Quantcast
Channel: Solicitors – Legal Cheek
Viewing all 4559 articles
Browse latest View live

Modern lawyers are far too specialised, says Supreme Court judge

$
0
0

First Jonathan Sumption QC laid into law degrees, now he’s criticising qualified lawyers for being narrow minded

sumption-lead

Specialisation is anathema to the forging of good lawyers, a Supreme Court judge pontificated at the weekend, adding fuel to a currently blazing debate around the relative merits of law degrees and the conversion course.

Jonathan Sumption QC told the Sunday Times (£) that focusing too closely on a specific subject to the exclusion of others is the fast route to dull lawyers who are lacking in creativity.

“Specialisation cramps imagination and limits curiosity,” the silk — who took a seat at the highest bench in the land at the beginning of 2012 — told the newspaper in a lengthy interview, continuing:

I think it’s particularly important to escape [specialisation] if you’re a lawyer, because history is a huge fund of vicarious experience, and what lawyers and judges need above all is experience. Unfortunately, they live only one life, and therefore they are dependent on living some other lives as well. History is a very good way of doing that.

Sumption’s remarks yesterday are part of a theme for the judge. Six months after being appointed to the Supreme Court, he told Counsel Magazine in no uncertain terms that wannabe lawyers should avoid law degrees, as they were tantamount to diseases carried by flea-ridden black rats.

“It is best not to read law as an undergraduate,” the old Etonian, who went on to read history at Oxford, told the barristers’ monthly at the time, adding:

The problem is that we have a generation of lawyers, and this applies to solicitors as well as barristers, who are coming into the profession with much less in the way of general culture than their predecessors. It is very unfortunate, for example, that many of them cannot speak or read a single language other than their own.

Sumption was called at Inner Temple in 1975 and was made up to silk 11 years later at the age of only 38.

As a practising silk, Sumption is probably best known in the public’s eye for his successful defence of Chelsea Football Club owner Roman Abramovich, when the Russian billionaire was sued by his oligarch compatriot Boris Berezovsky.

The post Modern lawyers are far too specialised, says Supreme Court judge appeared first on Legal Cheek.


Diva of Divorce up against most-followed lawyer on Instagram in battle for ‘Legal Personality of the Year’ crown

$
0
0

It’s solicitor v barrister in fight for coveted Law Society gong

Lead

It will be bling with lashings of glitz at this year’s Law Society excellence awards as the solicitors’ body has shortlisted two of the legal profession’s flashiest self-promoters for gongs.

Divorce law queen Ayesha Vardag will go head to head with Doughty Street Chambers pin-up barrister Tunde Okewale for the title of “personality of the year”.

Vardag is renowned for her high-profile client list, her views on pre-nuptial agreements and her own blinging wedding of a year ago.

The so-called Diva of Divorce made legal profession headlines when she acted in the Supreme Court case of Radmacher, which arguably gave pre-nups a boost in English law.

She then made society column headlines with her pre-wedding website for her marriage in June 2014. It highlighted a “Harry Winston peridot and diamond affair” engagement ring and read like a feature from the Tatler.

Okewale is likewise no stranger to media coverage. He is well known as the most followed barrister on Instagram and was placed at number 33 in last year’s list of the 35 coolest Britons published by style bible GQ magazine.

But Okewale is also no stranger to a spot of controversy, having found himself a couple of months ago in the middle of a social media row with non-practising barrister and media talking-head Sophia Cannon.

Adding to the glamour of the evening is top line sponsorship from the motorcar of choice of legal aid lawyers around the country, Maserati.

But while Vardag and Okewale seem to have personality to spare, the rest of the award short-list nosedives on the entertainment front.

For some reason, the award organisers have nominated two crime specialist solicitors — Bill Waddington and Robin Murray — together as a single entry, as though there were connected at the hip (they are not).

Also on the list is Joss Saunders, the general counsel at charity Oxfam, Zoe Norden, a junior in-house lawyer at The Guardian newspaper, Rebecca Stevens, another family law specialist solicitor (so keep ‘em peeled for a potential cat-fight with Vardag on the night), and Michael Ward, the senior partner at law firm Gateley. Presumably his winning personality was the driving factor in that practice’s recent stock market flotation.

The joy and the tears will all take place on 22 October at the Hilton Hotel in London’s exclusive Park Lane.

The post Diva of Divorce up against most-followed lawyer on Instagram in battle for ‘Legal Personality of the Year’ crown appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Wannabe solicitor loses £800k claim for missing out on training contract because of car crash

$
0
0

Judge doesn’t buy line that law firm’s alleged negligence caused loss of professional opportunity — but praises litigant-in-person’s legal skills

Lead

A litigant-in-person has lost her bid to blame a car crash for failing to bag a training contract.

Susan Berney has had a terrible time of it, with her crash — in which she suffered “moderately severe whiplash” — being followed by more bad luck in the form of allegedly negligent legal representation in her resultant attempt to secure compensation. This, she argued, left her with only a tiny fraction of the damages she deserved.

Manchester-based Thomas Saul & Co issued the accident claim on behalf of Berney back in 2005, but, according to Legal Futures, the firm allegedly failed to file the particulars “in time or at all”. Berney still got a payout of £25,000, but she reckoned that without the mistake she would have got much more — and wanted £800,000 in damages for, amongst other things, the lost opportunity of becoming a hot shot solicitor.

Berney set about achieving this by issuing a claim against Thomas Saul & Co in 2011 that saw her argue successfully before the Court of Appeal that she wasn’t bound by a limitation issue.

But, in the latest instalment of the case, reported by Lawtel, High Court Judge Karen Walden-Smith threw the claim out, while praising the wannabe lawyer’s preparation and advocacy. The judge was sympathetic, but not to the tune of 800,000 nicker.

“Her qualities as a lawyer were demonstrated before me, and before the Court of Appeal in the earlier appeal against the strike-out,” the judge ruled, according to the website, continuing:

However, that does not mean that it is the RTA [road traffic accident] that has caused her not to become a solicitor and I find no connection between the RTA and her inability to find employment as a solicitor.

Judge Walden-Smith continued:

If I am wrong about that and she would have otherwise have obtained a contract, such a contract would not have been with a City firm (Ms Berney accepted that was an unrealistic goal) and it would have been in a small firm, undertaking publicly-funded work.

The judge added that it was “most significant” that Ms Berney had applied unsuccessfully for training contracts before the accident. And, far from 800 grand, she reckoned that Berney was more likely to bag damages of between £10,000 and £25,000.

Still, she praised Berney for the “calm and logical manner in which she presented her case”. So maybe that legal dream isn’t over yet.

The post Wannabe solicitor loses £800k claim for missing out on training contract because of car crash appeared first on Legal Cheek.

RPC unveils autumn retention figure of 79%

$
0
0

City of London firm will keep 15 of 19 UK trainees

Lead

RPC has announced today that 15 of its 19-strong trainee cohort will remain at the firm after they qualify this autumn, equating to a 79% retention rate.

That represents a drop on last year’s figure, when the Tower Bridge-based practice recorded a perfect 100% result.

The firm — which offers around 20 training contracts annually — confirmed to Legal Cheek that 13 of its junior lawyers will remain at its London office. The remaining two will begin life as associates at RPC’s Bristol outpost.

The firm also revealed today that two trainees — who are scheduled to qualify this September at RPC’s Hong Kong office — will also be remaining.

RPC managing partner Jonathan Watmough said:

It is great to see that, even though we maintain rigidly high standards when it comes to both recruiting for our trainee programme and the criteria we set for qualification, we continue to retain such a high percentage of newly qualified lawyers across our offices.

Today’s retention news follows what has been been a period of mixed results for City law firms.

Yesterday, shipping specialist Ince & Co dropped to bottom of the retention table, revealing rather sheepishly, that 40% of its trainees were heading for the exit. While over the past month, Taylor Wessing, Mills & Reeve and what is arguably the most elite firm in the City, Slaughter and May, all posted encouraging results.

However, the Square Mile offices of several prominent US firms — including Sullivan & Cromwell — are leading the way, posting prefect 100% retention results. However, the US practices traditionally have much smaller graduate intakes.

The post RPC unveils autumn retention figure of 79% appeared first on Legal Cheek.

What corporate lawyers say Vs what corporate lawyers mean

$
0
0

The euphemisms that keep the deals moving

They don’t necessarily mean what they say in the partnership boardrooms in the Square Mile — as a bunch of City lawyers have been noting on a highly amusing “work euphemisms” thread that has been doing the rounds online this month.

We’ve celebrated our 14 favourites through the medium of corporate stock images…

‘In a meeting’

1

‘Quite challenging’

2

‘One or two issues’

3

‘I welcome any advice’

4

‘Of course we agreed compound interest’

5

‘I look forward to hearing from you’

businessman using a laptop in an office

The promotion to ‘legal director’

7

‘Apologies for the urgency’

‘I am on speaker phone’

9

‘Where would the firm be without her?’

10

Retirement best wishes

11

‘Thanks for the helpful comments’

12

‘The life and soul of the Christmas party’

13

‘A commercial solution’

14

Hat tip to the RollOnFriday messageboard — the full thread is here.

The post What corporate lawyers say Vs what corporate lawyers mean appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Superhero update: The Caped Crusader has become a Texas lawyer

$
0
0

Corpus Christi-based personal injury specialist is the real deal — just check the surname

Lead

US law firm advertising hoardings provide an almost endless supply of legal profession comedy — so it’s off to Corpus Christi in Texas for the latest instalment.

This one is for all those who never really bought Michael Keaton, Val Kilmer, George Clooney (aka, Mr Amal Alamuddin) or Christian Bale in the role of the Caped Crusader.

Legal Cheek gives you Christopher Batman, a former member of the US navy’s judge advocate general corps and now a lawyer specialising in maritime personal injury work. Indeed, pride of place on the firm’s website home page is a shot of the Bat Boat yacht.

boat

Still no sign of Robin, but perhaps a paralegal role beckons…

The post Superhero update: The Caped Crusader has become a Texas lawyer appeared first on Legal Cheek.

You can have rubbish A-levels and still succeed in legal profession

$
0
0

Legal Cheek Twitter hash tag generates rush of proud responses from those who pissed about at school but still became lawyers

Text

Newbie law students may be cracking the cider bottles to celebrate their exam results, but do A-levels really mean that much in the modern legal profession recruitment game?

Graduate recruitment specialists tell Legal Cheek that even the top law firms are increasingly moving away from a forensic distillation of A-level results. They are far more interested in breaking down specific law degree module performance.

Indeed, university results are what matters — at least on the solicitor side of the profession. Top-flight Square Mile recruitment specialists indicate that a first-class degree from even a mediocre university will trump a “Desmond” (or for those born in the 1990s, a 2.2) from Oxbridge and an upper second from a Russell Group law faculty.

While that approach is not as prevalent at chambers — most pupillage committees still cast an eye over A-level results — it is gradually seeping into bar recruitment policies as well.

And as Legal Cheek’s Twitter hashtag (#LawyersWithRubbishAlevels) today showed, even lawyers from past generations have managed to overcome “rubbish” A-level results and achieve success in the legal profession.

Top marks (as it were) went to Stefan Cross QC. The solicitor silk informed us that he bagged an A-level “Auntie” (er … that’s BBC).

Another well known criminal law specialist — barrister turned solicitor-advocate Nicholas Diable — put his hands up to kipping through A-levels, ending up with a BED.

And bollicks A-levels also don’t seem to be an automatic block to nailing down a judicial appointment, as @BrummyBar points out.

Here’s a selection of other lawyers who battled into the profession despite spending a fair bit of time puffing on the fags round the bike sheds.

The post You can have rubbish A-levels and still succeed in legal profession appeared first on Legal Cheek.

The 6 most ridiculous legal stories of the silly season so far

$
0
0

Someone qualifies as a lawyer; a law student is fined for speeding; a legal team wins a claim; an Italian lawyer nicks a wallet; a Japanese lawyer loses his penis, and a beauty queen fakes whiplash — our round-up of summer frippery so far

meme

If it’s the second week of August, it must be the silly season.

That means media outlets across the land — from Fleet Street giants to regional minnows — are desperately searching for anything vaguely resembling a news story at a time when politicians and business leaders have all buggered off to the seaside.

Legal affairs coverage is no exception, and to save readers from having to scour the Internet, Legal Cheek has picked up these silly season gems involving the law and lawyers.

FORMER BOOTS MANAGER QUALIFIES AS A SOLICITOR

story1

We kick off with some monumental news straight out of Cumbria. It’s not all skinny dipping shockers in the lakes round the newsroom of website Cumbria Crack (that’s what it’s called) come August.

Two days ago the news team revealed that Joanne Grey — a former manager of a well-known chain of dispensing chemists — had only gone and qualified as a solicitor.

Grey did a 14-year stint with Boots in Penrith before deciding she would rather dole out divorce advice than Viagra. She’s now with the family law team at the Carlisle office of high street general practice Burnetts.

MAIDSTONE LAW STUDENT AND FORMER THANET COUNCIL CANDIDATE, PAYAM TAMIZ, CONVICTED OF SPEEDING

story

At the other end of the country in the so-called Garden of England, the August news wasn’t so cheery.

Kent Online — the website of the Kent Messenger newspaper — reported on the devastating development that a law student had been convicted of … speeding.

Payam Tamiz, who is also a former Thanet council candidate, was done for belting along at 64mph in a 50mph zone. The bench at Sevenoaks Magistrates’ Court slapped Tamiz — who did an LLB at Kent University before heading to the University of Westminster for the Legal Practice Course in 2010 — with a rather stiff penalty of 700 nicker.

PRO BONO BIRMINGHAM LAWYER WINS LORRY DRIVER’S LICENCE BACK

post

Back up to the midlands for better news. Agata Dmoch — an associate at the Birmingham office of Mills & Reeve — is being hailed by the local media for getting a lorry driver back on the road.

According to the Birmingham Post, trucker Marek Durkiewicz — who suffers from a medical condition that requires regular re-certification of his licence — was caught in a Euro-red tape nightmare that threatened to prevent him from driving across the continent.

The minutia of this story is complex, but suffice it to say that Polish speaker Dmoch teamed with a barrister from local No5 Chambers in a pro bono deal that ensured Durkiewicz can truck away happily for the foreseeable future.

ITALIAN LAWYER STEALS FRENCH TOURIST’S WALLET

Lawyer

Our next silly season tale involves two nationalities the British love to stereotype.

According to The Local — an online English language news service that brings titbits from across the continent — an unnamed Italian lawyer nicked the wallet of an unnamed French tourist somewhere in Sardinia.

The website quoted local Italian website Blitzquotidiano as claiming that this daredevil and vile crime took place at a supermarket checkout counter.

The Italian thief — who is clearly a discredit to the nation’s entire legal profession if this account is accurate — allegedly slipped the unsuspecting Gallic tourist’s dosh and cards into his own shopping bag, which, we are reliably informed, typically contained a packet of pasta.

The whole heist was caught on CCTV and the lawyer had his collar felt later that evening as he drank in a local bar.

MAN CUTS OFF LAWYER’S PENIS; FLUSHES IT DOWN TOILET

Penis

From even farther afield came this painful story of a crime de passion.

A graduate student burst into a Tokyo lawyer’s office recently and proceeded to lop off his penis with a pair of garden shears.

According to an AFP report published on website Japan Today, local rozzers speculated that the student and the lawyer were love rivals — it appears the former’s wife had fallen for the bedroom advocacy skills of the latter.

To drive home just how irritated he was with the lawyers’ philandering, the student is alleged to have flushed his severed member down the bog for good measure.

MODEL JAILED FOR FALSE WHIPLASH CLAIM

Large

Even the specialist legal press can fall victim to silly season stories — provided a pretty face is involved.

The Law Gazette went to town yesterday on the tale of a model and former women’s league footballer who was handed a two-month jail sentence for faking a road traffic personal injury claim, which in the insurance world is not an uncommon occurrence.

But this story involved Amy Laban, a part-time model, who had also had run-outs for Nottingham Forest and Birmingham City ladies. Laban and a chum claimed £3,000 following a traffic incident.

However, the 25-year-old failed to turn up for medical appointments and was finally revealed to have been involved in a tough pre-beauty pageant exercise regime and a skydive when she was meant to be laid up with whiplash.

The post The 6 most ridiculous legal stories of the silly season so far appeared first on Legal Cheek.


Sullivan & Cromwell shoots to top of UK pay league with record £101,500 newly-qualified solicitor salary

$
0
0

Exclusive: London office of New York firm is now highest paying in City — with closest English firm languishing £23,000 behind

Lead

White shoe stalwart Sullivan & Cromwell has become the first law firm in London to pay its newly qualified (NQ) lawyers more than £100,000, Legal Cheek can reveal exclusively.

The New York-based firm has chucked its freshly minted lawyers a pay rise worth more than 4%, taking the starting wedge from £97,500 to £101,500. Trainee salaries remain at £50,000 for new starters and £55,000 for second years.

That increase blasts the firm past competitor compatriots in London — Skadden, Latham & Watkins, Davis Polk and Akin Gump — to the top of the NQ pay league table. The move, while a welcome sign of health for corporate law, will rekindle fears among English firms that their US counterparts are stoking junior lawyer wage inflation.

According to the Legal Cheek Most List, bottom tier junior lawyers at Akin Gump and Davis Polk are on £100,000, while those at Latham & Watkins and Skadden trail on £98,000.

The English firm that comes closest to paying its NQs that Yankee-style gold is magic circle player Allen & Overy. The City firm awarded new associates a whopping pay rise worth slightly more than 18% back in June.

Nonetheless, that took the firm’s NQs to an annual salary of just £78,500 — or £23,000 less than rookies at Sullivan & Cromwell will be wheel-barrowing home.

S&C’s most recent revenue figures showed it turning over nearly $1.28 billion (£820 million). On average, the firm’s full equity partners each trousered annual drawings of nearly $3.7m (about £2.4m).

Meanwhile, in other junior lawyer pay news, fellow New Yorkers Weil Gotshal bumped up its London NQ pay by £1,500 to £97,000. That more miserly 2% pay rise pulled the firm level in the UK capital with Chicago-founded Kirkland & Ellis.

Sullivan & Cromwell declined to issue a comment.

The post Sullivan & Cromwell shoots to top of UK pay league with record £101,500 newly-qualified solicitor salary appeared first on Legal Cheek.

The Judge Rules: Anything less than a 100% qualifying lawyer retention is a law firm fail

$
0
0

Training contracts provide large global practices with a recruitment safety net — but that’s not good for their businesses

Newly-qualified solicitor retention rates are really the preserve of legal profession anoraks.

And as Legal Cheek has a full collection of the finest law train-spotters known to mankind, this website has been dutifully covering every announcement to seep from Square Mile and other corporate law firm personnel departments.

Of course, the obvious problem with retention rate figures is that the headline percentages are subject to disproportionate fluctuations owing to the relatively small cohorts of qualifying lawyers involved.

Even the most of muscular magic circle firms will not produce a qualifying pool of more than, say, 50, which means that retaining or jettisoning four or five here and there will significantly affect the top-line percentage.

Now the Judge is certainly no statistician — he generally ducked out of maths classes in favour of working out how many boys could sit round the elaborate ice-chilled bong one of the lads had fashioned from a water-cooler bottle.

However, common sense suggests that any cohort short of 50 is not going to supply very meaningful data regarding percentage shifts. So when some of the offices of the US firms in London record high retention rates, they do so against the backdrop of having as few as 15 — or even fewer — qualifying lawyers at their practices.

But the real issue about retention rates is this: should any firm be happy with anything less than 100%? Or put another way: Should anything less than 100% be deemed a management failure?

What other business — apart from multi-national corporate law — spends a fortune recruiting talent in the knowledge that it is not doing so for the long term? Banks and others in the financial sector and large corporations generally do not recruit with the caveat that in two years’ time as many as 30% or even 40% of those newbies will be walking out the door.

Those businesses are likely to put recruits on a six-month probation period, but the starting proposition is that everyone hired is there for the long term; if 40%, 30% or even 20% or 10% were gone after two years, serious questions would be asked of recruitment managers.

Law firm NQ retention rates highlight again the bizarre role of the training contract in the legal profession structure. It creates an extended probation period that arguably encourages laziness in graduate recruitment departments.

That laziness — which potentially allows law firms to take a punt on some candidates without being fully convinced of their suitability — will be good news for some wannabe lawyers: sneak under the wire and have a pop at proving yourself.

But it seems like poor business practice. For example, when Wall Street law firms recruit fresh blood in their home jurisdiction they must do so without the safety net of a training contract that allows them to bin those that did not work out two years down the road. Sure, they can get rid of people — but they have to fire them properly, with all the hassle and soul searching that should involve.

City law firms spend a lot of money and management time on their trainees. They not only pick up the tab for their vocational training fees, but they also lay on grants and then, of course, reasonable salaries when the greenhorns start their contracts.

Should the undoubtedly well-paid human resources executives at those firms be patting their own backs when they hit a retention rate of 80% or 85%. Shouldn’t every newly-qualified lawyer that they don’t retain be considered a mark of failure for those “talent” experts?


The post The Judge Rules: Anything less than a 100% qualifying lawyer retention is a law firm fail appeared first on Legal Cheek.

The 25 sexiest solicitors in the City

$
0
0

Meet London’s hottest corporate lawyers

Lead

Rich, highly-intelligent and savvy about the workings of the world: what’s not to like about City solicitors?

Many also look rather nice as well. Having been kindly invited by Legal Cheek to share with you our favourite corporate law hotties, we, The Sexy Solicitor Specialists, bring you the most desirable solicitors in London…

1. Neel Sachdev, Kirkland & Ellis

neel-sachdev

With his pin-up looks and flamboyant dress sense, Neel Sachdev looks more like a movie star than a lawyer.

But beneath that luscious brown hair is the brain of a legal super nerd. In hot demand among the world’s top private equity houses, Sachdev, 39, spends his days (and nights and weekends) advising on leveraged buyouts and other complex financing transactions taking place across the globe.

In his rare moments of off-time, the Kirkland & Ellis hotshot — who became one of the firm’s youngest ever partners in 2007 — can be found at fave haunt Shoreditch House, or chilling in his Haggerston Riviera penthouse.

2. Monica Burch, Addleshaw Goddard

Monica-burch

There are few more powerful women in the legal profession than Addleshaw Goodard senior partner Monica Burch — one of only a handful of female lawyers at the helm of City of London law firms. And The Sexy Solicitor Specialists just love powerful women!

A champion of flexible working, Burch refuses to follow the City legal profession convention of working crazy hours and admits that she “can’t work without sleep”. The Oxford-educated commercial litigator’s mission is now to help the next generation of female lawyers reach the top in greater numbers than her peers.

Burch says that her biggest regret was not working flexibly until she had her third child. Now, as chairwoman of The Mentoring Foundation — a not-for-profit that runs programmes for future women leaders — this sexy solicitor is striving to change corporate culture for the better.

3. Oliver Hunt, Onside Law

oliverhunt

Knowing us The Sexy Solicitor Specialists, knowing you Oliver Hunt, “arguably the leading golf lawyer in Europe”, ah ha!

OK, so his firm profile blurb may be a little Partridge-esque, but try to look beyond that to the incredible blond quiff sported by the sports solicitor, not to mention the faraway look in his eyes — which hints at a breadth of interests that may extend to cricket and even Formula One.

Not convinced? Well, consider Hunt’s background as a corporate lawyer at Nabarro, and the entrepreneurial zeal he showed to set up Onside Law back in 2005 with two City law pals. Certainly, what the “Shrewsbury”-educated (Shrewsbury Technical College?) chap lacks in renaissance man credentials, he makes up for in connections.

4. Sally Wokes, Slaughter and May

sallywokes

Blueblood magic circle outfit Slaughter and May is considered the hardest firm in the City in which to become a partner. But for the tiny percentage who make it the rewards are mind-blowing — S&M top dogs pull in as much as £2 million per year.

Imagine being anointed into this select group aged just 33 having already won the life lottery for looks and intelligence? Welcome to the world of Sally Wokes, Slaughter and May’s latest golden child.

The UCL graduate is an expert in international corporate deals, jetting around the world to advise on multi-billion pound transactions from the firm’s base in Bunhill Row in Moorgate. Not bad for someone who only qualified as a solicitor eight years ago.

5. Matt Holder, CMS Cameron McKenna

Matt-holder

Sometimes in life you just need a bit of totty. And CMS Cameron McKenna trainee solicitor Matt Holder is exactly that. Having previously worked at Abercrombie & Fitch — whose legally problematic penchant for hiring the good-looking is well documented — you can be sure that the Lancaster University graduate has the body to match his beautiful face.

What else of Holder? Well, it’s still early days in this lad’s career, but he likes rugby, skiing and going to the gym. And he’s a Scorpio. Plus, being from Bolton, he has a charming northern accent.

6. Robert Bishop, DLA Piper

BobBishop

A girl would feel safe with Robert Bishop on her arm. The head of DLA Piper’s international corporate group exudes a calm, policeman-like authority; his chiselled jaw a symbol of strength and steadfastness in the often cut-throat world of M&A.

But Bishop is no one dimensional superhero figure. Formative years spent at the International School of Brussels have ensured that this sturdy dealmaker is highly sophisticated, as much at home munching on a pain au chocolat as he is crunching through the due diligence on the latest big-money corporate acquisition.

7. Selina Sagayam, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher

selina

Corporate finance specialist Selina Sagayam has comfortably navigated the well-worn pathways of the global elite to reach the top of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher’s City of London office. On the way she has passed through educational establishments as fine as Raffles School in Singapore and St Paul’s Girl’s School in London, before slumming it at King’s College.

But her spell at “Strand Poly” didn’t dent Sagayam’s prospects as she began her career as a barrister, before going into banking and then qualifying as a solicitor. She looks barely a day over 30, but don’t be deceived: Sagayam is an experienced operator, having made partner back in 2004 at her first firm, Simmons & Simmons. 11 years on and she is one of the most respected dealmakers in the City.

8. Louis Dewfall, TLT

SG

So busy has lovely Louis Dewfall been studying law at Bristol University, and then doing his Legal Practice Course and training contract, that he is blissfully unaware that the Hoxton Fin went out of fashion many years ago.

It is, of course, this very innocence that brings Dewfall his charm. Like a good-natured shepherd boy who through some mix-up finds himself in London, the TLT banking & finance associate is so determined to do the best for his new paymasters that new hairstyles can wait!

One day, a few years from now, when Dewfall is a partner and the Hoxton Fin is all the rage again, this lad will be an incredible catch. Hook him while you can.

9. Fiona Woolf, CMS Cameron McKenna

fionaw

There’s a legendary show biz story about how Hollywood hearthrob Colin Farrell — then 28 — spent two hours begging veteran actor Dame Eileen Atkins for sex. Atkins apparently turned Farrell down because he is 42 years her junior.

We imagine much the same interaction happens each day at CMS Cameron McKenna, where the firm’s stunning partner Dame Fiona Woolf, 67, sets trainees’ pulses racing.

Woolf, who is one of the top energy lawyers in the world, has been widely feted for her legal skills and — following her stint as Lord Mayor of London — public service, but in The Sexy Solicitor Specialists‘ opinion not enough column inches have been devoted to her Bond Girl looks.

10. Michael Sergeant, Holman Fenwick Willan

ms-h

Gerard Butler, is that you? Holman Fenwick Willan’s London construction partner Michael Sergeant is a dead ringer for the Hollywood star (who legal geeks will of course know is a trained solicitor himself). But enough about Gerard and more about Michael…

Educated at Manchester University in the late 80s, The Sexy Solicitor Specialists imagine a long-haired, indy-loving Sergeant hanging out with The Stone Roses before they found fame, while harbouring a barely-contained longing for the world of construction law.

“One day I’ll pen a book on construction contracts,” he probably told a young Ian Brown, as the latter worked on the lyrics for ‘I wanna be adored’. And sure enough, last year out popped the Sergeant-authored tome Construction Contract Variation, which has already been described as an “an indispensable classic” by the Law Society Gazette.

11. Mariana Lavanchy, White & Case

WC1

Schooled in Geneva before heading to London’s King’s College for uni, multi-lingual Mariana Lavanchy is every inch the glamorous international lawyer. To date, the career of the newly-qualified associate at the City office of New York giant White & Case has included six-month stints in Singapore and Paris. Prior to that she did not just one but two masters — at the College of Europe in Brussells and at La Sorbonne in Paris.

But Mariana is by no means just about global glitz. No, the commercial litigation and international arbitration specialist is also hot on her pro bono work, advising in her spare time at Whitechapel Homeless Mission’s legal advice clinic and at the Citizens Advice Bureau.

12. Oliver Lyons, Mayer Brown

olm

With designer stubble that tantalisingly threatens to extend to a full hipster beard, Oliver Lyons is equally at home in the sandwich shops of either Liverpool Street or Shoreditch High Street during his fleeting lunch breaks at global megafirm Mayer Brown.

And what stubble it is! With the bristles perfectly encasing Lyons’ cherub-like lips, above which sits that perfectly symmetrical nose, bordered by those cheeky eyes…

Lyons’ evidently deeply poetic soul was developed at Warwick University, where he studied English and American Literature. A law conversion course followed before he landed his City gig in 2012, but the whispers of Ginsberg, Hemingway and Falconer continue to flicker in that far-off stare.

13. David Carter, Ashurst

OLYMPUS

The flowery tie and checked shirt in his firm profile photo was a step too far, but Ashurst hunk David Carter makes it into the list because of a willingness to challenge the norm that we find very sexy.

Equally at home in Mayfair’s Le Gavroche (his second favourite restaurant, according to The Lawyer magazine) as Nando’s (his first favourite restaurant), Carter is a breath of fresh air in the often rather snobby and conformist world of corporate law.

Bravely, he has been publicly critical of the legal profession’s fetish for doing crazy hours, describing working all-nighters as “an unhealthy and profoundly foolish practice” when asked by the legal press how long he had worked without sleep.

Yet the Warwick University-educated private equity specialist is no renegade, charming colleagues with his collaborative style and commitment to teamwork. A lengthy spell as the firm’s graduate recruitment partner underlines his commitment to helping create a more civilised next generation of corporate lawyers.

14. Melis Acuner, Skadden

melis

Melis Acuner may work for one of the toughest, deal-driven law firms in the world — insiders report that Skadden radiates with a determination to do whatever it takes for the client — but that hasn’t prevented her from defining herself as a mother as well as a solicitor.

While her touching Twitter profile pic (above) gives us an insight into Acuner the person, Acuner the lawyer is every bit as high-achieving as you would expect of someone pushing on the door of partnership at mighty Skadden. She speaks English, French, Turkish and Spanish, is a qualified lawyer in Paris as well as London and jets all over the world in her role as an international arbitration specialist.

15. Samantha Critchley, Fieldfisher

samantha-critchley

While Samantha Critchley’s corporate lawyer peers help facilitate the generation of bucket loads of cash for banks and hedge funds, she concentrates on helping people — albeit from the lofty platform of City firm Fieldfisher‘s clinical negligence department.

A specialist in representing claimants, Bristol University-educated Critchley acts in all sorts of heart-rendering cases, where doctors have unfortunately botched their jobs.

What’s more, the gorgeous brunette is big on pro bono, using her free time to help out yet more needy people — in 2009, she won the Legal Advice Clinic’s Supervisor of the Year Award. To relax, this Wonder Woman enjoys abseiling and parachuting.

16. Robert Boughey, K&L Gates

Boughey Robert

K&L Gates insiders tell The Sexy Solicitor Specialists that Boughey has been quite the talk of the firm since arriving as a trainee in 2011.

An Oxford University history graduate, Boughey did what all Oxford history graduates do when they realise how much historians get paid and enrolled on the Graduate Diploma in Law. A training contract with the London office of Pittsburgh-based K&L ensued and — Boff! Or, should that be Bowf? — out came the spotty-tie-stripy-shirt combos.

In short, Robert is well boughable.

17. Jenny Davidson, Allen & Overy

jenny.davidson

Jenny Davidson is the sort of alpha girl-next-door type that struggling beta males dream of somehow being scooped up by — and living out their days under their wonderfully talented wings.

With her comfortingly ordinary name and understated beauty, Davidson has a veneer just unthreatening enough to avoid unsettling delicate male egos, but lurking beneath is a global elite performer.

Educated in Holland and France, Davidson has a commitment to law so deep that during her days at the University of Utrecht she worked part-time as a paralegal at Clifford Chance. A brief spell at the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs followed upon graduation, before she joined magic circle firm Allen & Overy‘s London office eight years ago. Next stop, partner.

18. Simon Goldring, Berwin Leighton Paisner

goldring

If you like it, “put a ring on it,” sung Beyoncé memorably. Even better, put a gold ring on it. With Simon Goldring’s plentiful salary in the private client disputes team of Berwin Leighton Paisner, that level of precious metal may be a distinct possibility for successful suitors of this fellow.

Alternatively, use gorgeous Goldring as a springboard to access his clients — many of whom are based “offshore” and have real money. But unlike Manchester University-educated Simon, who seems such a nice boy, these Oligarch-types might not be marriage material.

19. Caroline Edwards, Travers Smith

caroline-edwards

Caroline Edwards is one of only a handful of women included in the partnership of elite corporate law boutique Travers Smith — 86% of whose senior bods are men.

The South African litigator — who trained at another male dominated firm, Slaughter and May — has the ever-so-slightly-disappointed air of an aristocrat who has somehow found herself at a frat boy sausage party but remains determined to make the best of it.

Doubtless it is this classiness that has seen Rhodes University-educated Edwards instructed on some of the biggest cases of the last decade, including the administration of Lehman Brothers. She is described by the Legal 500 legal directory as somebody who “knows when to be pragmatic and flexible, and when to fight”.

20. Phillippa Canavan, Squire Patton Boggs

canavanphillippa

Since graduating with a law degree from the University of Exeter in 2003, Phillippa Canavan has hauled herself to within reach of partnership at one of the most geographically sprawling law firms in the world, Squire Patton Boggs.

That would be no mean feat for a lawyer who worked non-stop. But Canavan, who specialises in employment law, has somehow managed to combine her ascent at SPB with charity cycles in Vietnam, volunteer work at Paddington Law Centre and legal blogging. Meanwhile, she has used the firm’s international network to enjoy stints in Turin and Jersey as she lives the corporate law dream to the fullest.

21. James Fryer, Pinsent Masons

James-fryer

Like Tom Cruise’s character, Brian Flanagan, in hit 80s film Cocktail, James Fryer worked as a barman to pay his way through university, doubtless impressing adoring clientele with his formidable skills and breathtaking looks.

But this is where the paths of fictional Brian and real James diverge. While Flanaghan finished up ditching his Wall Street dream and starting his own bar in Jamaica, SOAS and University of Law-educated Fryer never lost sight of his original goal and eventually secured a training contract at Pinsent Masons.

With such determination, we’re sure he’ll do well in the unforgiving world of City law, and soon rise above all those rich kids who drift into becoming solicitors through family connections. What’s more, Fryer speaks Mandarin, having studied the language at undergraduate level.

22. Boin Cheong, Latham & Watkins

boin

A fluent speaker of Korean, German and English, who has degrees from the universities of Cambridge and Columbia in New York, Boin Cheong has a CV to die for.

Better still, unlike many a geeky university high-achiever, Cheong is really good at functioning in the real world! Having bagged a host of top internships at the likes of Boston Consulting Group and McKinsey & Company, she netted a training contract at international giant Mayer Brown before switching upon qualification to the London office of elite US firm Latham & Watkins last year.

In her new home, Cheong pulls in £98,000 a year, one of the highest newly qualified solicitor salaries in the capital.

23. Tim Taylor QC, King & Wood Mallesons

taylor_t

The dad of Made in Chelsea star Hugo Taylor, Tim Taylor, has, like his son, quite a taste for the limelight. Working Hugo’s connections, the Paul Hollywood look-a-like appeared in a cameo role in the first series of the hit trustafarian reality show, wowing viewers with a glimpse into his lifestyle jetting between London and top Middle Eastern arbitration courts.

He has since followed this with a starring role in a slapstick comedy video that he made with some junior lawyers at King & Wood Mallesons in which they clowned around a pool in Dubai.

But beneath the playful exterior is a tough cookie who has worked himself up to the QC rank — usually reserved for barristers — as a solicitor, which is viewed as quite an achievement within the profession. Having grafted so hard to enable his son to enjoy the life of a playboy, few would surely begrudge Taylor senior a little extra-curricular glitz.

24. Joseph Altendorff, Dentons

AltendorffJoseph

This senior associate in Dentons‘ corporate department has quite the hypnotising gaze. Seriously — we can’t look away. It’s like some Jedi mind trick. Perhaps that’s how Altendorff has managed to wangle so many sought after secondments during his relatively short career.

First there was the short-term gig he managed to bag at Goldman Sachs in 2008. Then somehow the Durham graduate secured jollies in Dentons’ offices in Istanbul and Dubai, before in 2011 heading back to Blighty.

Where will those come-to-bed-eyes take Altendorff next?

25. Charlotte Harris, Kingsley Napley

charlotteharris

Media law specialist Charlotte Harris is one of the few City lawyers to have reached near-celeb status — in part thanks to her phone-hacking claims work, which she spearheaded while she was a lowly solicitor at a regional firm in Manchester.

Her career has since soared, with a move to London with Mishcon de Reya being followed last year with a switch to leading City shop Kingsley Napley, where she is a partner. Her clients include a host of footballers and MPs.

Still aged just 37, Harris already has three kids, a financier husband and a posh gaffe in Hampstead. Yet we have the sense that this sexy solicitor — who has a well-known penchant for leather miniskirts — is just getting started.

The post The 25 sexiest solicitors in the City appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Freshfields posts 83% newly qualified lawyer retention rate

$
0
0

Anglo-German magic circle giant makes 43 offers — and is snubbed by three new lawyers

fresh

Global City law firm Freshields Bruckhaus Deringer announced at the end of last week that 40 of a 48-strong trainee cohort will remain at the firm after they qualify as solicitors next month, equating to a retention rate of 83%.

The magic circle player revealed that it made offers to 43 of its trainee lawyers, with three daring to reject the elite outfit.

The 83% figure is a marginal drop on its spring performance, when the firm retained 85% of its trainee intake.

Freshfields is only the second magic circle firm to announce an autumn retention figure, with Slaughter and May revealing last month that it was retaining 89% of its young legal talent.

The new Freshfield lawyers shouldn’t expect a bumper pay packet post-qualification. Earlier this year the firm announced that NQ salaries would remain unchanged at £67,500 leaving junior lawyers at the firm languishing at the bottom of the magic circle pay table.

Previously:

The Judge Rules: Anything less than a 100% qualifying lawyer retention is a law firm fail [Legal Cheek]

The post Freshfields posts 83% newly qualified lawyer retention rate appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Tribunal slaps young solicitor, 30, for faking orthopaedic expert reports

$
0
0

Junior is hit with an indefinite suspension — and a gets £10,000 costs order into the bargain

lead

From the wind swept lakes of Cumbria comes a sad tale of a solicitor who was overwhelmed by work and panicked.

The lesson of this story is that lawyers shouldn’t pretend to know things about orthopaedic surgery (unless, of course, they were orthopaedic surgeons in a previous career) — because an indefinite suspension from the disciplinary tribunal is the likely result.

Claire Tunstall was a two-year post-qualification solicitor at the Keswick office of general practice Scott Duff & Co (other outposts in Carlisle and Penrith). She had trained at the firm, but not long after qualification, according to a Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal finding, Tunstall became swamped with work and began to panic.

The upshot was a nightmare of snowballing of cock-ups that the tribunal described as “quite extraordinary”.

Tunstall went on to fabricate a range of documents, including expert witness statements from an orthopaedic surgeon and advice from counsel.

The hapless young solicitor also doled out money from the firm’s office account to a client who was angrily demanding an interim payment in relation to a clinical negligence claim.

The salutary story illustrates the point that you don’t have to be pulling all-nighters in a City glass tower working on global deals to feel the pressure.

The tribunal was sympathetic to a degree. In the finding it stated that it “was persuaded by the respondent’s evidence, which it found to be highly credible, that she had been struggling to cope to the extent that she contemplated having an accident so that she wouldn’t have to go to work anymore”.

The finding continued:

Whilst no medical report was provided, the tribunal entirely accepted the respondent’s evidence on her state of mind at that time and accepted that at the material time the respondent had acted in blind panic under immense pressure, with no thought of the consequences of her actions.

The tribunal also criticised the firm for at times failing to provide Tunstall with adequate supervision.

But that empathy for the young solicitor’s predicament didn’t save her from being hit with an indefinite suspension and a costs order for £10,000.

Read the ruling in full below:

Tunstall

The post Tribunal slaps young solicitor, 30, for faking orthopaedic expert reports appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Law comes to the Edinburgh Fringe

$
0
0

It’s not just arty luvvies galore in the Scottish capital at this time of year…

Lead

If it’s early August, it must be time for the entire British Isles comedy profession to decamp to that lovely northern English city of Edinburgh.

One legal affairs blogger made the long journey to what some still insist is Scotland and reported back with law-related artifacts.

Law firm V Good & Co bags points for quality branding that is bound to strike a cord with anyone who has over-imbibed on the single malt and woken up in the local nick.

However, the firm just as quickly loses most of those points for an over-abundance of gavel imagery on its website.

Scottish law is clearly distinct from that in England and Wales, but unless Nicola Sturgeon has distributed Scots Nats Party-branded gavels to judges while we weren’t looking, Legal Cheek reckons both sides of the border are in harmony on that point.

Where there is divergence is around the nomenclature for the advocacy profession. Scottish advocates get really narked if referred to as barristers. Instead they prefer being called … advocates, which is a bit confusing now that solicitor-advocates have rights of audience in Scotland’s higher courts — but hey, that’s their business. It’s nearly a separate country, after all.

In any event, @legalhackette put the whole issue into context with this image from a far more crucial aspect of Scottish culture — a boozer. The Advocate in Hunter Square in the Old Town encourages its bar staff to wear these little gems, which go down a right treat with tourists from around the world.

And while there is plenty to see and hear during the Fringe, one rarity is a Scottish brogue. Understandably, the locals head for the Munros at this time of year, but not before doing a brisk trade on Airbnb.

But that doesn’t mean that Celtic lilts are absent from Auld Reekie in August — there are plenty of Irish comedian’s plying their craft among the 3,000-plus Fringe acts.

And Legal Cheek readers will be interested in one. Keith Farnan (pictured below) is a former solicitor who took the view that a career being barracked by drunken audiences around the world had more to recommend it than dealing with demanding clients and law firm time sheets.

Lead

Farnan’s Edinburgh gig is called “Anonymous” and it focuses on the highly topical legal issues of privacy, liberty… and comedy.

Every day, more of our personal data is either given away, acquired in the interest of national security, or sold to the highest bidder,” says the blurb to his routine, which runs for the next fortnight. “But maybe we don’t really need our privacy, so let’s start by getting rid of curtains and go from there, shall we?

The post Law comes to the Edinburgh Fringe appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Solicitors’ profession keeps growing like Topsy — up 18% over five years

$
0
0

But with training contracts gradually evaporating and government reforms of legal aid system kicking in, could the party be over?

lawyers

Death, taxes and an ever-increasing solicitors’ profession seem to be three certainties in life.

The biggest legal profession regulator reiterated the last of those realities recently by producing figures that showed that as of last month there were a staggering 133,364 solicitors practising in England and Wales — a more than 2% rise on the previous 12 months.

That means there is one solicitor for every 420 people in the jurisdiction, which is a lower ratio than the number of police per head; that’s only one rozzer to every 448. So if you are being mugged, there’s a better chance of a solicitor rushing to assist than a bobby. Comforting?

Number of practising solicitors from July 2009

graph

All this number crunching comes courtesy of figures from the Solicitors Regulation Authority, the body that imposes a tax on the profession to keep it on the straight and narrow.

The regulators’ figures show that apart from several hiccups over the last five years, the solicitors’ profession has grown by more than 18%.

At the pit of the global financial crisis in December 2009, there were 112,589 practising certificate holders. But despite that cataclysmic economic storm, which hit City and high street practice alike, the profession has more than recovered.

So despite major economic shocks, solicitors just keep multiplying. Although more recently the number of training contracts has been decreasing, perhaps suggesting that while the party might not be exactly over, the cans of cheap supermarket lager in the fridge could be running low and there’s a pissed bloke collapsed on the sofa.

Government policy could also rein in growth. As one anonymous commentator pointed out in relation to the figures on the Law Gazette website:

Er, hate to rain on parades etc. but I suspect the LAA [Legal Aid Agency] crime tender might affect the numbers somewhat.

Indeed, it is widely expected that if the Ministry of Justice gets its way and imposes a two-tier legal aid contract, whole swathes of the criminal law fraternity will be rushing for the door marked “early retirement” as that side of the law firm market contracts.

Indeed, bean counters at the Law Gazette — which is published by the Law Society — must have mixed feelings about increasing numbers. A gift from the society to all newly qualified solicitors is a free subscription to the paper version of the newspaper, meaning that despite the digital age, print costs at the venerable title just keep going north.

Would anyone blame the Gazette’s publisher/commercial director for quietly cheering on the MoJ’s reforms?

The post Solicitors’ profession keeps growing like Topsy — up 18% over five years appeared first on Legal Cheek.


Working class hero leads strike against government legal aid cuts from the tee

$
0
0

Picket line or round of golf? Picket line or round of golf? That’ll be a round of golf, then …

Lead

It ain’t easy being at the forefront of the workers’ struggle. As anyone who has warmed hands over a brazier on a frozen picket line will attest — industrial action is not for the faint hearted.

And here’s Franklin Sinclair tweeting evidence of just how tough it is to battle against the Ministry of Justice’s criminal law legal aid reforms.

Crime specialist lawyers up and down England and Wales have been striking since the beginning of July in a bid to force Justice Secretary Michael Gove to rethink a range of cuts and reforms they maintain will drive many smaller law firms to the wall.

Yesterday Sinclair — the managing partner of one of the country’s largest criminal defence specialist firms, Manchester and London-based Tuckers — tweeted this image of himself making the point about the government’s callous cuts to the members of the Loch Lomond Golf Club.

Pic

Now Scotland might not be in the jurisdiction affected by the MoJ’s plans and it’s not likely that club members will ever require legal aid. Annual Loch Lomond membership fees are reported to run to an eye-watering £55,000, and even a single round is understood to cost 600 nicker.

So what is Sinclair playing at, apart from overpriced golf? Well, for starters, he’s clearly daring the club’s crusty ruling elite to act up over his fashionable modern golf clobber. Not even the late Payne Stewart would have dared to match this pink ensemble.

Of course, Gove was born and raised in Scotland, so perhaps Sinclair’s round was a bid to ingratiate himself into the affections of the Lord Chancellor. After all, every Scotsman is given a pair of plus fours at birth.

Or perhaps Sinclair just enjoys livening up what many consider to be a sport with excitement levels tantamount to watching paint dry on a winter’s day. He has, after all, got form.

Here’s our man at Dunham Forest in Cheshire (green fees a much more reasonable £49 on a weekday). Lime helps to camouflage the golfer on the fairways and greens.

Lead

And here’s the working class hero at West Lancashire Golf Club (weekday green fees £95 a round). That orange and salmon look really is something to die for.

tucker

Meanwhile, back on the picket line (no doubt Sinclair has been in mobile telephone contact from the clubhouse with those at the coalface), the MoJ has already notified some law firms that they have failed to bag legal aid contracts.

The Law Gazette reported yesterday that Whitehall bureaucrats have put their skates on and released disappointing results early — they had been scheduled to alert firms of tendering outcomes next month.

The post Working class hero leads strike against government legal aid cuts from the tee appeared first on Legal Cheek.

City firms fall over themselves to trumpet benefits of working one day-a-week from home

$
0
0

“Agile working” is the latest corporate law trend

Lead

A host top law firms has come out to proclaim new “agile working” initiatives that give solicitors greater flexibility.

Clifford Chance, Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) and Linklaters have announced schemes that enable lawyers to work from home one day-a-week.

A spokesperson from Linklaters — where 7% of staff work flexibly — said that the policy was launched after previous successful trials. She told Legal Cheek today:

In London we trialled a formal flexible/agile working arrangement to break down preconceptions. This involved allowing anyone who wished to do so, to work from home one day a week. Some did, some didn’t, but the option was open to all, talked about and championed. Since this pilot we have had other groups adopt this approach.

CC and Herbies are operating similarly, with the magic circle firm actively encouraging partners to work from home, according to The Lawyer, and HSF having brought in agile working following a similar practice run to that used by Linklaters.

Other firms to encourage solicitors to work flexibly include Mishcon de Reya, Quinn Emanuel , Wedlake Bell, Foot Anstey and DAC Beachcroft. Notably, the former duo announced their initiatives through brash statements, with Mischon’s boss Kevin Gold bellowing last year, “Work three-day weeks and take unlimited holidays”, and Quinn pledging £1,200 to each of its lawyers to go anywhere in the world they chose for a week — to work remotely.

Unsurprisingly, such pronouncements tend to be met with scepticism by world weary trainees and junior lawyers, many of whom privately admit to seeing a disconnect between firms’ public statements on flexible working and reality.

One trainee at a top City law firm indicated to Legal Cheek this afternoon that the ability to work one day-a-week from home meant relatively little in the context of a life “chained to my Blackberry, which is constantly buzzing with urgent work emails throughout the evening”. He added:

I fail to see how this flexible working scheme will improve my work/life balance. The option to work from home one day a week — which is effectively a token gesture by firms — fails to adequately address the high stress levels and chronic hours faced by many lawyers in the City. In addition to this, I prefer keeping my work and home life separate.

The post City firms fall over themselves to trumpet benefits of working one day-a-week from home appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Solicitor struck off after fiddling train fares to pay LPC debts

$
0
0

Tribunal accepted young lawyer was under huge post-education financial pressure — but fraud is fraud

Lead

A young solicitor has been struck off the roll after fiddling train fares in a bid to raise cash to pay off student debts.

Nancy Lee — formerly an associate at London West End law firm Russells Solicitors, who qualified in 2009 — was convicted of fraud at a London magistrates’ court two years ago.

The offences involved the making of five false claims for refunds on tickets from various train companies, with Lee fraudulently stating that she did not use them because a family member had died. The scam was uncovered during a train company audit.

The Nottingham University law graduate avoided jail, but was handed a community order and a bill for £700-plus in compensation. But the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) struck her off at a hearing in the middle of June, the report of which has just been published.

Since her conviction, Lee has moved to Australia where the tribunal heard she was in low paid work and unable to afford the fare to return to London. Her parents represented Lee at the SDT.

The tribunal heard that the Lee’s fraud was triggered as a “consequence of being in debt through having to repay money she had borrowed to fund her university and Legal Practice Course fees”.

According to the SDT report:

She said that the long journeys to and from her place of work each day left her ‘exhausted and stressed’, which led to a ‘lack of judgment’. She also indicated that she accepted that her ‘behaviour has fallen below the standards of conduct expected of a solicitor’ and must be ‘subjected to disciplinary procedures’.

The tribunal approved an application for costs against Lee of more than £2,300. But it also accepted that the former solicitor’s financial circumstances were difficult and ruled that the costs order could not be enforced without leave of the tribunal.

Read the report in full below:

Lee

The post Solicitor struck off after fiddling train fares to pay LPC debts appeared first on Legal Cheek.

The Judge Rules: Accelerated courses — students need to beware

$
0
0

How much sympathy should we feel for the seven students whose firms dropped training contract offers after they failed BPP’s speedy-LPC?

fast

Caveat emptor is a bit of clichéd Latin, but its invocation is bang on the money in relation to the recent furore over BPP Law School’s accelerated Legal Practice Course (LPC).

Legal Cheek and other specialist media reported earlier this week that seven unlucky students had seen their training contracts disappear in a puff of smoke after they failed several LPC modules.

Specifically, the students stumbled over the drafting and the business, law and practice exams at the first time of asking. And while the university would generously allow re-sits, out in the real world, the students’ hard-boiled sponsors and former future employers took a harsher view: one strike and you’re out.

We don’t know exactly which firms were involved in firing the bullets. But we do know that only five Square Mile players form the BPP accelerated consortium: Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Herbert Smith Freehills, Hogan Lovells, Norton Rose Fulbright and Slaughter and May. It could have been one of them, all of them, or a mix.

On its face, the decision by whichever firm or firms it was seems tough in the extreme. Those seven students have had highly prized training contracts snatched from their grasps and now have to dive back into the application scrum for posts that will start much later than they had planned.

Also, there is the risk that they will be branded as the “sacked seven” — the group that rolled the dice on the accelerated LPC only to see the dreaded seven come up.

Some commentators on the Legal Cheek article have suggested that the accelerated course was a bit of a bugger, to put it mildly. Those signing on had not anticipated that shaving 10 weeks off the normal LPC running time would create such exponential levels of intensity.

Likewise, there is an argument that their sponsoring law firm/s should cut this lot a bit of slack. After all, some very bright people do not always perform well in exams — at least the first time round — and by imposing the one-strike rule, the management committees could be missing out on some real talent. After all, the firms were impressed enough with this group to make training contract offers in the first place — surely re-sitting a couple of modules is not too much to ask.

And from a pure economic housekeeping perspective, shouldn’t the firms be a little more flexible? The position regarding LPC fees and living allowances is not clear, but it is unlikely that the firms will be demanding their pounds of flesh back. Therefore, their intransigent hard line first-time-pass rule will cost them some real cash.

Those are all entirely cogent and fair arguments. But law students don’t need to be told (or perhaps they do) that the City law firm training contract recruitment game is brutal. The Square Mile global elite practices can afford to take a hard line because it is a buyers’ market.

So when those seven BPP students thought — for whatever reason — that they would take a punt on the accelerated course, they should have known what they were getting into. It is likely that the firms would have made the pass requirements abundantly clear. If they did not, then that would be a huge dropped stitch — especially for lawyers.

Where there is perhaps a shade of grey is just how clear the law firms and BPP were over the nature and intensity of the accelerated course.

If there is a useful lesson to be drawn from this episode, it is that providers of fast-track and accelerated courses — BPP is not the only player in the game — and sponsoring law firms need to leave students in no doubt over the practical effects of shaving off 20% of the time dedicated to a course.

But ultimately, those buying in to this new breed of hyper-course must beware of what they are signing up for.

Previously:

BPP big wigs silent as failed students are reported sacked from training contracts [Legal Cheek]

The post The Judge Rules: Accelerated courses — students need to beware appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Meek surrender or clever strategic tactic? No one quite knows as lawyers suspend 52 day legal aid strike

$
0
0

Court boycott called off as “gesture of goodwill”

gove-grin

Solicitors and barristers have this morning suspended their 52 day action against further cuts to legal aid despite receiving no offer to settle the dispute — and nobody seems to be quite sure why.

The official line from the Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association and London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ Association is that the move is a “gesture of goodwill” towards Lord Chancellor Michael Gove and his Ministry of Justice pals.

The bodies’ joint statement says that they made the move after having had “the opportunity to engage with the Ministry of Justice” and “provide ideas for long terms savings as a direct alternative to a cut in rates”. It continues:

Although no offer to settle the issue has yet been made, as a gesture of goodwill and recognising the importance of this engagement we firmly believe that the time is right to suspend the action with immediate effect. By doing so we hope the relationship which has now been established will continue into the future. There are many challenges ahead and the engagement to date is a sign that those challenges can be debated constructively in a receptive atmosphere.

The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has backed the move, with its boss, Mark Fenhalls QC, reporting recent “productive dialogue with the MoJ” that has led him to conclude:

There is no reason why barristers should not accept any fresh instructions.

But many legal aid lawyers on Twitter are not taking these pronouncements at face value, indicating that the criminal lawyer professional bodies have decided to “roll over”. Among the dissatisfied is Simon Myerson QC, who indicated that the strike had hit cash-strapped junior barristers particularly hard — and the decision not to follow-though with it effectively made it pointless.

But others, such as the respected legal affairs commentator David Allen Green (who tweets as Jack of Kent), suggested that the decision was a “strategic” power play designed to strengthen lawyers’ position in their ongoing negotiations with the MoJ.

Green noted that the strike hadn’t been cancelled altogether, with legal aid lawyers now presumably able to use the threat of further action as they try to hammer out a deal.

However it all pans out, the news will come as a relief to the creaking justice system, which has been mired in chaos since the strike began on 1 July and gained traction when barristers joined in at the end of that month. The turmoil — which was unleashed in a bid to prevent criminal solicitor fees being slashed by a second 8.75 per cent reduction in 15 months — reached its zenith on 10 August when two defendants charged with murder reportedly appeared without representation at Sheffield Crown Court.

The post Meek surrender or clever strategic tactic? No one quite knows as lawyers suspend 52 day legal aid strike appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Viewing all 4559 articles
Browse latest View live