notable lyric: “Get out of the city and into the sunshine, get out of the office and into the springtime.”

Fountains of Wayne California sex lawyer

Call their style “power pop” or “alternative rock”, New York band Fountains of Wayne has been around for the best part of two decades.

This number — in which the singer fantasies about heading to the west coast with his girl and a dog named Doug to join a specific branch of the legal profession — comes from the band’s 2005 album “Out of State Plates”.

Bassist Adam Schlesinger is reported to have explained the song’s origins thus: “Our attorney Josh Grier works at a big fancy law firm with a big fancy waiting room. One day we were sitting there waiting and there was a magazine called California Lawyer on the coffee table facing us. [Fellow band member Chris Collingwood] said, apropos of nothing, ‘California sex lawyer’.

“Perhaps it was only because we were sitting in a quiet office, but at the time it seemed like the funniest thing in the world. Why it needed to be turned into a song, I’m still not sure.”

Notable lyric: “I’m gunna do some damage, Gunna bust some heads, I’m gunna go the distance, Then I’m going to bed.”

Tom Paxton One million lawyers

Now 77 years old, Chicago-born Tom Paxton has been a feature on the American folk scene for more than half a century. His songs have been recorded by the great and the good, including Bob Dylan, Pete Seeger and Dolly Parton.

He wrote this track 30 years ago, when there was much disquiet among the US chattering classes over the fact that the number of lawyers in the country was about to hit the 1 million mark. According to the American Bar Association, as of last year, there are more than 1.28 million practising in the US. Perhaps it’s time for a rewrite, Tom.

Notable lyric: “In ten years we’re gonna have one million lawyers, How much can a poor nation stand?”


And now for three songs that don’t have that much to do with lawyers or the law, apart from a passing reference. However, they are included simply because the Judge reckons they are absolute crackers.

Elton John Mona Lisas and Mad Hatters

One of the lesser known Elton John/Bernie Taupin numbers, it appears on John’s classic 1972 album “Honky Chateau”.

Notable lyric: Sons of bankers, sons of lawyers, Turn around and say good morning to the night. For unless they see the sky, But they can’t and that is why, They know not if it’s dark outside or light.”

Bob Dylan Hurricane

Rock and roll’s greatest poet Bob Dylan released this ode to US boxer Ruben Carter as a single in 1975 before incorporating it on his seminal 1976 album “Desire”.

Notable lyric: “Now all the criminals in their coats and their ties, Are free to drink martinis and watch the sun rise. While Rubin sits like Buddha in a ten-foot cell. An innocent man in a living hell.”

The Beatles You never give me your money

As mentioned earlier, the mop-top Scousers didn’t have the highest opinion of the legal profession, not least when the band was at each other’s throats during the recording of the Abbey Road album in 1969. The Beatles restrained themselves to a fleeting reference in this tune to the legal troubles.

Notable lyric: “You never give me your money, You only give me your funny paper. And in the middle of negotiations, You break down …”

Good luck with those training contract applications.

The post A dozen law-related tunes to beat the training contract application blues appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Top white-collar crime QC entangled in online intern swap embarrassment

$
0
0

Lawyers are flocking to recently launched site in a bid to bag little Hugo and Henrietta pre-gap yah work experience. But is this just hi-tech nepotism?

featured

A top criminal law barrister has denied that he planned to circumvent his chambers’ formal mini-pupillage application process by signing up to a recently launched website that matches professional parents looking to swap work experience gigs for their children.

Julian Christopher QC of 5 Paper Buildings in the Temple acknowledged to Legal Cheek yesterday that he had made an entry on the site (pictured below), called myInternSwap.com, in a bid to find his 17-year-old son, who is currently at the City of London School (annual fees: £15,000), a placement at … well … almost anywhere.

5Paper

In exchange, Christopher (pictured below) indicated that he would offer the child of the parent laying on the work experience for his son a week’s stint at chambers.

barrister

However, mini-pupillages have become increasingly popular first steps to full pupillages at the bar, even though they bear a strong resemblance to good old fashioned work experience. Nonetheless, 5PB runs a strict application process for mini-pupillages. According to the set’s website:

Due to the increasing number of students expressing an interest in experiencing a mini-pupillage at 5 Paper Buildings, it has recently been decided to formalise the application process.

The chambers has put in place two “windows” for mini-pupillages — 1 February to 31 August, with an applications deadline of 30 November; and 1 September to 31 January, with a deadline of 31 May.

Commenting to Legal Cheek, Christopher said:

I can confirm that I did place the entry … However, I have not made use of the website, and would not do so without putting an applicant through the formal application process.

Since Legal Cheek contacted Christopher yesterday, his entry on the site has been deleted.

However, Christopher is by no means the only senior member of the legal profession to have touted work experience offers on the site. He’s just the only one so far to put his full name to an entry.

Indeed, lawyers are flocking to what is billed as “the new old boys’ network” in the hope bagging their children all-important work experience. But some might suggest that it just looks like a modern, hi-tech version of old man nepotism.

MyInternSwap.com allows professional parents to contact each other directly to exchange work experience opportunities for their offspring, presumably with the possibility of circumventing lengthy application processes and continued knock-backs.

Another internship that was up for grabs on the work-experience site yesterday (pictured below) — but since deleted — was listed at US corporate-finance law firm Dechert.

The user named “Adam” offers up to one week of valuable experience at the firm’s London office, providing the other side can offer the Dechert lawyer’s 16-year-old — who attends all-girls St Margaret’s School in Hertfordhsire — some experience in marketing or publishing.

Dechert

Even esteemed members of the judiciary couldn’t resist the site. One post claims to be from a judge “specialising in family law” matters.

Offering flexible experience for one lucky candidate, the anonymous judge is seeking an internship for a 17-year-old offspring focusing on areas including medicine, science and arts.

Intern

A host of other postings from anonymous lawyers can be found on the site, offering time at their offices in return for sons or daughters gaining valuable work experience elsewhere.

According to the Guardian newspaper, the brainchild behind the site, Nick Simmons — who runs a design agency in London’s Notting Hill — was inspired to create MyInternSwap.com when his daughter Izzy told him her friend Marina was looking for some work experience in the design industry.

He told the Guardian:

I agreed to give Marina a placement, and by way of saying thank you her mother found Izzy experience at the thinktank where she worked.

Simmons continued:

It’s a tool we hope will kick the old boy network into touch and help democratise the process of securing valuable work experience. This is not a zero-sum game, and myInternSwap is not cannibalising a fixed pool of placements.

According to Simmons, those from less-advantaged backgrounds will be able to use the service for free. That is, presuming those parents have a family member or friend in a position to offer internships.

The post Top white-collar crime QC entangled in online intern swap embarrassment appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Criminal law juniors take another knock as Supreme Court green-lights QASA

$
0
0

Attempt to block controversial advocacy assessment regime loses final judicial review hurdle today

wig-rubbish

Wannabe and junior barristers will fear that the Supreme Court has hammered another nail in the coffin of the criminal bar, when judges ruled today that a controversial assessment regime could be given the green light.

The quality assurance scheme for advocates (QASA) — which has the backing of the Legal Services Board and the frontline individual professional regulators — will put in place a tiered system of advocacy assessment.

Young criminal barristers in particular feel threatened by the proposed regime, as one of the steps to be authorised to continue in practise is completion of four assessed Crown Court trials within a set period.

With an increasing crunch on legal aid rates resulting in criminal solicitors’ firms keeping advocacy work in house, there are fears that young barristers will not be able to meet the requirement within the defined timeframe.

Four barristers — Tom de la Mare QC, Tom Richards and Jana Sadler-Forster of Blackstone Chambers, along with Mark Trafford QC of 23 Essex Street Chambers — brought a judicial review challenge to the proposed QASA system.

They have now lost at every stage and the LSB said today the regime was on track for implementation.

However, the appellants’ law firm — the City of London office of global giant Baker & McKenzie — attempted to put a gloss on the Supreme Court ruling.

Partner Joanna Ludlam said:

Whilst we are disappointed with today’s outcome, the judgment shows that the Supreme Court justices found in favour of our submissions on the law. This will force the regulators to think seriously about future developments of QASA and will help achieve a scheme which better serves the interests of the public and the legal profession.

The Baker McKenzie partner maintained today’s judgment was “groundbreaking” in that “it has set a new legal precedent and will henceforth be a leading authority on the application of the principle of proportionality of EU Law”.

According to the appellants’ lawyers, the ruling enshrined in English law “our interpretation of the important EU principle of proportionality”.

That principle requires that EU law does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objectives of EU treaties. However, a Baker & McKenzie statement said:

It is a relatively vague concept and there has been confusion about how it applies in practice, and whether the court should be assessing the question for itself, or deferring to decision makers’ better judgment.

According to the firm, the Supreme Court used the QASA case to assess how to establish whether a measure is proportionate. The court must consider: whether the measure in question is suitable or appropriate to achieve the objective pursued; and whether the measure is necessary to achieve that objective, or whether it could be obtained by a less onerous method.

“The Supreme Court provided extensive, useful commentary on what these questions mean in practice,” said the Baker & McKenzie team.

All of which will be of relatively cold technical comfort to the appellants and junior criminal law barristers.

Welcoming today’s ruling, LSB chief executive Richard Moriarty said:

QASA is proportionate as a scheme, and that the LSB acted lawfully in granting the application made to it.

He continued:

Throughout this process, there has been consensus about how important competent advocacy is in supporting the rule of law. My firm expectation, now that we have clarity on legality, is that the regulators … will proceed with implementing the scheme to assure the public of the competence of criminal advocates.

Read the judgement in full below:

QASA Judgement

The post Criminal law juniors take another knock as Supreme Court green-lights QASA appeared first on Legal Cheek.


Liverpool lawyers defy bar chiefs to launch criminal courts strike

$
0
0

Local barristers are refusing to take new instructions from beginning of July in fight against legal aid cuts

Cuts

Lawyers in the home of English militancy are today leading in the fight against government cuts to criminal legal aid rates by refusing to take instructions from the beginning of next month.

In a move that could bring criminal courts in the north-west to a grinding halt within days, solicitors and barristers in Liverpool have banded together in protest against the latest rounds of cuts to criminal legal aid rates.

Last week, the new Justice Secretary and Lord Chancellor, Michael Gove, confirmed that a forecast second tranche of 17.5% cuts would be implemented on the rates received by solicitors’ firms. But Gove announced that mooted cuts to criminal advocacy rates had been put on the back burner.

That move was interpreted as a Ministry of Justice bid to drive a wedge between the two branches of the profession. But it doesn’t seem to have worked on Merseyside.

Releasing a joint statement from local solicitors and barristers, Zoe Gascoyne, chairwoman of Liverpool Law Society’s criminal practice committee and a partner at Quinn Melville, and barrister Daniel Travers of Exchange Chambers, announced a go-slow from next month.

Their statement reads:

The bar confirmed that they would not be prepared to undertake any work on any case with a rep order [Legal Aid Agency instructions] dated on or after Wednesday 1st July in recognition of the damage that these cuts will have upon the independent bar. It was further proposed that the bar would re-introduce the no returns policy for all existing cases in the Crown Court from Wednesday the 1st July.

The move will put Liverpool barristers at odds with their national representative body, the Criminal Bar Association, which last week said it was doing nothing more than pondering the possibility of calling for action.

The Liverpool lawyers emphasised that they were not against modernisation, but that, in their view, criminal rates had already been cut to the bone.

“We … wish to make it known that as an area we are keen to embrace innovation and change that leads to increased efficiencies,” their statement went on, pointing out that local lawyers participated in a pilot for the early guilty plea scheme, before continuing:

We make this point to show that we are not resistant to new ideas. However we simply cannot understand how the Lord Chancellor envisages reforming a system in which he is cutting beyond all reasonable levels, the fees, of the very people who are essential for delivery and implementation.

Read the statement in full below:

Joint Statement of Merseyside Solicitors and Barristers

The post Liverpool lawyers defy bar chiefs to launch criminal courts strike appeared first on Legal Cheek.

German bar association puts hands up to online hoax that went viral

$
0
0

Lawyers in The Fatherland confound stereotypes by producing a vaguely funny video about the perils of not seeking legal advice when divorcing

Hoax

A body representing thousands of German lawyers this week played a practical joke on millions of Internet users by publishing a video putatively featuring a disgruntled husband sawing his possessions in half in a bizarre divorce settlement.

The video — which appeared on Youtube last week — was titled “Für Laura” and went viral on sites including Reddit. It has has received more than 6 million views to date.

The 1’35” clip opens with homemade-style credits and introduction in German. With the help of the bods over at Legal Cheek’s languages department, the introduction translates as:

Thank you for 12 ‘beautiful’ years Laura !!!!! You’ve really earned half; greetings to my successor.

Viewers are then treated to low quality footage of a chap named “Martin G” hacking items of property in half after the apparent breakdown of his 12-year marriage. Martin can be seen using various power tools as he neatly chops up a range of items, including chairs, an iPhone and even a car.

chair

After news outlets around the world rushed to report on the viral hit, it now appears the whole thing was an elaborate and ingeniously conceived PR stunt.

The marketing gurus over at Deutsche Anwaltauskunft — an online legal magazine linked to the German Bar Association — have admitted all on their website, with a blog entitled “Confession: We are Martin G”.

The online mea culpa — which appeared over the weekend — details the viral vid’s aim, which was to point out humorously that not enough couples take legal precautions in the event of separation.

A spokesman for the German Bar Association told Deutsche Anwaltauskunft:

We are very pleased and would have never expected that our message could reach millions of people worldwide in such a short period of time. No one here expected the numerous interview requests about the fake story and fake divorced husband Martin G. from all parts of the world.

If you’re in the market for half a TV, the items used in the publicity stunt are currently up for grabs on ebay, with all proceeds going to charities.

Legal Cheek awaits a Bar Council-produced video of a fictional happy-slapping of Michael Gove to reach the worldwideweb in a bid to raise awareness of legal aid cuts.

Watch the video in full below:

The post German bar association puts hands up to online hoax that went viral appeared first on Legal Cheek.

‘Hunt the partner’: Top London media firm makes trainees play Hide and Seek with ‘disguised’ senior lawyers

$
0
0

News of Clintons’ bizarre Covent Garden game leaks on Instagram

Hide&Seek

Pity the poor trainees at Clintons.

Spurred by the promise of representing top showbiz stars, they overcame hundreds of other media law hopefuls in order to land one of the coveted pair of training contracts offered each year by the central London law firm.

Cue a glamorous life on the sunlit uplands of law as legal advisors to Clintons’ varied stable of celeb clients, including Shane Richie, Paul Weller and EastEnders’ Jessie Wallace.

But that’s only one part of the deal. The other is, er, adult hide and seek … in which Clintons’ trainees are encouraged to hunt for disguised partners in the Covent Garden area around the firm’s office

Note, by the way, the excellently-drafted ‘Hunt the partner’ rules, complete with sub-clauses, for Tuesday’s fixture.

hunt-the-partner

Happily, the trainee who leaked the document on Instagram this week seems to be putting on a brave face.

hunt-2

When contacted by Legal Cheek yesterday afternoon, Clintons declined to issue a comment.

The post ‘Hunt the partner’: Top London media firm makes trainees play Hide and Seek with ‘disguised’ senior lawyers appeared first on Legal Cheek.

How ex-Linklaters solicitor Julia Salasky created a start-up to crowdfund justice

$
0
0

Is this the future in a world where legal aid is almost non-existent for challenging fundamental human rights issues?

Podcast

Two Midlands pensioners in their eighties thrust legal sector crowd-funding into the spotlight earlier this week.

Thomas Middleton — a former RAF serviceman and retired businessman — is aiming to raise funds to challenge rules implemented by Derby City Council that dictate his behaviour when visiting his wife of 67 years, who is in a care home suffering from dementia.

The case is complex and highly sensitive, with strong arguments on both sides. However, for lawyers it has highlighted gaps in legal aid funding for the non-affluent middle class.

Attempting to fill the gap in this case is a crowd-funding scheme that was launched only a month ago.

CrowdJustice is the brainchild of former City of London solicitor Julia Salasky, who qualified into the litigation department at magic circle law firm Linklaters in 2012 before moving to the in-house legal team at the United Nations.

But Salasky is now almost entirely devoted to this innovative project, which many might see as the future of funding for public interest litigation that falls outside the ever-narrowing parameters of legal aid eligibility.

The site currently has three cases open for funding. Apart from the Middleton action, it is promoting a case involving allegedly hazardous landfill in Lancashire and a challenge to British oil exploration in Colombia.

The Middleton case has a target of £4,000 and is nearly 30% funded after having been open to contributions for the last week. The Lancashire case is 10% funded so far, while the Colombia oil exploration challenge has exceeded its £5,000 target.

Salasky’s online platform has been compared with more commercially driven and bigger third-parting litigation funding operations. But she points to a crucial difference — financial contributors to her cases are exempt from negative costs orders as the funds are effective cash gifts to the claimants, who bear liability if they lose the actions.

Julia Salasky came into the Legal Cheek studio yesterday to discuss her project.

The post How ex-Linklaters solicitor Julia Salasky created a start-up to crowdfund justice appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Pride 2015: Profession pays tribute to ‘Legal Heroes’ who’ve championed LGBT rights

$
0
0

Lawyers contribute to carnival atmosphere at London Pride march buoyed by US Supreme Court backing of gay marriage

Here come the lawyers! #prideinlondon

A video posted by Legal Cheek (@legalcheek) on

Members of the legal profession were out in force on Saturday at Pride in London, the annual Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) parade through the capital.

Walking behind a huge purple banner emblazoned with scales of justice, the crowd of solicitors and barristers wowed the crowd with that old lawyer favourite, the horsehair wig, while seeking to draw attention to the #LegalHeroes campaign being run to highlight key contributions to gay rights.

Among the 18 “legal heroes” named on the Law Society’s website is No5 barrister S Chelvan, a champion of LGBTI rights among asylum seekers and migrants, who was in attendance at the parade.

Other participants included Bar Council chair Alistair MacDonald QC, Law Society chief executive Catherine Dixon and former Law Society president Lucy Scott-Moncrieff (pictured below, from left to right).

pride-2015-3

Legal Cheek caught up with the lawyers as they headed noisily down Regent Street at a jubilant procession buoyed by Friday’s decision of the US Supreme Court to legalise gay marriage across all states.

pride2015-lead640

And to crown the day, this correspondent even managed to get a #LegalHeroes sticker for his Lord Denning T-shirt — courtesy of Bircham Dyson Bell solicitor Kevin Poulter.

Read about the Law Society’s LGBTI legal heroes here.

The post Pride 2015: Profession pays tribute to ‘Legal Heroes’ who’ve championed LGBT rights appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Viewing all 4559 articles
Browse latest View live