Quantcast
Channel: Solicitors – Legal Cheek
Viewing all 4559 articles
Browse latest View live

Law firm fidget spinners are now a thing

$
0
0

Freshfields, Milbank and Baker Botts embrace playground craze

It was only a matter of time before lawyers jumped aboard the fidget spinner bandwagon.

The fidget-busting handheld toy has rocketed in popularity across offices and playgrounds in recent months, despite being invented some years ago. So popular are the little gadgets that magic circle outfit Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has slapped its branding across a bunch of them.

Image via David Scholz

But don’t expect one in law fair goodie bags anytime soon (well, at least not from Freshfields).

A spokesperson for the firm told Legal Cheek that the fidget spinners — featuring the firm’s unique angel and spear logo — were part of a one-off batch dished out during an internal event. Nevertheless, it’s worth noting the firm scored an A* for perks in our Trainee and Junior Lawyer Survey. We suspect it was the handheld plastic toys, not the fresh sushi and ski trips, that swung it for the survey respondents.

However, the magic circle firm isn’t alone in its commitment to the craze. Potentially sounding the death knell for the law firm-branded stress ball, US legal news website Above The Law reports that two US giants have also embraced the fidget spinner.

Images via Above The Law

New York-headquartered outfit Milbank and Texas-based giant Baker Botts have both punted for red versions of the handheld toy featuring their respective firm names.

Who said lawyers weren’t cool?

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Law firm fidget spinners are now a thing appeared first on Legal Cheek.


Ex-KWM staff offered £4,000 each over ‘technical breach’ during redundancy process

$
0
0

But the compensation deal is only on the table until Friday

Around 200 former King & Wood Mallesons (KWM) staff have been offered up to £4,000 each after administrators for the outfit’s now defunct European, UK and Middle East (EUME) arm accepted a “technical breach” had occurred during the redundancy process.

Earlier this year, Legal Cheek reported that a claim brought by ex-KWM employees had been given the go-ahead by an employment tribunal. The collective legal action relates to the outfit’s alleged failure to carry out a formal 45-day consultation process prior to axing jobs.

Now, KWM’s appointed administrators, Quantuma, have responded to the claims and accepted that there was an issue during the process. A spokesperson said:

Whilst the firm [KWM] had commenced and undertaken a consultation process, the consultation had concluded early due to the onset of the firm entering administration. As a result, there was a technical breach in respect of the required duration for the consultation process.

Claimants have been offered eight weeks pay capped at £479 per week up to a maximum individual payout of £3,832. If accepted, this will be paid out through the government’s Insolvency Service Redundancy Payments Service (ISRPS). Legal Cheek understands that the ex-employees — represented by Surrey law firm Herrington Carmichael — have until Friday to accept the offer. If they decline, a full employment hearing could be on the cards.

The offer follows the news that just 20 ex-KWM employees are set to benefit from the firm’s hardship fund. Launched in the spring, ex-partners were asked to contribute cash to help staff impacted by the outfit’s collapse. It is understood that between £50,000-£100,000 has been raised so far.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Ex-KWM staff offered £4,000 each over ‘technical breach’ during redundancy process appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Retention rate news: Pinsent Masons posts 74% score

$
0
0

As Forsters reveals perfect 100% result

Global outfit Pinsent Masons will be welcoming 67 newly qualified (NQ) lawyers to its UK ranks this autumn.

Of the 91 soon-to-qualify trainees at the City of London-headquartered firm, 84 applied for associate positions. With 67 signing on the dotted line, Pinsents today posts a 74% retention rate score.

This is not far off the firm’s previous retention score, which was 80%. However it’s a big improvement on the season beforehand (spring 2016) when just 50% of lawyer rookies stayed on.

On today’s news, head of recruitment and graduate development Deborah McCormack said:

We pride ourselves on the inclusive and encouraging culture which gives our trainees the opportunity to thrive and I’m pleased to welcome them to the team.

The news comes just days after Legal Cheek revealed pay at the 22-office firm had been given a healthy boost. London associates will now begin lawyer life on £68,000 (up from £65,000), while Pinsent Masons regional NQ pay is up £2,000 to £42,000. Salaries in Scotland and in Belfast have also been boosted, by £1,000 to £39,000 and £28,000 respectively. Happy days all round.

In other retention rate revelations, private client and real estate outfit Forsters has posted a 100% score. The Mayfair firm has told Legal Cheek it’s retaining all eight of its trainees. On qualification, the new lawyers will earn a tidy £61,000.

Pinsents and Forsters today join the likes of magic circle big shot Allen & Overy and US stalwart Sullivan & Cromwell in the list of firms that have posted their retention scores this week. Allen & Overy’s is 85% (40 out of 47), while Sullivan & Cromwell’s is 100% (four out of four).

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Retention rate news: Pinsent Masons posts 74% score appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Charles Russell Speechlys teams up with ULaw to offer £5,000 scholarship/vac scheme combo

$
0
0

But the deadline is tomorrow 😱

City law firm Charles Russell Speechlys has joined forces with The University of Law (ULaw) to offer a lucky wannabe lawyer a substantial postgraduate scholarship and a stint of work experience.

The collaboration will see one student handed £5,000 to put towards either a Graduate Diploma in Law (GDL), a Legal Practice Course (LPC) or a masters at one of ULaw’s branches this September. Moreover, the successful applicant will also be automatically invited to join Charles Russell Speechlys’ summer placement scheme next year.

Now for the small print.

According to ULaw’s scholarship page, applicants must have obtained (or expect to be awarded) at least a 2:1 in any degree discipline at undergraduate level or international equivalent. Further, you will need to have received an offer from ULaw to study one of their postgrad courses and be from a household where income over the past year has been £25,000 or less. Finally, students who have already secured a training contract cannot apply.

Commenting on the new partnership, Hamish Perry, graduate recruitment partner at Charles Russell Speechlys, said:

The aim of this initiative is to support students who may not have the means to further their studies as well as recognising their hard work and achievements to date. The legal sector offers a multitude of employment opportunities and this scholarship is designed to be a helping hand to recruiting additional talent.

Fancy applying? Well you haven’t got long. Despite Legal Cheek only getting wind of the new scholarship yesterday, the deadline is tomorrow. Interviews are scheduled to take place later this month with the successful candidate being notified no later than 6 September.

Legal Cheek’s Most List shows that Charles Russell Speechlys offers roughly 24 training contracts annually. The private client specialist pays year one trainees £37,000, rising to £39,000 in year two. Newbie associates earn £61,000.

According to ULaw’s website, GDL fees at its London centres (Bloomsbury and Moorgate) currently stand at £10,890, while an LPC will set you back £15,685.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Charles Russell Speechlys teams up with ULaw to offer £5,000 scholarship/vac scheme combo appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Freshfields posts uncharacteristically low trainee retention rate

$
0
0

Legal Cheek called it back in May

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has unveiled a retention score of just 66%, confirming rumours that the magic circle outfit was bracing itself for an uncharacteristically low autumn result.

Of the 41 final seat trainees due to qualify, 27 will be staying on as newly qualified (NQ) associates. The firm, which dishes out around 80 City training contacts each year, said it had made 29 offers. Freshfields’ trainee development partner, Farah Ispahani, said:

Our retention rates across each intake vary as we balance a number of different factors when determining the offers that we make to individuals. We are committed to our existing level of training contracts in London and we expect our medium-term average for retention rates to be upheld.

Today’s disappointing 66% result won’t come as a surprise to our regular readers.

Back in May Legal Cheek revealed that the Anglo-German outfit — amid trainees grumbles about the firm’s personal assistant policy — was readying itself for a score “of around 65%.”

At the time, we speculated that Brexit was to blame, reporting: “As uncertainty prevails about the UK’s future deal with Europe, associates are apparently opting to stick around at the firm longer than normal, with the lower than usual attrition resulting in reduced capacity for NQ talent.” The firm did not comment on these May rumours.

Freshfields is normally a strong retention performer, regularly posting 80% plus, and is one of the top paying outfits in the City. Legal Cheek’s Most List shows that trainees pocket £43,000 in year one, rising to £48,000 in year two. Upon qualification, an NQ will earn a salary of £85,000, and enjoy perks including freshly made sushi and subsidised ski trips. The firm recently saw profit per equity partner (PEP) notch up 5% to £1.55 million.

The only other magic circlers to have released their 2017 autumn figures are Allen & Overy and Slaughter and May. Allen & Overy confirmed this week that 40 out of 47 September qualifiers had opted to stick around, equating to a solid retention score of 85%. Meanwhile, Slaughters kept hold of 29 out of 32 NQs, giving it a score of 91%.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Freshfields posts uncharacteristically low trainee retention rate appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Shearman & Sterling revises down autumn retention figure following trainee numbers oversight

$
0
0

87% 75%

The London office of US titan Shearman & Sterling has revised its 2017 autumn retention figure after it omitted one trainee from its final calculation and another changed her mind.

Last month, Shearman trumpeted an impressive 87% retention result, revealing that 13 of its 15 soon-to-be associates would be staying on. However, it has since emerged that the firm’s newly qualified (NQ) headcount actually stands at 16.

This is because, as a spokesperson for Shearman told Legal Cheek: “One trainee opted out of the qualification process to fulfil a career outside of law which is why we didn’t include them in our numbers.” We understand that the trainee who has opted for a life away from law is in the process of setting up their own business.

Then, after the outfit went to press with its 87% result, one offer-accepting NQ decided to leave the firm. The spokesperson continued:

After we announced our retention rate, one of the NQ lawyers accepted a position elsewhere. We wish her well in her future career.

Crunching the new numbers, Shearman — which offers around 17 training contracts annually — now has a new autumn retention figure of 75%.

Legal Cheek‘s Most List shows that the 12 who have put pen to paper on permanent NQ deals will start on an eye-watering £105,000 a year. This salary puts Shearman’s newbies on a pay par with their peers at fellow US giant White & Case, and a full £20,000 better off than their nearest magic circle rival. The commercial firm’s trainees trouser £45,000, rising to £50,000 in year two.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Shearman & Sterling revises down autumn retention figure following trainee numbers oversight appeared first on Legal Cheek.

London law firm denies knowledge of advert for trainee solicitor job that pays just £10k

$
0
0

You’d earn double that in Aldi, and five times at other outfits

An advert for a trainee solicitor at a law firm in East London includes a dismal salary of £10,000.

The Indeed.com ad, for outfit SS Basi & Co, is looking for a candidate with a year’s legal experience under their belt. Though the advert has since been pulled, it is floating in the Google Cache and has been retrieved by Legal Cheek and is screenshotted below.

A £10,000 salary, assuming a 9am-5pm working day with a paid lunch, equates to £4.81 an hour. A 9am-5pm working day with lunch unpaid would take the hourly rate to £5.49. Both figures are well below the UK minimum wage for early twenty-somethings (£7.05) and the London Living Wage (£9.75) — though do note only the former is a legal requirement.

Satwinder Singh Basi, law firm partner, denies SS Basi pays this rate. He told us:

This is ridiculous. I’ve been here [the firm] since 1994 and all trainees have been paid the minimum rate.

When asked about the Indeed.com listing, he said: “What adverts? I’ve not seen any adverts.”

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) sets a minimum guideline salary consistent with the minimum wage. This means that “an authorised training provider” must pay trainees “at least the single hourly rate of the national minimum wage specified in regulation 11 of the National Minimum Wage Regulations 1999.” Basi appears to realise this, noting:

To pay trainees £10,000 would be in breach of SRA rules. I don’t know what Mickey Mouse outfit you’re running, but we don’t pay that here.

It perhaps goes without saying that £10,000 a year is wildly out of line with what other outfits in the capital pay. Law Society guidelines state London firms should pay their trainees at least £20,913. The Legal Cheek Most List shows £30,000-£40,000 for first year trainees is far from uncommon, with the top firms paying £50,000.

This is, of course, on the lucrative commercial law side of things, whereas Ilford firm SS Basi specialises in more welfare-oriented practice areas like crime and immigration. So to give you a comparison with trainees at more humble organisations: Brighton Housing Trust pays its trainees £21,488 for 37 hours per week; North Kensington Law Centre’s aspiring solicitors earn £23,000 for 35-hour weeks; and trainees at human rights group Liberty enjoy £24,650 for 35 hours too.

But while you might be better off working in a Boots store (£7.70 per hour) or an Aldi (£9.75 per hour) than you would at SS Basi (if the advert is correct), pay over at the bar leaves a lot to be desired too.

In a Legal Cheek feature on legal aid work for junior barristers, one reported earning just £2.40 an hour. Many admitted they consider packing in the job each and every day.

And you can’t even assume you’ll be on London Living Wage at the commercial bar either. Last month we revealed that XXIV Old Buildings, a Lincoln’s Inn-based commercial and chancery law set, was advertising for junior clerks at £16,000 per annum. In fact, the advert is still online today.

A screenshot of the XXIV Old Buildings’ advert (via LPMA website)

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post London law firm denies knowledge of advert for trainee solicitor job that pays just £10k appeared first on Legal Cheek.

You can now do a training contract funded by Children in Need

$
0
0

Social welfare solicitor scheme offers more places than ever

Image via Instagram northern_womble

Applications to a legal education charity’s solicitor training scheme open today with its highest number of places available to date, including posts co-funded by the BBC’s Children in Need.

This is all part of The Legal Education Foundation’s (TLEF) Justice First Fellowship (JFF), a programme that sponsors Legal Practice Course (LPC) graduates through their training contracts. Participants spend two years at various advice centres, charities, law firms and human rights groups, training in legal issues affecting the local community.

Now in its fourth year, JFF’s first cohort of aspiring social welfare lawyers qualified in February 2017, 75% being kept on at their various host organisations. They are now all working as solicitors.

1
This year’s qualifying cohort

The size of the scheme is snowballing. During last year’s recruitment drive, Legal Cheek reported the charity was taking on its biggest cohort ever (13). This year, it’s after 15 LPC grads.

TLEF’s chief executive, Matthew Smerdon, said:

Four years in, and the JFF scheme is building exactly the kind of momentum in the sector that we were hoping for. After this recruitment round, there will be 50 solicitor and barrister fellows in some of the most committed and highly respected social justice organisations in the country.

Host organisations for this year include: human rights group Liberty, Greater Manchester Law Centre, law firm Deighton Pierce Glynn, Hackney Community Law Centre, Minton Morrill Solicitors, and the Speakeasy Advice Centre. Interestingly, the North Kensington Law Centre is also on the list, meaning one trainee will be working with victims of the Grenfell Tower disaster.

Just as interesting is the news that BBC’s Children in Need is helping to co-fund three of the trainee posts, at Just for Kids Law, Coram Children’s Legal Centre and Migrant and Refugee Children’s Legal Unit. The other sponsors are: City Bridge Trust, Linklaters, RBS and AB Charitable Trust.

Salaries are set by the host organisation; to give you a flavour the Children in Need-associated roles pay £22,400, £20,000 and £24,135 a year respectively.

Fancy it? Applications open today.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post You can now do a training contract funded by Children in Need appeared first on Legal Cheek.


23 out of Macfarlanes’ 25 qualifying trainees given permanent jobs

$
0
0

The other two accepted fixed term contracts; each can expect to earn at least £81,300

City of London law firm Macfarlanes has announced a 92% autumn trainee retention rate.

While all 25 of the qualifying rookies will stay on with the firm as full-fledged solicitors, just 23 have been handed permanent contracts. Two are on fixed term deals.

Thanks to Macfarlanes’ substantial newly qualified pay rise last month, their salaries will soar from £46,000 (the firm’s second year trainee rate) to a new base rate of £75,000. When bonuses are factored in, each can expect to earn at least £81,300, and as much as £90,000 if they perform really well.

They will work across the M&A-geared practice, joining the six trainees who qualified earlier this year in Macfarlanes’ smaller 100% spring retention round.

It has been a good year for the firm, with revenue up 4% to £167.6 million and profit per equity partner up by 8% to £1.38 million (which is magic circle territory). Macfarlanes also got good results in the key categories of the 2016-17 Legal Cheek Trainee and Junior Lawyer Survey, scoring an A* for training, while netting As for quality of work and peer support. But it’s a hard-working place: according to our data, on average trainees and junior associates leave the office at 7:51pm, having started work at 9:04am.

Seán Lavin, the firm’s head of graduate recruitment, said:

We recruit trainees of the highest quality and we do so with a view to offering them long-term careers with the firm. We try very hard to ensure that we can offer a role to each trainee on qualification in order to keep that talent within the firm.

The news follows some widely fluctuating retention rates at rival firms. On Friday Freshfields posted a disappointing 66%, with Dentons (68%) and Taylor Wessing (62%) also announcing figures in the 60s. However, Latham & Watkins managed 95% while Allen & Overy hit 85%. Let us know your firm’s retention rate by emailing tips@legalcheek.com.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post 23 out of Macfarlanes’ 25 qualifying trainees given permanent jobs appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Strictly Come Dancing: Glasgow law graduate and ex-corporate lawyer Susan Calman announced as contestant

$
0
0

Will she dance with a gavel like Judge Rinder?

Fingers crossed we will see more courtroom-themed routines on Strictly Come Dancing this year — another lawyer turned celebrity has been announced as a contestant!

Last year, readers were thrilled when 2 Hare Court barrister Robert Rinder (star of Judge Rinder) took part in the show. Though the criminal law specialist missed out on a spot in the Strictly final, he did give a gavel and robes-laden first week performance sure to delight any law lover:

The clip is among the most viewed of the show’s history — but is it about to be rivalled by a Viennese waltz danced in a law firm meeting room? With lawyer turned comedienne Susan Calman announced as Strictly’s latest star, we can but hope.

Though Calman is best known for her stand-up comedy routines and panel show appearances, the 42-year-old is also a University of Glasgow law graduate and former corporate solicitor.

Calman — having spent time working with inmates on death row in the United States and also working at the United Nations — spent seven years at the commercial law coalface, including at Scottish outfit Dundas & Wilson. In May 2014, the four-office firm merged with CMS Cameron McKenna. This City outfit is now known as CMS, after it combined with Nabarro and Olswang earlier this year.

Data protection specialist Calman reportedly became dissatisfied by her legal career, and packed it in to develop her comedy routines. But, not wanting to kiss the law goodbye forever, she has since performed at This Is Your Trial, a comedy improv show set in court.

Calman will be joining the likes of morning TV presenter Ruth Langsford, JLS’s Aston Merrygold and singer Mollie King as a 2017 Strictly star. The series starts in September, and we can’t wait.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Strictly Come Dancing: Glasgow law graduate and ex-corporate lawyer Susan Calman announced as contestant appeared first on Legal Cheek.

City solicitor turned East End teacher set to send 95% of pupils to Russell Group unis

$
0
0

Two students even went to White & Case’s Abu Dhabi office for work experience

Image via The NCS

A head teacher who packed in his City solicitor career is on the cusp of sending a whopping 95% of his students to Russell Group universities.

Having studied at the London School of Economics and at BPP Law School, Mouhssin Ismail looked set for a glittering corporate law career when he landed a place at Eversheds (now Eversheds Sutherland). After two years there, he joined Norton Rose Fulbright — a firm that pays its newly qualified solicitors £75,000.

But having grown dissatisfied with his career, Ismail cleared his desk and plunged himself into student life. After training at the UCL Institute of Education, he became a teacher at Seven Kings High School, a state school in Ilford, before climbing up the education ranks to make Newham Collegiate Sixth Form principal in 2014. Government stats show head teachers can earn up to £116,000 in the capital.

The London borough of Newham, a young Ismail’s stomping ground, doesn’t quite ooze the wealth and glamour of City life. For a start, its child poverty level (41%) is the second highest in London, and it has one of the city’s highest unemployment rates (9%).

Image via London’s Poverty Profile

Most interestingly for present purposes is the borough’s university progression. Research by London Councils shows that, between 2005 and 2011, 8% of Newham’s young residents went on to study at a Russell Group institution.

With Ismail at the helm of Newham Collegiate Sixth Form — which says it caters for “the most able students in East London” — 95% of pupils have secured offers to study at Russell Group universities. Last year (the only Year 13 comparison we can make because the sixth form is so new) 85% did the same. Nine of this year’s bunch have had offers from either Oxford or Cambridge, while one has secured a place at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

Ismail’s method, he told the Evening Standard, is to “prepare our students the way they would be prepared at top private schools.” So how does Newham Collegiate Sixth Form stack up against arguably the most prestigious private school of them all, Eton?

We can tell you that, annually, 60-100 Eton boys make successful applications to Oxford or Cambridge. Given that the year group is approximately 270-strong, a (staggering) 22%-37% of pupils are Oxbridge-bound each year. This is compared to 5% at Newham Collegiate Sixth Form. Twenty-two pupils at Berkshire boarding school Wellington College have 2017 Oxbridge offers, while the same can be said of 11 students at Kate Middleton’s former school, Marlborough College.

Regardless, student opportunities at Newham Collegiate Sixth Form are impressive. They include (pretty randomly, considering the school is located less than ten miles away from the City) spending time at the Abu Dhabi office of US titan White & Case. Two students enjoyed this trip. Newham Collegiate Sixth Form’s website states politics students have visited the European Parliament, the Senate in Washington and the United Nations in New York, and science students have spent two weeks in Japan. Ismail said:

If pupils have on their CV a week-long work experience placement at White & Case, it is inevitably going to make them stand out when applying for jobs.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post City solicitor turned East End teacher set to send 95% of pupils to Russell Group unis appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Ince & Co keeps nine out of ten NQs

$
0
0

As London litigation specialist Stewarts Law retains just one

City middleweight Ince & Co has revealed a solid 2017 autumn retention rate of 90%.

Out of the ten final seat trainees qualifying this September, nine have committed their future to the shipping specialist and will be taking up newly qualified (NQ) associate roles. The outfit’s London rookies will earn an annual salary of £63,250, an uplift of £21,450 on the firm’s year two trainee pay (£41,800).

The firm’s new associates will be qualifying into departments including shipping, energy, insurance, aviation and corporate. It’s worth noting that two of Ince & Co’s NQs have qualified overseas (Monaco and Dubai).

Andrew Jameson, director of human resources, said:

The success of our graduate trainee programme is testament to the open and inclusive culture at the firm. Trainees are encouraged to make a real contribution and get involved in all aspects of our practice areas with the support of our experienced partners and solicitors. Our flexible seat rotation enables trainees to gain the maximum experience and they are encouraged from day one to seek out opportunities, build strong relationships and take control of their own career.

Legal Cheek’s Most List shows that the firm has 12 offices in eight countries and offers around ten training contracts annually. This time last year, it posted an 89% retention result.

Elsewhere, London litigation specialist Stewarts Law has confirmed a retention score of just 25% (one out of four). This is the lowest result announced by any firm so far this year.

Legal Cheek understands that the soon-to-be associate will be based at the firm’s Leeds outpost. According to Stewarts Law’s website, it offers around four training contracts each year and currently recruits exclusively from its “pool of paralegals.”

Earlier this week City outfit Macfarlanes revealed an impressive 92% autumn score (23 out of 25). The remaining two are on fixed term deals.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Ince & Co keeps nine out of ten NQs appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Linklaters keeps 47 of its 56 trainees upon qualification

$
0
0

Magic circle retains 84% of rookies as newly qualified solicitors

Global titan Linklaters has posted a solid retention score of 84%.

Of the 56 final seat trainees due to qualify this September, 47 will be staying on as newly-qualified (NQ) associates. Linklaters — which is largest training contract provider in the City, with 110 positions annually — confirmed it had made 53 offers, with all but six accepting.

According to Legal Cheek’s Most List, the firm’s rookie associates will start on a very respectable £78,500 a year. A bonus scheme can take top performers up to £90k. Year one trainee salaries currently sit at £43,000, rising to £49,000 in year two.

Traditionally, Linklaters is a strong retention performer. In the last three retention rounds it’s notched up results of 86% (44 out of 51), 91% (51 out of 56) and 83% (45 out of 54).

The Barbican-based outfit’s latest set of financials show that profit per equity partner (PEP) had risen to £1.57 million, up from £1.45 million, while revenues hit £1.43 billion — an uplift of almost 10%.

Elsewhere in the magic circle, Allen & Overy confirmed last week that 40 out of 47 September qualifiers had opted to stick around, equating to a solid retention score of 85%. Meanwhile, Slaughter and May kept hold of 29 out of 32 NQs, giving it a score of 91%. Finally, Freshfields — confirming Legal Cheek predictions — posted an uncharacteristically low 66% (27 out of 41). Clifford Chance is the only magic circler still to reveal its autumn 2017 score.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Linklaters keeps 47 of its 56 trainees upon qualification appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Solicitor who made anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist Facebook comments handed 12-month suspension

$
0
0

He dared a member of the public to report him, so they did

A law firm partner who made anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist posts on social media has been slapped with a 12-month suspension and £25,000 fine by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT).

Using his personal Facebook account, which stated that he was a solicitor, Majid Mahmood, 40, made a number of “despicable” comments about Zionists and Jewish people, according to an SDT judgment published this week.

In October 2015, responding to what the criminal specialist said was a video showing Israeli defence forces killing woman and children, he wrote:

Somebody needs to shoot all the Israeli Zionists dead then send their bodies to America as a present for Obama and his Zionist pals.

When confronted by fellow a Facebook user who asked him what the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) would make of his post, he said (errors left in):

Yeah feel free to report me. Don’t see you saying much about the atrocities committed by the Zionist’s. It’s freedom of speech. But Funny how after having views the killing of innocent children and the systematic assassination of people by a nation that is fuelled by greed all you can do is threaten me that you would report me to the SRA. Don’t read my comments if you don’t like them.

Unfortunately for Mahmood, the member of the public took his advice and reported him to the regulator.

In February 2016, Mahmood — a partner at Luton outfit City Law Chambers at the time — fired off another comment, this time on a Facebook page called ‘Israel is a War Criminal’. In response to an article about Jewish refugees being flown to Israel, he wrote (errors left in):

The ain’t gods chosen people they’re Satans love child’s and it’s a sham e the plane carrying them didn’t blow up mid air.

A further post, in response to a comment posted by another user, he said (again errors left in):

Condoning… Read the words, but as a typical Zionist Israeli tear you can try and twist the words. Mad don’t threaten me go and fuck yourself.

This exchange was flagged up to the SRA by the charity Campaign Against Antisemitism. It was at this point that Mahmood, now a director at Luton firm Liberty Law Solicitors, deleted his Facebook account.

According to the judgment, Mahmood — who also handles immigration work according to his firm website — accepted that the comments were “offensive and wholly inappropriate,” however denied they were anti-Semitic. Further, he accepted that his October 2015 post was anti-Zionist but maintained that it was not anti-Semitic.

In relation to his 2015 posts, the tribunal found that Mahmood had “crossed a line” and “acted without integrity”. Moreover, the three-person panel criticised him for his “entirely dismissive” response to the member of the public who challenged him. However, the SDT, following a very lengthy debate involving three different definitions of anti-Semitism, concluded this comment was not anti-Semitic.

As for Mahmood’s 2016 comments, the tribunal had this to say: “The respondent’s post in which he suggested that it was a shame that a plane carrying people did not blow up in mid-air whatever the context of that comment to be wholly indefensible.” The SDT concluded that this comment was anti-Semitic.

In an interesting aside, the SDT noted that it was irrelevant that Mahmood was posting on Facebook in a private capacity. “Being a solicitor was not a feature of one’s being that one could switch on and off as one chose,” it warned.

Giving evidence at the hearing, Mahmood suggested, among other things, that it was Facebook’s fault for drawing him in to controversial debates. He also argued that that he was not anti-Semitic and had two Jewish friends who were barristers. The SDT noted that neither provided testimonials for him.

Mahmood was handed 12-month suspension (suspended for a further 12 months) and fined £25,000. He will also pay around £9,500 in costs.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Solicitor who made anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist Facebook comments handed 12-month suspension appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Watch what you tweet: CPS promises to crack down on social media hate crime

$
0
0

But lawyers have concerns

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) launched a campaign on hate crime today, promising to “treat online crime as seriously as offline offences”.

Prosecutors have put out new public statements on how they approach crimes motivated by “hostility or prejudice” against the victim because of their disability, race, religion, sexual orientation or transgender identity, as well as updating the official legal guidance on hate crime prosecutions.

Announcing the campaign, director of public prosecutions Alison Saunders specifically mentioned the aristocrat — Rhodri Phillips, 4th Viscount St Davids — who was jailed over menacing Facebook posts about Brexit campaigner Gina Miller. Reports of hate crime rose sharply in the aftermath of the EU referendum.

There are specific hate crime offences, such as stirring up racial hatred, but prosecutors can also ask for a stiffer sentence following almost any crime if they can show that it involved hostility or prejudice against, for example, gay people.

The CPS’s hardening line may result in stiffer sentences for hate crime perpetrators, both on and offline. Saunders revealed today that prosecutors successfully applied for a sentencing uplift in over half of hate crime cases last year — up from just 4% a few years ago.

Saunders acknowledged that some people might find the new guidance on online behaviour “heavy-handed”. She’s not wrong there:

But Labour MP Luciana Berger, herself the victim of anti-Semitic abuse, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that threats and abuse have “as much impact… online as it would have physically, in person”.

Other lawyers applauded the campaign’s aim, but worried that the criminal justice system won’t be able to handle an increase in hate crime work.

And there were even questions about whether the CPS’s own rules will get in the way:

The authorities say that they’ll “prosecute complaints of hate crime online with the same robust and proactive approach used with offline offending”. And they suggest that “amplifiers or disseminators” of criminal social media — such as retweeters, we’d suggest — might be targeted, as well as “originators”.

Younger people may be treated more leniently, though: the CPS says it understands that “children may not appreciate the potential harm and seriousness of their communications”.

As the CPS points out, not all online bullying, even if based on the likes of race or disability, will amount to a hate crime. But social media stupidity doesn’t have to cross the line into criminal offending for it to mess up your career prospects — Legal Cheek reported just last week that solicitor Majid Mahood was suspended for a year after regulators were told about anti-Semitic Facebook posts.

Even members of the judiciary aren’t immune to the lure of an anonymous rant: Jason Dunn-Shaw was sacked from Canterbury Crown Court last year after taking the fight to online critics of his decisions.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Watch what you tweet: CPS promises to crack down on social media hate crime appeared first on Legal Cheek.


Gowling WLG posts 84% autumn retention result

$
0
0

As national outfit Browne Jacobson scores 67%

International law firm Gowling WLG has posted a solid 84% autumn retention result.

From a qualifying cohort of 25, the outfit confirmed that 21 soon-to-be associates had put pen to paper on permanent deals. Gowling’s London HQ will gain 12 newly-qualified (NQ) lawyers, while its Birmingham branch will receive nine. None are on fixed term contracts.

As can be seen from our Most List, Gowling’s London NQs will earn a salary of £59,000. Trainee pay packets sit at £38,500, rising to £41,500 in year two. Birmingham trainee salaries currently sit at £27,000 and £30,000 respectively.

Today’s result is slightly higher than the firm’s 2016 autumn score. On that occasion, Gowling — which offers around 30 training contracts each year — kept hold of 18 of its 23 qualifying trainees (78%). However, it is worth noting on that occasion one newbie was on a fixed term deal.

Turning to Gowling’s performance in the Legal Cheek Trainee and Junior Lawyer Survey, the firm scored As in five categories: training, quality of work, peer support, partner approachability and office. It also bagged an A* for that all-important canteen.

Elsewhere, national law firm Browne Jacobson has secured the services of six of its nine autumn qualifiers (67%).

The outfit, which dishes out around 20 training contacts annually, confirmed that its new recruits will be spread across its Nottingham, Birmingham, Manchester and London offices. According to its website, NQs will be paid the “market rate”.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Gowling WLG posts 84% autumn retention result appeared first on Legal Cheek.

White & Case keeps 15 of its 18 London NQs following 17% salary hike

$
0
0

English-qualified lawyers wanted despite Brexit, says US megafirm

White & Case’s London office has announced a positive autumn 2017 retention rate of 83%.

The New York-headquartered behemoth, which offers around 50 City training contracts annually, has revealed that of its 18 trainees due to qualify this autumn, 15 had accepted permanent positions at the firm.

Legal Cheek’s Most List shows that White & Case’s newly qualified (NQ) lawyers will earn a recently improved salary of £105,000. This puts the firm’s fresh-faced associates on pay par with their peers at Shearman & Sterling. White & Case first year trainees pocket £46,000, rising to £50,000 in year two.

The NQs will spread across several of the firm’s practice areas including banking, commercial litigation, intellectual property, international arbitration, mergers & acquisitions and tax. White & Case confirmed that one lawyer would be joining its Moscow office.

Justin Benson, head of White & Cases trainee solicitor programme in London, said:

White & Case continues to have a strong requirement for English-qualified lawyers to support clients globally on deals and disputes, and this requirement continues despite any uncertainty caused by Brexit.

Traditionally, White & Case is a solid retention performer. In the last three rounds it’s notched up results of 88% (15 out of 17), 75% (15 out of 20) and 87% (13 out of 15).

The US outfit’s London office secured several top scores in Legal Cheek’s Trainee and Junior Lawyer Survey. It achieved an A* for international secondment opportunities, as well as As for training, quality of work, perks and social life.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post White & Case keeps 15 of its 18 London NQs following 17% salary hike appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Kirkland & Ellis ups trainee pay to £50-55k as Macfarlanes boosts to £44-49k

$
0
0

A lot of money for 22 and 23-year-olds

The London office of US titan Kirkland & Ellis and high-end M&A specialists Macfarlanes have upped trainee pay packets in simultaneous moves that will see their rookies’ earnings increase substantially.

We can reveal that Kirkland’s year one trainees will now earn £50,000, up from £46,000 (a 9% bump), while those a year ahead will pocket before tax £55,000, up from £50,000 (a 10% rise). The pay boosts — which come into effect next month — put the firm’s young lawyer hopefuls at the top of Legal Cheek’s trainee pay table, and on the same levels of cash as their peers at fellow US firms Davis Polk and Sullivan & Cromwell.

Elite corporate outfit Macfarlanes has made a similar move. First year trainees at the firm will now earn £44,000, rising to £49,000 in year two. Prior to the boosts trainees received £42,000 and £46,000 respectively. The move comes just a month after Macfarlanes raised its NQ pay by a whopping 17%, with new associates now earning a very respectable £81,300.

Although unchanged, Gherkin-based Kirkland’s newly-qualified (NQ) pay is monstrous. Off the back of last year’s MoneyLaw mania across the pond, a host of elite firms, including Kirkland, bumped US year one associate pay to $180,000. Incredibly, some opted to chuck the same rises at their London lot, resulting in dollar-tied NQ salaries hitting a high of £147,000. Kirkland’s newly qualified UK solicitors currently earn just over £140,000 based on current exchange rates.

Kirkland and Macfarlanes have had mixed autumn trainee retention rate fortunes this year. The former recently announced a disappointing 56% score (5 out of 9). Legal Cheek understands that the low figure is a result of NQs being unable to qualify into their department of choice. Macfarlanes, however, managed a very respectable 92%, with 23 of its 25 trainees being taken on permanently as full-fledged solicitors, and the other two getting fixed term contracts.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Kirkland & Ellis ups trainee pay to £50-55k as Macfarlanes boosts to £44-49k appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Hogan Lovells and Eversheds Sutherland reveal 80% autumn retention results

$
0
0

Solid scores from global duo

Hogan Lovells and Eversheds Sutherland have posted their autumn 2017 retention results.

First up, Hogan Lovells. It confirmed that 24 of its 30 trainees due to qualify this September have opted to stick around, giving the outfit a solid 80% score. The firm’s newly qualified (NQ) lawyers will start on a recently increased salary of £75,000. Its trainees currently earn £44,000 in year one and £49,000 in year two.

Ten NQs will join the firm’s corporate group, while eight are finance bound, four are heading to litigation and employment, and one to intellectual property. The remaining lawyer is joining Hogan Lovells’ Singapore office.

Among the firm’s new recruits is a former King & Wood Mallesons (KWM) trainee. Following the collapse of KWM’s UK, European and Middle East (EUME) arm earlier this year, a host of City outfits came forward to help its 60 or so stranded trainees in a rescue mission first revealed by Legal Cheek.

Hogan Lovells, which posted a spring retention score of 79% (23 out of 29), has 49 offices in 26 countries, and offers around 60 training contacts each year. It performed well in our Trainee and Junior Lawyer Survey, racking up As for, among other things, training, quality of work and peer support.

Meanwhile, Eversheds Sutherland — recently formed through a transatlantic merger between UK-based outfit Eversheds and US law firm Sutherland Asbill & Brennan — has chalked up a 80% retention score.

From a qualifying cohort of 55, the firm confirmed that 44 had put pen to paper on associate deals. Eversheds Sutherland’s new lawyers will be spread across a number of the its UK offices including London, Cambridge, Birmingham, Cardiff, Manchester, Newcastle, Nottingham and Leeds. London NQs will start on £64,000, while those in the regions will earn £41,500.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

The post Hogan Lovells and Eversheds Sutherland reveal 80% autumn retention results appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Will studying at the Open University limit my training contract chances?

$
0
0

Its status among solicitors is a worry

In the latest instalment in our Career Conundrums series, one reader has some law degree decisions to make.

I am currently working for a mid-sized law firm in central London while studying for my CILEx qualification part-time. I have applied to study for the LLB in legal practice at City, University of London — it’s an online course developed with CILEx. At the moment I’m waiting to see if I have satisfied my offer, but I am also looking at studying with the Open University if I do not. Do you think studying with the Open University will put me at a disadvantage when applying for training contracts?

If you have a career conundrum, email us with it to careers@legalcheek.com.

The post Will studying at the Open University limit my training contract chances? appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Viewing all 4559 articles
Browse latest View live