Quantcast
Channel: Solicitors – Legal Cheek
Viewing all 4559 articles
Browse latest View live

Herbert Smith Freehills retains 80% of its autumn NQs

$
0
0

As national outfit Mills & Reeve posts 79% result

The London office of international heavyweight Herbert Smith Freehills has confirmed an autumn retention figure of 80%.

The outfit, which provides around 70 training contacts annually, has revealed that from a September qualifying cohort of 35, 31 had applied for permanent positions. With 28 soon-to-be associates getting the nod, this gives Herbies an overall retention result of 80%.

Four of the firm’s newly qualified (NQ) lawyers will be based overseas: two in Paris, one in Singapore and one in Dubai. The remaining 24 will be based at Herbies’ HQ in London.

Legal Cheek’s Most List shows that upon qualification, the outfit’s new recruits will earn an impressive £82,000 a year. Currently, year one trainees earn £44,000, rising to £48,000 in year two.

James Baily, training principal at the firm, said:

We are very pleased that four of our London trainees in this round are qualifying into overseas offices, which demonstrates the global opportunities that are available for our trainee solicitors.

Traditionally, the elite litigation specialist (which even has its own in-house Advocacy Unit) is a strong retention performer. Earlier in 2017 it posted a spring score of 77% (27 out of 35), while this time last year it racked up an impressive rate of 94% (31 out of 33).

So what is lawyer life like at Herbies? Well, according to Legal Cheek’s Trainee and Junior Lawyer Survey, it’s pretty good. The firm scored A*s for its training, perks and secondment opportunities abroad, as well as As for the likes of quality of work, peer support and that all important canteen.

Elsewhere, national outfit Mills & Reeve has confirmed that 16 of its 19 September NQs are staying put. With one newbie being placed on a fixed-term contract, this equates to a 79% autumn result. The firm — which offers around 18 training contract positions annually — revealed that eight newbies will be based in Cambridge, three in Norwich, two in London, two in Manchester and one in Birmingham. They will start on a salary of £40,000.

Today’s results round off a busy week for retention news. International law firm Watson Farley & Williams posted a perfect 100% result (15 out of 15), swiftly followed by Mishcon de Reya (64% or nine out of 14) and Stephenson Harwood (90% or nine out of ten). Yesterday, raising eyebrows across the City, Kirkland & Ellis revealed that just five of its nine NQs were staying on at the firm post qualification (56%).

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Herbert Smith Freehills retains 80% of its autumn NQs appeared first on Legal Cheek.


Law student’s embarrassing mum bids to land him Freshfields vac scheme

$
0
0

Noooooooo!

A law student’s mum has raised eyebrows after tweeting a magic circle law firm to ask them why they hadn’t approached her son about next year’s vacation scheme.

On Monday, the embarrassing mum, who describes herself in her Twitter bio as “Proud Mummy to my gorgeous son who is studying Law”, publicly enquired as to when Freshfields “will be emailing students regarding next years vacation scheme”, adding “my son was told it would be in July”.

The mum has form in this department. In June she tweeted Citadel Chambers barrister Rupert Jones asking if he could offer her son some work experience.

Perhaps wisely, the mum has now made her tweets private. Before she was able to do this, the legal blog RollOnFriday spent some time trawling through her Twitter posts to unearth previous tweets from a year ago in which the mum lambasted various local newspapers for not reporting on her son’s schools’ A-level results.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Law student’s embarrassing mum bids to land him Freshfields vac scheme appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Reed Smith keeps 12 out of 14 qualifying trainees, including King & Wood Mallesons’ survivor

$
0
0

Firm also reveals its training contract applications have almost doubled

The London office of international law firm Reed Smith has posted an autumn 2017 retention figure of 86%.

Of the 14 final seat trainees due to qualify this September, Reed Smith confirmed that 12 will be staying on as associates. Three newly-qualified (NQ) lawyers are commercial disputes bound, while a further two will join the firm’s corporate team. The remaining seven autumn newbies will join: the financial industry group, shipping, energy and natural resources, entertainment and media, real estate, labour and employment, and intellectual property.

The firm — which offers around 24 London training positions annually — confirmed that all 12 soon-to-be associates are on permanent contracts.

Among Reed Smith’s new recruits is a former King & Wood Mallesons (KWM) trainee. Following the collapse of KWM’s UK, European and Middle East (EUME) arm earlier this year, a host of City firms came forward to help its 60 or so stranded trainees in a rescue mission first revealed by Legal Cheek. Reed Smith took three of KWM’s wannabe lawyers. One is staying on, one is leaving this autumn, and the final KWM recruit will qualify next year.

Commenting on the result, Reed Smith’s training principal, Samantha Roberts, said:

We are pleased to maintain a strong trainee retention rate this autumn. 86% of our qualifiers will be staying on to progress their careers with us, including trainees who joined us from KWM in January. This represents a 19% increase on last year’s autumn retention rate. Our retention rate reflects both the high quality of our trainees as well as the firm’s philosophy of recruiting the best talent.

If this retention news makes you hungry for Reed Smith trainee life, be prepared to face more applicants than usual. Highlighting the intense competition among aspiring solicitors, Roberts added:

We continue to see an increase in applications for our training contracts and this year the numbers have almost doubled, reflecting the firm’s reputation and the attractiveness of the experience on offer. We extend our very best wishes to those pursuing new opportunities outside the firm.

Legal Cheek’s Most List shows that Reed Smith’s new associates will start on a salary of £70,000. Its trainees currently pocket £40,000 in year one, rising to £44,000 in year two.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Reed Smith keeps 12 out of 14 qualifying trainees, including King & Wood Mallesons’ survivor appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Can you start a training contract without having completed the LPC?

$
0
0

We asked the Solicitors Regulation Authority for its advice on this little-known route to qualification

A Legal Cheek reader has approached us with this query about the Legal Practice Course (LPC):

Do you have to have finished the LPC before you undertake a training contract? My daughter is set to do the LPC in September but has been asked to start a two-year training contract as soon as possible.

Though the most common, well-known route to solicitor qualification is — and has long been — to complete your postgrad vocational education before you start your training, it’s not the only way. As per rules laid down by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), you can study the LPC and do a training contract concurrently — and we wanted to find out more about this little-known route to qualification. We put our reader query to the SRA, and here is its response:

You do not have to finish an LPC before staring a training contract.

You can also train while studying the LPC, but if you are therefore working part-time, your training contract will be extended.

SRA regulations say that the total length of time spent training depends on the usual number of days worked each week (not including overtime or weekend work). For example, a full-time training period, where a trainee works five days per week, is for two years (730 calendar days, or 522 working days).

So, as a guide, if the trainee works:

· two and a half days per week, the period is four years (1,460 calendar days)

· three days per week, the period is three years and four months (1,216 calendar days)

· four days per week, the period is two years and six months (913 calendar days)

The time spent in a part-time-study training contract counts at half time (i.e. two years in the part-time-study training contract counts as one year of the total training period). More information on this can be accessed via the SRA’s ‘Authorised Training Provider information pack’.


Do you have a qualification query? Send it in to tips@legalcheek.com and let us help get it answered.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Can you start a training contract without having completed the LPC? appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Stephenson Harwood boosts trainee lawyer pay as it becomes latest firm to allow working from home

$
0
0

An extra £1,000 chucked at NQs too

Stephenson Harwood has chucked modest pay increases at its trainees and junior lawyers, as it becomes the latest City outfit to implement a ‘home-desking’ policy.

The firm, which offers 18 training contract positions annually, has upped first year trainee pay from £38,500 to £40,000 (4%), while those a year ahead will now receive £44,000 rather than £42,500 (4%). Wedge for newly qualified (NQ) lawyers has been nudged 2% from £65,000 to £66,000.

Stephenson Harwood confirmed to Legal Cheek that trainee pay rises are effective from September, while new NQ salaries were introduced last month.

Legal Cheek’s 2017 Most List shows that Stephenson Harwood’s NQs are now £1,000 better off than their counterparts at Dentons and Osborne Clarke, and £2,000 ahead of junior lawyers at Eversheds Sutherland (£64,000). Sitting just above Stephenson Harwood on the NQ pay scale is CMS, which pays its London associates £67,500.

The pay increases come in the same week Stephenson Harwood officially joined the flexi-working movement.

Following a successful trial last year, the firm has confirmed its London lawyers will now be able to take advantage of a new flexible working initiative, which will allow them to work from home one day per week. Support staff will also be able to work from home, albeit on a reduced offering of one day per fortnight.

However, the scheme will not be open to all. Lawyers “whose physical presence in the office is an integral part of their role” will still be expected to brave the morning rush hour. The outfit has confirmed to Legal Cheek that trainees are not able to take advantage of the policy due to supervision requirements.

Commenting on the roll out, Stephenson Harwood’s chief executive, Sharon White, said:

We recognise the importance of creating a working environment that encourages individual productivity and operational efficiency. Attracting and retaining the very best talent remains a priority, and implementing this scheme enables us to provide employees with more flexibility without compromising client work.”

The news follows similar policies introduced by a large number of City firms over the past year or so.

In April, global outfit Reed Smith implemented an agile working initiative which allows its lawyers to work away from the office and operate on flexible hours. This followed comparable schemes by, among others, Macfarlanes, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, White & Case, Shearman & Sterling and Herbert Smith Freehills.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Stephenson Harwood boosts trainee lawyer pay as it becomes latest firm to allow working from home appeared first on Legal Cheek.

How City law prepares you for the *joys* of motherhood

$
0
0

One associate can’t help but see comparisons between her crying newborn baby and her demanding clients

In March this year, I sat down to my first NCT antenatal class. For the uninitiated, this is a way of spending £300 to meet some other prospective parents and simultaneously be patronised by a woman wielding a knitted breast and insisting that a bit of deep breathing is a perfectly adequate alternative to an epidural (spoiler alert: it’s not).

But something was familiar about the set-up: the air of competitiveness (whose bump is neatest?), the sizing up of potential coffee/lunch-date mates and above all the middle-class anxiety of the whole thing.

Then it struck me: it reminded me of nothing so much as a cohort of new trainees meeting each other for the first time. I couldn’t help but wonder… (as they used to say on a TV show before your time) whether being a lawyer might not be bad preparation for parenthood. And so it has proved…

Demanding clients

Dealing with the urgent demands of someone who expects you to guess what they want while simply getting angrier and louder? Second nature to a City solicitor. And the coping strategies are more or less the same: try to anticipate their needs (from “commercial awareness” to recognising the tell-tale grimace of “poo face”), throw money at the problem (whether it’s a fancy client lunch or frantic late-night purchases from Amazon’s “gullible parents” section) and if all else fails just shove your tits in their face.

Sleepless nights

As soon as someone catches you throwing up in the office loos, people start telling you (with varying degrees of smugness) to expect severely disrupted sleep. But how much rest is the average lawyer getting anyway? From pulling all-nighters on corporate deals to answering emails 24/7, the concept of down-time has yet to gain traction in most firms. The sinking feeling you get when your newborn wakes up mere minutes after the last night feed is no different from the dread of seeing an email from your supervising partner at 6am on a Saturday. And at least a baby’s failure to understand that you’re a separate person is developmentally appropriate. Clive in Comm Lit has no such excuse.

Pointless one-upmumship

The uber-competitive trainee, with their unyielding enthusiasm and aggressive networking, has their annoying parental equivalents, whether it’s the attachment-parenting mother who loudly decries bottle-feeding and boasts about her drug-free hypnobirth, or the latte dad ostentatiously adjusting the straps on his Baby Bjorn sling.

Ignoring them becomes easier when you remember that their lawyer counterparts tend to end up on beta-blockers at the age of 27. And the irritation of having complete strangers volunteer their views on your child-rearing skills is a little easier to bear when you’re used to having to gather feedback from a veritable army of partners (who barely remember your name) for your end of seat appraisal.

Oh, and before the below the line commenters weigh in with some trademark Legal Cheek “appreciation” — you lot are fluffy amateurs compared to a Mumsnet bitchfest.

WaitroseLaw is a solicitor in London.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post How City law prepares you for the *joys* of motherhood appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Late night and early morning courts are ‘not a disguised attempt’ to force lawyers to work more, insists top judge

$
0
0

Lord Fulford moves to soothe profession after outcry over 8am-8pm justice

New late night and early morning courts are not a cunning plan to get lawyers to work more, the leading judge in charge of their roll-out has vowed.

Lord Fulford’s move to pacify solicitors and barristers worried about 8am-8pm justice was delivered via a letter sent this week in which he set out to “demystify” the controversial pilot scheme.

In the missive, Fulford states that longer and more flexible court hours are “not a disguised attempt to persuade, or force, judges, court staff, legal professionals and others to spend more time at court than they do at present”.

He goes on to emphasise that court sessions will be split to enable a longer court day but “populated by different people”. The Court of Appeal man adds:

I regret the extent of the widely-broadcast misunderstandings and ill-informed comments from a range of sources.

Fulford is referring to the many negative reactions the proposed late night and early morning courts have provoked since they were first mooted in May.

Among the critics have been the Law Society’s current president, Joe Egan, and his predecessor, Robert Bourns. Both have drawn attention to the cheekiness of asking criminal legal aid lawyers to attend court during antisocial hours when they have basically had a pay freeze for the last two decades. The Criminal Law Association, the Criminal Bar Association and the Bar Council have also voiced their disapproval in strong terms.

A particular concern is the impact that working anti-social hours could have on diversity. Bar Council chair Andrew Langdon QC said:

These arrangements will make it almost impossible for parents with childcare responsibilities to predict if they can make the school run or to know when they will be able to pick children up from the child-minders. The biggest impact will be on women. Childcare responsibilities still fall disproportionately to women, many of whom do not return to the profession after having children. It is hard to see how these plans sit with the government’s commitment to improving diversity in the profession and the judiciary.

This point was addressed specifically by Fulford, who wrote:

If it works it works; if it doesn’t, it doesn’t…a significant, detrimental impact on diversity in the professions is not a price judges are willing to pay.

The extended hours pilot will be conducted at six courts for six months from the autumn. Three are in London (Blackfriars, Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court and Brentford) and three are in the north (Newcastle, Sheffield and Manchester).

It’s worth noting that at none of the courts will full 8am-8pm sessions take place, with the longer hours being trialled at different times across the various locations.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Late night and early morning courts are ‘not a disguised attempt’ to force lawyers to work more, insists top judge appeared first on Legal Cheek.

DLA Piper bumps London NQ pay by 7% to £75,000

$
0
0

Global outfit’s trainees will also receive extra cash

DLA Piper has bumped up the pay packets of its London-based newly-qualified (NQ) solicitors and trainees.

Until recently, fresh-faced associates at the global outfit had enjoyed a salary of £70,000. They will now take home £75,000 — a modest pay rise of £5,000 or 7%. Legal Cheek’s Most List shows that DLA’s London lot are now on an earning par with their peers at Hogan Lovells, Norton Rose Fulbright and Travers Smith, and a full £3,000 better off than NQs at Ashurst and Baker & McKenzie (£72,000).

DLA has also confirmed that trainee pay has been upped. Those in the first year of their training contract will now pocket £44,000, up from £42,000, while those a year ahead will earn £49,000, up from £47,000. These salary boosts equate to a rise of 5% and 4% respectively.

Further up the ladder, associates with one-year post qualification experience (PQE) will see their salaries bumped from £76,500 to £82,000 (7%), while associates with two years PQE under their belts will now trouser £95,000, up from £85,000 (12%). According to DLA, the new associate figures are “average earnings” and include “bonus potential”.

The boosts come after the firm took the decision to push back its spring salary reviews until July to assess what other firms were going to do. Commenting on the pay increases — which will be backdated to May — DLA’s managing partner, Sandra Wallace, said:

We consistently recognise the contributions of our people and want to reward them competitively. With that in mind, delaying our associate salary review was the right decision to make; it’s meant that we are now better positioned in the market — both in London and the rest of England.

Trainee pay at DLA’s regional offices remains unchanged at £27,000 for first years and £30,000 for second years. Meanwhile, NQs outside London will receive an extra £1,000, taking their final salaries to £42,000.

The firm, which offers around 75 training contracts annually, scored As in Legal Cheek’s 2016 Trainee and Junior Lawyer Survey for training, quality of work, social life, partner-approachability, peer support and international secondment opportunities.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post DLA Piper bumps London NQ pay by 7% to £75,000 appeared first on Legal Cheek.


Linklaters trainee sends ‘LADZZ’ email to female partner

$
0
0

‘I am dead’

A trainee at magic circle outfit Linklaters has discovered first-hand why attention to detail is imperative, after accidentally CC-ing a partner into a “LADZZ” email.

The Inbetweeners-esque email kicks off with the unnamed trainee attempting to drum up support for an early morning kickabout with six of his Linklaters buddies. Describing it as “footie AVEC LA LADZZ,” the Archbishop of Banterbury trainee suggests that they then grab a quick shower at the office before having a “team breakfast with macho banter”.

Intriguingly the trainee’s message (replicated above) goes on to suggest the magic circle gang bring back “dick of the week”. The email went viral around the City and was subsequently picked up by legal blog RollOnFriday.

With responses flooding in, it was at this point the trainee — who briefly changed his email sign-off to “Self-elected Leader of Football Men” — realised he had inadvertently CC-ed in a female partner. A follow-up email to his fellow trainees sums the error up nicely:

That is the partner I work with. I am dead.

Fortunately for the trainee (and his chances of retention upon qualification), his Linklaters superior didn’t seem to mind the lad jokes, replying to all: “footie AVEC LA LADZZ not really my bag but thanks for asking…”. The trainee eventually updated the group:

She has replied saying not to worry, it happens to everyone, and it least it wasn’t embarrassing. Told me to take it as a lesson in email addressee autofilling. It was very embarrassing, very, but still. I could cry. I have meetings with her nearly every day.

Linklaters declined to comment.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Linklaters trainee sends ‘LADZZ’ email to female partner appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Half of Weil Gotshal’s qualifying trainees quit despite receiving NQ job offers

$
0
0

Firm says it’s because roles couldn’t be found in desired practice areas, as rumours swirl about low morale

Weil Gotshal & Manges has retained just half of its London autumn qualifiers despite offering places to all trainees, Legal Cheek can reveal.

Five out of ten newbies will be staying on at the big money US outfit, equating to a retention rate of 50%. This is uncharacteristically low for the firm, which racked up 100% scores in 2015 and 2016.

The firm has put the 50% result down to newly qualified lawyers (NQs) being unable to work in their department of choice. (It’s understood this is what’s behind fellow low retainer Kirkland & Ellis’ 56% figure, too.) A Weil Gotshal spokesperson said:

We were pleased to be able to offer qualification opportunities for our trainee cohort qualifying in September 2017. Unfortunately, however, some of our trainees were keen to qualify into groups which have taken a number of NQs in recent intakes and we were disappointed not to have been able to offer contracts to every trainee in the groups of their choice.

It added: “We are looking forward to seeing those who have secured NQ positions with the firm flourish in their new roles and we thank those whose are leaving us for their hard work and contribution to the office and wish them the very best for the future.”

However, Legal Cheek has been told from sources within the firm that:

The trainees leaving have chosen to leave because they are unhappy.

This, they said, is at least in part because of what has been described as “low morale”. Weil Gotshal declined to comment on this.

Though there’s maybe not as many of them as the firm had hoped, the Weil Gotshal NQs are set for a lucrative lawyer life. The outfit — which offers approximately 13 training contracts a year — is one of the best paying firms in the City. Its new talent will be raking in a whopping £115,000, a full £30,000 more than its closest magic circle rival. You can see what all the top law firms pay by looking at the Legal Cheek Most List.

The firm performed decently in the Legal Cheek Trainee and Junior Lawyer Survey. The New York-headquartered player scored As for peer support, partner approachability, perks, and office, plus that all important canteen.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Half of Weil Gotshal’s qualifying trainees quit despite receiving NQ job offers appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Simmons & Simmons, Holman Fenwick Willan and Ince & Co boost junior lawyer salaries

$
0
0

Trainees also handed modest rises

A trio of City law firms have upped pay for their trainee and junior lawyers.

Simmons & Simmons, which dishes out roughly 35 training contacts annually, has increased wedge for its London-based newly-qualified lawyers (NQs) by 4% to £71,000. The outfit has also boosted first year trainee pay from £40,000 to £42,000 (5%), while those a year ahead will now receive £47,000 rather than £45,000 (4%).

The firm’s Bristol year one and year two trainees are also cashing in. They will now take home £37,000 and £38,000 respectively (3% increases for each year).

Legal Cheek’s Most List shows that today’s increases puts Simmons & Simmons’ London NQs on a pay parallel with their peers at K&L Gates, and £1,000 better off than those at Berwin Leighton Paisner, Reed Smith and Watson Farley Williams.

Next up, Holman Fenwick Willan (HFW). The firm has increased NQ pay from £58,000 to £62,000 (7%), while simultaneously upping trainee salaries by £1,000 (3%) across the board. They will now earn £37,000 in year one, rising to £39,000 in year two.

The rises put the firm’s newbie associates on an earning par with those at the likes of northern giant Addleshaw Goddard and City outfit Bird & Bird, and a grand ahead of NQs at Charles Russell Speechlys. Legal Cheek’s HFW profile shows the firm offers around 15 training contracts annually.

Finally, Ince & Co has confirmed modest increases of its own. NQs at the shipping specialist will now earn £63,250, a 2% increase from £62,000. Those in the first year of their training contract will now pocket £37,750, up from £37,000 (2%), while those a year ahead will take home £41,800, up from £41,000 (2%).

The firm’s fresh-faced associates are now £250 better off than their counterparts at Clyde & Co, Fieldfisher, Mishcon de Reya and Taylor Wessing. Ince & Co — which has 12 offices in eight countries — provides around ten City training positions each year.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Simmons & Simmons, Holman Fenwick Willan and Ince & Co boost junior lawyer salaries appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Exclusive: Gowling WLG partner’s ‘disability quip’ nearly collapses misconduct investigation

$
0
0

And nobody laughed

Sandwell Council House in Oldbury, West Midlands

A Gowling WLG-led probe into the alleged misconduct of a senior council official was thrown into chaos after one of its partners made a “disability quip” during a meeting.

In 2015, a probe was launched into the actions of Sandwell councillor Mahboob Hussain. The now ex-deputy leader was accused, among other things, of procuring the sale of council land to family friends below market value, and having parking ticket fines issued to family members revoked.

Keen to get to the bottom of the allegations, the West Midlands-based council instructed international law firm Wragge & Co (now Gowling WLG) to carry out an independent investigation into Hussain’s purported misconduct.

Now, thanks to a recently published High Court judgment, Legal Cheek can reveal that the lengthy investigation was thrown into turmoil after Gowling lawyer Mark Greenburgh made “personal and derogatory observations” about Hussain’s daughter and her children.

According to the judgment, Greenburgh — who was tasked with overseeing the investigation — met with senior Sandwell council officials, including chief executive Jan Britton, in October 2015. It continues:

At the meeting Mr Greenburgh made what was subsequently described by Mr Britton as ‘…a passing quip about the disabilities of Cllr Hussain’s daughter and her children being due to inbreeding’.

When Legal Cheek got in touch with Gowling WLG regarding this, the firm declined to comment. Greenburgh also did not respond when we contacted him.

Despite the employment specialist’s comments creating “serious disquiet”, it was ultimately decided by council officials that Greenburgh, a partner in Gowling’s London office, should continue with the investigation due to it now being in its advanced stages. However, taking precautions, the ruling notes:

[A]ll the evidence and the resultant report should then be submitted to leading counsel for independent and objective advice on the merits of the investigation, the implication of the solicitor’s [Greenburgh] derogatory comments, as to whether the solicitors report should be published, and as to appropriate next steps.

The judgment containing Greenburgh’s comments relates to a judicial review challenge brought by Hussain. He had argued that the council’s decision to “plough on” with the report, despite Greenburgh’s remarks, amounted to “bias”, and placing it in the public domain breached his human rights.

However, rejecting Hussain’s claims, Mr Justice Green ruled that the council had handled the Greenburgh situation appropriately and that there was a “pressing public interest” in the misconduct allegations.

According to a local media report, Hussain — who police found had no criminal case to answer in relation to the allegations — will face a council standards committee in the coming weeks.

Read the judgment in full below:

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Exclusive: Gowling WLG partner’s ‘disability quip’ nearly collapses misconduct investigation appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Top London solicitor slams ‘arrogant’ Cambridge law students bidding to displace lawyers with AI ‘nonsense’

$
0
0

He didn’t hold back

Cambridge students Ludwig Bull and Jozef Maruscak

An Edwin Coe lawyer has described a Cambridge law student-led ‘lawyer v machine’ challenge as “arrogant nonsense”, before stressing to Legal Cheek that law is “a people to people business”.

The ambitious challenge is the brainchild of Oxbridge lawyers Ludwig Bull, Rebecca Agliolo, Jozef Maruscak and Nadial Abdul, who have been plodding away with designing a lawyer robot for some months now.

First launched as crime-identifying LawBot in October 2016, their service then dabbled in divorce law advice before undergoing a rebrand (LawBot X) and moving onto Facebook messenger. If that wasn’t enough, Bull and friends then announced they were launching a cryptocurrency for the legal market.

Now, the latest update is that the students have renamed LawBot X (it’s now called Elexirr) and are putting on a competition called #ElexirrLawyerChallenge to celebrate.

In a promo video set to some funky music that we’ve embedded below, operations guy Maruscak explained: “we realise that there are many sceptics. That’s why we have decided to put our tech to the ultimate test.”

This test will take the form of a “man v machine” competition in London. A panel will supply factual and legal descriptions of legal problems with a known outcome to a robot team and a team of “England’s brightest legal minds.” Whichever side makes the most correct predictions will win.

Elexirr seems pretty hyped about the whole thing, but one person who doesn’t is David Greene, partner and head of litigation and dispute resolution at London law firm Edwin Coe.

Greene — who readers may remember is representing London School of Economics students in proceedings against the university’s student halls — tweeted:

Speaking to Legal Cheek about the rise in AI/tech in law, he said:

That arrogant toad ‘I told you so!’ Susskind has for long been banging on about technology and its effect on legal services. But his is generally about digital technology and the place it has in making the processing and provision of legal advice and assistance more efficient. That does not counter the fundament of the business being a people to people business.

While Greene does believe the Elexirr challenge is “interesting” and in some ways a decent “pointer” to a future of case-predicting computers, for now machines are still lacking in certain human elements.

Despite Greene’s criticisms, Elexirr is sticking by its tech. Bull told us:

As Greene rightly points out, the impact of AI on law is generally hyped. Talk of doomsday scenarios where machines completely replace lawyers show only a superficial understanding of the problem. Still, the human mind and machines have different qualities and attributes. Elexirr is dedicated to leveraging machine intelligence to do things that humans have difficulties with: e. g. case prediction. We hope to learn more about the law in this way and contribute to the legal profession’s transition into the digital age.

However, Greene still doesn’t seem convinced, particularly with Elexirr’s assertion that: “we don’t believe AI/robots will displace lawyers”. He said: “Of course they will displace lawyers; it may give rise to different work, tech always does but much work will be displaced by AI in time.” The debate continues.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Top London solicitor slams ‘arrogant’ Cambridge law students bidding to displace lawyers with AI ‘nonsense’ appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Gordon Dadds raises £20 million as shares hit London Stock Exchange

$
0
0

Full-service outfit does a Gateley

Gordon Dadds has become only the second law firm to take a punt on the London Stock Exchange (LSE).

The full-service outfit confirmed on Friday that it had offered 14.2 million shares on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) at 140p each.

In a public offering that reportedly raised a whopping £20 million, Gordon Dadds’ top brass said it would use the cash to help fund future growth, acquisitions and the repayment of debt. On the opening day of trading the firm’s share price fluctuated between 145p and 147p.

Legal Cheek reported last month that the flotation has come about through an £18.75 million “reverse takeover” deal with AIM-listed investing company Work Group.

Commenting on its inaugural share offering, Gordon Dadds’ chief executive, Adrian Biles, said:

The UK legal services sector is highly fragmented and Gordon Dadds’ proven consolidator model is uniquely positioned to take advantage of this significant market opportunity. We now have the necessary capital to support the group’s next stage of development which will enhance the group’s profile with clients and potential target firm.

According to the latest financials, Gordon Dadds posted a revenue of £25 million last year, an increase of 24% on the year before (£20.2 million). It has offices in London, Cardiff and Bristol, and offers around six training contracts annually.

However, Gordon Dadds isn’t alone. In 2015, national outfit Gateley floated on the LSE, the first firm to do so, with an opening share price of 95p. At the time, we cheekily suggested that training contract hunters could snap up a few in a bid to stand out from the crowd. One law student at a leading London university said:

I hadn’t even heard of this firm until I read about their listing. But now I’m planning to buy a few shares in them and then use that information on my application form when I apply to them. It’s got to be worth a try!

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Gordon Dadds raises £20 million as shares hit London Stock Exchange appeared first on Legal Cheek.

London student moves into Mark Zuckerberg’s old house to develop tech that will ‘take down’ the legal profession

$
0
0

The 20-year-old wants to automate lawyers out of existence

A computer science student has moved into the house Mark Zuckerberg used to rent to spend his days trying to “take down” lawyers with artificial intelligence (AI) bots.

Joshua Browder is the brains behind ‘robot lawyer’ DoNotPay — a programme which helps users with the likes of travel delay compensation and parking tickets. Stanford University student Browder, then 19, told Legal Cheek at the time of its launch: “Lawyers all over the world should be very scared of this technology.”

Now 20, Browder’s confidence in his free lawbot service shows no signs of waning. In a tell-all interview with the Sunday Times, he said:

No one can stop me in the world.

Browder, from Hendon, London, is hoping the next few months will see him raise venture capital — the next step in his plan to automate lawyers out of existence. He is working through the profession one sector at a time: divorce, train ticket refunds, council tax and criminal defence all get a name check in the piece. Browder noted:

I want to be the go-to platform for all legal help.

Whether you think it’s ambitious or ridiculous, it’s hard to deny Browder’s busy schedule. He spends nights drinking Diet Coke and “vile” food replacement liquid Soylent to get through his coding. The computer whizz admits his Stanford studies have become a “side project” and that he has considered dropping out.

AI aside, the print interview also gave readers an insight into Browder’s less than typical family history.

Not only is he the great grandson of former Communist Party head and double US presidential candidate Earl Browder, his father, Bill, is a big name too.

Stanford graduate Bill is the Chief Executive Officer of a top investment fund, Hermitage Capital Management, and a fierce critic of Russian corporate governance. After being expelled from the country, he wrote a book about Russian corruption and the death of his former lawyer Sergei Magnitsky, who Bill claimed: “was murdered as my proxy. If Sergei had not been my lawyer, he would still be alive today.”

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post London student moves into Mark Zuckerberg’s old house to develop tech that will ‘take down’ the legal profession appeared first on Legal Cheek.


Allen & Overy posts 85% autumn retention result

$
0
0

40 out of 47 rookies commit future to magic circle firm

Allen & Overy has revealed a 2017 autumn retention rate of 85%.

Of the 47 trainees due to qualify next month, 40 will be taking up newly qualified (NQ) positions. The magic circle outfit confirmed this afternoon that it had made 41 associate offers, with all but one accepting.

Legal Cheek’s Most List shows that Allen & Overy is one of the biggest training contract providers in the City, dishing out around 90 each year. Trainees at the firm earn £42,000 in year one, rising to £47,000 in year two, and NQs start on a healthy £78,500.

Commenting on today’s autumn result, James Partridge, partner and training principal at Allen & Overy, said:

This is another good result. It’s testament to our compelling offering and commitment to developing exceptional talent.

The firm — which recently offered free space to legal tech start-ups within its plush London HQ — posted an 82% spring retention score (31 out of 38) back in March, and an 86% autumn result (36 out of 42) this time last year.

The latest retention news follows a strong set of financial results. Trouncing its magic circle peers, Legal Cheek reported last month that profit per equity partner (PEP) was up by 26% to £1.51 million, while revenue enjoyed an uplift of 16% to £1.52 billion.

Allen & Overy was one of the standout performers in Legal Cheek’s Trainee and Junior Lawyer Survey. Securing A*s for its perks, international secondment opportunities and canteen, the firm racked up As for, among other things, social life, training and peer support.

The only other magic circle member to release its 2017 autumn retention figure so far is Slaughter and May. The firm, which offers around 80 training contracts each year, kept hold of 29 out of 32 NQs, giving it a score of 91%.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Allen & Overy posts 85% autumn retention result appeared first on Legal Cheek.

8 articles to read if you want to brush up on your commercial awareness

$
0
0

Interview soundbites galore

Any aspiring lawyer will know the tough graduate recruitment process is far less daunting for candidates who have hotshot commercial awareness skills.

You’ll likely fail to get through a training contract interview, maybe even an application form, without being asked about it — so why not brush up now by reading these eight articles?

1. A lesson in commercial awareness from someone who never used to understand it

lead

“Hours can be spent agonising over what exactly you need to show an awareness of, but I think it can be broken down into four basic steps.”

[Read the article]

2. Where will corporate law firms be ten years from now?

“Social media offers all sorts of ways of generating new clients, perhaps most obviously through the promotion of a range of free legal services, potentially involving the use of big data. Kids coming into the profession who are brave and bold enough to embrace some of the possibilities could find themselves very well-placed.”

[Read the article]

3. Why junior lawyers shouldn’t be afraid of AI, by a law student

lead1

“In our homes, Amazon Alexa has become our virtual assistant. IBM Watson and Google Deepmind are pushing the boundaries on what computers can do and countless start-ups are finding exciting applications for AI that can be used today.”

[Read the article]

4. Fintech: Can legislation really drive innovation?

“The term ‘fintech’ is no longer enough — instead we see the spawning of ‘regtech’, ‘paytech’, ‘insurtech’ and others to describe the changes that are coming.”

[Read the article]

5. What ‘commercial awareness’ means when you’re a trainee

FT

“One of the great experiences as a trainee which helps your commercial understanding grow is that the legal sector attracts people with interesting backgrounds.”

[Read the article]

6. Worry more about AI going wrong, says Slaughter and May

“Among the red flags raised by the magic circle firm and perhaps the biggest threat posed by adopting new AI technology is if the software doesn’t work. Computers, like humans, are bound to be stubborn and fail at some point.”

[Read the article]

7. Dates for your diary: The big legal affairs stories to look out for in 2017

lead12

“Here are some of the biggest of the big landmark legal affairs stories set to hit press in the next 12 months.”

[Read the article]

8. How students can turn Brexit to their advantage when applying for training contracts

“There’s never been a better time to impress with your commercial awareness.”

[Read the article]

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post 8 articles to read if you want to brush up on your commercial awareness appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Pinsents pay: NQs up to £68,000 while trainees handed £2,000 increases

$
0
0

A good summer for City law pay

Pinsent Masons has become the latest City law firm to up pay for both its newly qualified (NQ) talent and its trainees, Legal Cheek can reveal.

The international outfit has confirmed that its London associates will begin lawyer life on £68,000, up 5% from £65,000. This pay hike, effective from next month, sees Pinsent Masons leapfrog Osborne Clarke (£65,000), Dentons (£65,000), Stephenson Harwood (£66,000) and CMS (£67,500) on the NQ pay scale.

Deborah McCormack, head of recruitment and graduate development at the firm, said:

We continue to offer our NQs a well-rounded experience combined with a healthy financial package. Our trainees and NQs receive exposure to our impressive client base whilst working in a collaborative and progressive environment.

It’s happy days for the firm’s London trainees too, who will soon earn an extra £2,000 per year. First years at the 22-office commercial powerhouse are up to £40,000, while second years will be raking in £43,000. You can see what all the top firms pay their trainees, and their NQs, on the Legal Cheek Most List.

Moving away from the capital, Pinsent Masons has increased its English regional NQ pay by £2,000 to £42,000. The firm — which offers approximately 72 training contracts a year — will be upping pay in Scotland from £38,000 to £39,000, and in Belfast from £27,000 to £28,000. Second year regional trainees have also been handed a healthy boost from £28,500 to £29,750.

Cash aside, what’s it like to work at Pinsent Masons? The firm, known for its less London-centric approach to legal practice, fared well in the Legal Cheek Trainee and Junior Lawyer Survey. It scored As for training, quality of work, peer support, partner approachability and social life.

Pinsent Masons is one of many firms to up trainee and NQ salaries in what’s shaping up to be yet another summer of City law pay hikes.

To give you a run down: DLA Piper dosh is up 7% to £75,000 for NQs, while Stephenson Harwood has increased lawyer lolly to £66,000 and trainee money by 4% a year. Salaries at Simmons & Simmons are up too, this time to £71,000 in London, with Holman Fenwick Willan and Ince & Co also nudging their NQ money to £62,000 and £63,500 respectively.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Pinsents pay: NQs up to £68,000 while trainees handed £2,000 increases appeared first on Legal Cheek.

‘Sip test’: Coffee-loving lawyers slam new security rules for bringing drinks into court

$
0
0

‘Is this really necessary?’

New security procedures rolled out this week will require solicitors and barristers to complete a “sip test” if they want to bring drinks into court buildings.

Introduced by HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS), the new measures will require all court users to taste unsealed beverages in order to prove the contents are harmless.

Details of the new “sip test” emerged on social media after a Coventry Crown Court official sent an email to lawyers requesting that they “support” its implementation.

The email — a copy of which was tweeted by barrister Andrew Keogh — states that “anyone refusing to comply with this request will be refused access to the court.”

Amusingly, the email goes on to play out a scenario in which a barrister (probably a pupil) has been sent to the local Costa on a caffeine supply mission. It continues:

Often, I see one member of the bar entering the court building with numerous coffee cups having drawn the short straw for the coffee run that day. I just want to highlight that this new security procedure will in such circumstances require the sip test to be conducted on all drinks and not just a single cup.

The new rules — introduced yesterday, according to the email — haven’t gone down well with many lawyers on Twitter.

Rebecca Herbert‏, a criminal barrister at 36 Bedford Row, sensibly suggested that lawyers should be given a special “photo ID”.

Echoing Herbert’s sentiments, Simon Myerson QC argued that lawyers should not be subject to the sip test.

9 Bedford Row’s Max Hardy cheekily claimed that the refreshment analysis could lead to a more intimate security check.

Meanwhile, Keogh too questioned whether the test was a step too far.

Responding to the criticism on Twitter, HMCTS chief executive Susan Acland-Hood said that the sip test approach is “based on good security advice.” However, she did note Herbert’s photo ID suggestion and reassured lawyers she would look into it.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post ‘Sip test’: Coffee-loving lawyers slam new security rules for bringing drinks into court appeared first on Legal Cheek.

A trainee solicitor’s experience of law firm innovation

$
0
0

Reed Smith’s Shannon Diggory reports from the City frontline

With the constant media buzz surrounding the wonders of artificial intelligence (AI) and other disruptive technologies in legal practice, it can often seem that the well-trodden career path of the trainee and junior lawyer is now under threat.

Furthermore, it is unclear how legal education should best harness these technological developments to prepare aspiring trainees for work in law firms and in-house legal teams in the next five years. Future trainees are now asking questions such as, “Should I be able to code, be commercial, be a data scientist and be able to automate myself?”

Conversely, legal jobseekers will be able to take advantage of the new positions heralded by the age of innovation, with fancy job titles like ‘innovation manager’, ‘knowledge engineer’ and ‘product manager’.

What does innovation even mean?

The term innovation is used (and misused) to mean a multitude of things in the legal industry and in our clients’ industries, with no real distinction being made between activity and output. At Reed Smith, we view it as constantly thinking differently about how we do things, while always having the client’s desired outcome in mind. As a trainee, you are perfectly placed to embrace innovation right from the start of your career; you are not yet set in your ways, and you can bring fresh eyes to many problems requiring a solution.

The result of this approach can be small changes or radical proposals, but all are equally valuable. To only consider radical change to be truly innovative is to miss improving things incrementally and fixing the basics.

Getting comfortable with innovation

Reed Smith’s innovation team has focused a significant amount of time in the last 12 months on the issues of future skills and roles, and getting lawyers comfortable with being creative (a harder task than you might imagine!). As trainees, we are encouraged to attend the frequent innovation sessions held in our Innovation Hub (see video below), a space which is a blank canvas for using creative and innovative techniques, and to put forward our ideas for innovation projects.

The Innovation Hub uses service design techniques, and is run by an innovation manager with over a decade of experience building digital legal products using techniques that put the end user or client at the heart of designing the service. Reflective of this client focus is the fact that we have had our clients come to the firm and present to us about how they see innovation benefitting their company and industry sector.

The real boon of this push for innovation in the legal sector is that it is one area in which the playing field is levelled between lawyers of all levels of seniority. When discussing innovation, it is the idea that takes precedence, not the experience of the individual presenting that idea. As such, Reed Smith has created a platform from which trainees and junior lawyers are able to have a real impact on the future of the firm.

This year we also extended this approach to our summer vacation scheme by including in the agenda a three-hour session around innovation.

Playing out a client scenario

To get the summer vacation students into this mindset, we gave them an employment law problem-solving task created by one of our Reed Smith innovation champions. Two teams tackled the task, which required them to consider how to respond to a fictional client (a HR director) on their company’s issues regarding retention of staff and protection of confidential information, in the face of multiple employees moving to competitor companies and a standard employment contract that was not up to scratch. The task was how to use their legal skills, their understanding of the fictional client, and an innovative approach (potentially using digital technology), to ultimately deliver a great solution.

The obvious place to start was the law itself but, using some techniques around personas and putting oneself in the clients’ shoes, it became more about the client and a focus on their world and their pressures, and on the broader issue of retaining and attracting talent to the business and how to best manage a change of contract for the existing employees.

For the teams, this was an exercise in how to be client-centric from the start, and to remember that a perfect legal outcome nonetheless may have unintended practical, commercial and personal ramifications within a business. In that sense, the exercise aimed to demonstrate that innovation is broader than the way in which we work and whether we choose to use disruptive technologies; it begins with the way in which we think as lawyers.

Once the students had cultivated their innovative approach, they also looked at how a digital approach that used automation, AI, and data and collaboration tools could deliver a standout result to the busy HR director and simplify a large-scale roll-out of new or amended employment contracts.

Thinking differently about legal services

The firm received excellent feedback from vacation scheme students who took part in the sessions:

Being able to work in an environment such as the hub enabled me to foster my innovation and push myself in ways I didn’t think were possible! Not only was I able to personally grow, the session enabled me to develop my collaborative skills and get to know those on the scheme in a personal and fun way.

I thoroughly enjoyed the Innovation Hub session. It was a good ice-breaker exercise because it required everyone to work as a team to solve an issue. I am a visual learner, so having the ability to illustrate my ideas on a whiteboard wall helped me identify potential solutions and creatively build on them.

The Innovation Hub session was one of the highlights of my vacation scheme at Reed Smith. I learned that an innovatively designed space can encourage innovative approaches, trigger innovative ideas and thereby lead to innovative solutions. I thoroughly enjoyed the atmosphere of creativity and collaboration the Hub breeds.

Reed Smith also recently completed a four-week legal innovation intern programme where, as part of their MA course, two future Reed Smith trainees looked at a real legal service delivery project using legal technology, and applied product development and service design approaches to establish what a future service could look like.

The students worked in an agile approach with the innovation manager and the practice team to design this service and evaluate the legal technologies against the needs. The team also went out to a legal engineering team to learn how tech companies build products to get an external view.

Innovation as an opportunity

Innovation is here to stay, and instead of seeing it as a threat, trainees and junior lawyers should embrace the new platform which it affords them. Every day as a trainee you deal with issues which are completely new to you, and you become used to someone telling you to think differently about something or to come at a problem from a different angle, which does not happen as frequently when you become more senior.

When reviewing your progress, instead of always focusing on the answer you came to, think hard about all the ways you tried to reach that solution. Capitalise on the inventive approaches that inexperience fosters and you will already be using innovation to your advantage.

Shannon Diggory is a trainee solicitor at Reed Smith in London.

About Legal Cheek Careers posts.

The post A trainee solicitor’s experience of law firm innovation appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Viewing all 4559 articles
Browse latest View live